Skip to main content

Patient self-monitoring

  • Chapter
  • 1531 Accesses

Abstract

The technical advances made in terms of simpler and faster glucose monitoring systems confer significant benefit in the daily lives of patients suffering from diabetes. Additional requirements must be met in order to prevent the risk of errors arising from the use and interpretation of glucose measurements as well as to enable patients deemed capable to perform self-monitoring. Two main test system principles are available to patients with diabetes mellitus to help them control their glucose metabolism: Self-monitoring of urine and of blood glucose levels. The standard procedure is to measure blood glucose in fresh capillary blood, usually taken as a single specimen from the fingertip or earlobe. Additionally, devices for continuous blood glucose monitoring that rely on needle sensors are available. Such meters monitor glucose in the subcutaneous interstitial fluid and convert it into blood glucose equivalents.Patient self-management in vitamin K antagonist treatment requires regular INR monitoring, usually once per week. INR testing by the patients themselves at the point of care leads to significant improvements in clinical outcome and quality of life. Especially a significant reduction in the number of deaths on vitamin K antagonist treatment has been shown. By definition, INR is 1.0 in individuals with normal coagulation. Treatment with vitamin K antagonists causes higher values. Depending on diagnosis, e.g. thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation and heart valve replacement, the target INR nowadays has a target range of 2.0–3.0 in most cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Azarnoush K, Camilleri L, Aublet-Cuvelier B, et al. (2011) Results of the first randomized French study evaluating self testing of the International Normalized Ratio. J Heart Valve Dis 20(5):518–525

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barthels M, Bergmann F (2016) Global- und Gruppentests. In: Barthels M (ed) Das Gerinnungskompendium. 2nd ed. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, p 359–370

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baumstark A, Pleus S, Schmid C et al. (2012) Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems or self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197. J Diabetes Sci Technol 6:1076–1086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dauphin C, Legault B, Jaffeux P, et al. (2008) Comparison of INR stability between self-monitoring and standard laboratory method: preliminary results of a prospective study in 67 mechanical heart valve patients. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 101 (11–12):753–761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft (2015) Praxisempfehlungen: Therapie des Typ-1-Diabetes. Diabetologie 10 (Suppl 2) S129–S139

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft (2015) Praxisempfehlungen: Therapie des Typ-2-Diabetes. Diabetologie 10 (Suppl 2) S140-S151

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deutschen Diabetes Gesellschaft (2016) Stellungnahme 11 February 2016: Notwendigkeit der Desinfektion der Haut vor der Kapillar-Blutgewinnung für die Glukosemessung im Krankenhaus. http://www.deutsche-diabetes-gesellschaft.de/stellungnahmen/stellungnahmen.html

  8. DIN German Institute for Standardization (2015) In vitro diagnostic test systems – Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus (ISO 15197:2013); English Version DIN EN ISO 15197:2015

    Google Scholar 

  9. Freckmann G, Schmid C, Baumstark A et al. (2012) System accuracy evaluation of 43 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to DIN EN ISO 15197. J Diabetes Sci Technol 6:1060–1075

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Freckmann G, Link M, Schmid C et al. (2015) System accuracy evaluation of different blood glucose monitoring systems following ISO 15197:2013 by using two different comparison methods. Diabetes Technol Ther 17:635–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Freckmann G (2016) Patientensicherheit bei der Blutzuckermessung. Thieme Praxis Report 8 (3): 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heneghan C, Alonso-Coello P, Garcia-Alamino JM, Perera R, Meats E, Glasziou P (2006) Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 367(9508):404–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hentrich DP, Fritschi J, Muller PR, Wuillemin WA (2007) INR comparison between the CoaguChek S and a standard laboratory method among patients with self-management of oral anticoagulation. Thrombosis Research 119(4):489–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ryan F, O’Shea S, Byrne S (2010) The reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S and XS INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring. Int J Lab Hematol 32 (1 Pt 1):e26–e33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scandinavian evaluation of laboratory equipment for primary health care (SKUP): http://www.skup.nu

  16. Siebenhofer A, Berghold A, Sawicki PT (2004) Systematic review of studies of self-management of oral anticoagulation. Thromb Haemost 91(2): 225–232

    Google Scholar 

  17. Torreiro EG, Fernandez EG, Rodriguez RM, Lopez CV, Nunez JB (2009) Comparative study of accuracy and clinical agreement of the CoaguChek XS portable device versus standard laboratory practice in unexperienced patients. Thromb Haemost 101(5):969–974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Verband der Diabetes-Beratungs- und Schulungsberufe in Deutschland e.V.(VDBD) (2014) Leitfaden zur Blutzucker-Selbstkontrolle in Beratung und Therapie 2–39; Eigenverlag

    Google Scholar 

  19. WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (1983) Thirty-third report. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 687:1–184

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rott, H., Koschinsky, T. (2018). Patient self-monitoring. In: Luppa, P.B., Junker, R. (eds) Point-of-Care Testing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54497-6_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics