Skip to main content

OEM oder Serviceanbieter?

Wie Toyota mit e-Palette die Automobilindustrie revolutioniert

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Unser Alltag ist ein wiederkehrendes Wechselspiel zwischen Tätigkeiten, die an einem bestimmten Ort erbracht werden müssen oder möchten, und Mobilität, d. h. das Erreichen dieser Tätigkeitsstätten. Im digitalen Automobilzeitalter kann dieses Wechselspiel neu organisiert werden. Dieses Potential hat auch Toyota frühzeitig erkannt. Der Automobilhersteller stellte auf der CES 2018 die Vision „e-Palette“ vor, ein revolutionäres Plattformsystem für autonome Mobilitätslösungen in Partnerschaft mit den Technologiegiganten Amazon, Microsoft und Uber.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ballon, P. (2009). Control and value in mobile communications. A political economy of the reconfiguration of business models in the European mobile industry (PhD Theses, VUB, Bussels, Belgium).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J. M. (2014). The evolution of the European regulatory framework for electronic communication. IBEI working papers Telefonica chair series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillaud, B. & Jullien, B. (2003). Chicken, & Egg: Competition among intermediation service providers. RAND Journal of Economics, 34, 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusumano, M. A. & Gawer, A. (2002). The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2009). Opening platforms: How, when and why? In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, Markets, and Innovation (pp. 131–164). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann, T. R., Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2011). Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1270–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S. & Schmalensee, R. (2007). Industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms. Competition Policy International, 3(1), 151–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu, A. (2007). Merchant or two-sided platform? Review of Network Economics, 6(2), 115–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu, A. (2009). Two-Sided Platforms: Product Variety and Pricing Structures. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(4), 1011–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu, A. (2012). Software Platforms. In M. Peitz & J. Waldfogel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the digital economy (pp. 59–82). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu, A. & Jullien, B. [Bruno]. (2014). Search diversion and platform competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 33, 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu, A. & Wright, J. (2015). Multi-sided platforms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 43, 162–174. R

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölck, K. (2016). Beyond the Single Platform: An Assessment of the Functioning and Regulatory Challenges of Multi-Layered Platform Systems in the Media and Communications Sector. PhD Dissertation, Vrije Universität Brussel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölck, K., Cremer, S., & Ballon, P. (2016). Cross-platform effects: Towards a measure for platform integration benefit. 4th annual open and user innovation conference (OUI). Harvard Business School, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 668–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J.-C. & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J.-C. & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: A progress report. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(3), 645–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. G. & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494–1504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roson, R. (2005). Two-sided markets: A tentative survey. Review of Network Economics, 4(2), 142–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, P. & Doyle, G. (2015). From organizational crisis to multi-platform salvation? Creative destruction and the recomposition of news media. Journalism, 16(3), 305–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, J. J. (1950). Vertical integration and antitrust policy. The Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 347–352. JSTOR: https://doi.org/10.2307/1828887

  • Treacy, M. & Wiersema, F. (1993). Costumer intimacy and other value disciplines. Havard Business Review, 71(1), 84–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the Field. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, E. G. (2008). Double marginalisation in two-sided markets. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1324412

  • Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of Case Study Research (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th Ed.). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Hölck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hölck, K., Höflich, S., Wehinger, J. (2019). OEM oder Serviceanbieter?. In: Proff, H. (eds) Mobilität in Zeiten der Veränderung . Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26107-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26107-8_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26106-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26107-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics