Skip to main content

Non-sliding (Static) Knots

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Knots in Orthopedic Surgery

Abstract

Technical advances in arthroscopic surgery have popularized the use of sliding knots in favor of traditional non-sliding or static knots. This preference may be a result of technical ease of tying through a cannula, as the surgeon can secure knots without switching post limbs. However, it has been shown that non-sliding knots such as the square or the Revo knot provide better loop and knot security. Furthermore, sliding knots cannot be used with suture anchors lacking an eyelet or in situations where it is difficult to slide sutures through soft tissue. Another indication for static knot tying is for repairs of degenerative soft tissue. In these cases, the suture may cause further damage to the tissue while advancing the knot. When performing a non-sliding knot, one has to take into consideration that the knot has to be seated properly before adding reversed half hitches to avoid premature knot locking resulting insufficient loop and knot security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barber FA, et al. Cyclic load and failure behavior of arthroscopic knots and high strength sutures. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(2):192–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baumgarten KM, et al. An in vitro analysis of the mechanical properties of 16 arthroscopic knots. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(10):957–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark RR, et al. Biomechanical performance of traditional arthroscopic knots versus slippage-proof knots. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(7):1175–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elkousy HA, et al. A biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic sliding and sliding-locking knots. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(2):204–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ilahi OA, et al. Cyclic testing of arthroscopic knot security. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(1):62–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lo IK, et al. Arthroscopic knots: determining the optimal balance of loop security and knot security. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(5):489–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lo IK, et al. A comparison of knot security and loop security in arthroscopic knots tied with newer high-strength suture materials. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(9 Suppl):S120–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Riboh JC, et al. Shortcuts in arthroscopic knot tying: do they affect knot and loop security? Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(7):1572–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodes SA, et al. Performance comparison of a pretied suture knot with three conventional arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(11):2183–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassinger SM, et al. Biomechanical characteristics of 10 arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(8):827–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SH, et al. Significance of the internal locking mechanism for loop security enhancement in the arthroscopic knot. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(8):850–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Trimbos JB. Security of various knots commonly used in surgical practice. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;64(2):274–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Loutzenheiser TD, et al. Optimizing arthroscopic knots using braided or monofilament suture. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(1):57–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nottage WM, Lieurance RK. Arthroscopic knot typing techniques. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(5):515–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Elkousy H, et al. The arthroscopic square knot: a biomechanical comparison with open and arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy. 2006;22(7):736–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Swan KG Jr, et al. Arthroscopic suture material and knot type: an updated biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(8):1578–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ilahi OA, et al. Security of knots tied with ethibond, fiberwire, orthocord, or ultrabraid. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(12):2407–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baumgarten KM, Wright RW. Ease of tying arthroscopic knots. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2007;16(4):438–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Burkhart SS, Lo IK. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(6):333–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Burkhart SS, et al. Loop security as a determinant of tissue fixation security. Arthroscopy. 1998;14(7):773–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Neuhofer S, et al. Surgical knot tightening: how much pull is necessary? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(11):2849–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dahl KA, et al. Biomechanical characteristics of 9 arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(6):813–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chan KC, Burkhart SS. How to switch posts without rethreading when tying half-hitches. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(4):444–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan KC, et al. Optimization of stacked half-hitch knots for arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy. 2001;17(7):752–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Livermore RW, et al. Knot security, loop security, and elongation of braided polyblend sutures used for arthroscopic knots. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010;39(12):569–76.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Meier JD, Meier SW. Over-pointing technique: an approach to past-pointing arthroscopic knots on alternating suture posts without alternating the knot pusher. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(12):1358.e1351–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Burkhart SS, et al. Knot security in simple sliding knots and its relationship to rotator cuff repair: how secure must the knot be? Arthroscopy. 2000;16(2):202–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mishra DK, et al. Elongation of arthroscopically tied knots. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25(1):113–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Delimar D. A secure arthroscopic knot. Arthroscopy. 1996;12(3):345–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Harryman DT II, et al. Arthroscopic labral repair to the glenoid rim. Arthroscopy. 1994;10(1):20–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Richmond JC. A comparison of ultrasonic suture welding and traditional knot tying. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(3):297–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Snyder SJ. Technique of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using implantable 4-mm Revo suture anchors, suture shuttle relays, and no. 2 nonabsorbable mattress sutures. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997;28(2):267–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lieurance RK, et al. Failure characteristics of various arthroscopically tied knots. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;408:311–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Musahl M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 ESSKA

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Herbst, E., Yoshida, M., Gasbarro, G., Ikpe, S., Musahl, V. (2018). Non-sliding (Static) Knots. In: Akgun, U., Karahan, M., Randelli, P., Espregueira-Mendes, J. (eds) Knots in Orthopedic Surgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56108-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-56108-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-56107-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-56108-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics