Abstract
This paper describes agent-based simulations designed to study emerging networks that are created thanks to different logics of communication. The model is inspired by sociological observations led in a courthouse, in Paris, and by assumptions on the motivations for individuals to interact in this context. Two ways to choose communication partner are here represented: by following a pre-existing hierarchy; by reproducing past interactions. Both logics are described as well as their effect on the evolution of networks, and their combination is analyzed. The work is in its first phase, and although we get inspiration from real world observation, we are not leading yet a complete comparison of artificial and real society but more an exploration on how the simulations could help us in the following interview research and potentially eliminate some of our hypothesis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cowan R., Jonard N., Zimmermann J.B., 2003, The Joint Dynamics of Networks and Knowledge, in: Heterogenous Agents, Interactions and Economic Performance, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Nℴ521, Springer.
Jackson M. O., Watts A., 2002, The Evolution of Social and Economic Networks,Journal of Economie Theory, v. 106, iss. 2, pp. 265–295.
Granovetter M., 1973, The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Lazega E., Favereau O., 2002, Conventions and Structures in Economic Organization: Markets, Networks and Hierarchies: Introduction, Conventions and structures in economic organization: Markets, networks and hierarchies, pp. 1–28.
Lazega E., 2003, “Networks in legal organizations: On the protection of public interest in joint regulation of markets”, Wiarda Chair Inaugural Address 2003, Wiarda Institute Publications, Faculty of Law, Utrecht University.
Lazega E. and Mounier L., 2003, “Interlocking Judges: On Joint External and Self-Governance of Markets”, in Vincent Buskens, Werner Raub and Chris Snijders (eds), Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 20: 267–296.
Marschak T., Reichelstein S., 1995, Communication Requirements for Individual Agents in Networks and Hierarchies, The economics of informational decentralization: Complexity, efficiency, and stability, 1995, Kluwer Academic, pp. 311–346.
Rouchier J., Bousquet F., O’Connor M., 2001, Emergence of reputation in an artificial society: modelling non-merchant exchanges among autonomous agents, JASSS, vol 4issue 2.
Slikker M., Gilles R.P., Norde H, Tijs S., 2005, Create hierarchies from network with equal agents at the origin, by manipulating payoff: Directed Networks, Allocation Properties and Hierarchy Formation, Mathematical Social Sciences, January 2005, vol. 49, iss. 1, pp. 55–80.
Thorelli H. B., 1995, Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies, Integral strategy: Integration as focus, Advances in Strategic Management, vol. 11 (Part B), Greenwich, Conn, and London: JAI Press, pp. 229–247.
White, Harrison, Scott A. Boorman and Ronald L. Breiger (1976), “Social Structure From Multiple Networks I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 81, pp 730–780.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rouchier, J., Lazega, E., Mounier, L. (2007). Articulation of hierarchy and networks as an evolving social structure. In: Terano, T., Kita, H., Deguchi, H., Kijima, K. (eds) Agent-Based Approaches in Economic and Social Complex Systems IV. Agent-Based Social Systems, vol 3. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-71307-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-71307-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-71306-7
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-71307-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)