Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Agent im Kreis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Filmanalyse

  • 13k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Bei dekonstruktiven Filmanalysen kann man sich nie sicher sein. Das macht ihre Beweglichkeit aus. Schaut man sich exemplarische Lektüren von 1971, 1986, 2012 und 2016 an, taucht James Bond plötzlich an Orten auf, wo man ihn nicht vermutet hätte. Kein Film bleibt, wie er ist. Das ist immer so, aber die Dekonstruktion hilft, sich das klar zu machen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Das funktioniert nicht einmal in der Theorie, wenn man Theorie + Film bei nur einem Autor sucht. Solch ein „approach would be to ignore, more or less studiously, all of Derrida’s essays on the visual that we do not relate either to photography or to cinema. But in the first place, that separation would be exceedingly difficult to delineate“ (Wills 2015, S. 80).

  2. 2.

    „[John] Dee often corresponded with the queen on confidential matters. He took to signing his letters „007“ to designate letters for the queen’s eyes only. The zeroes represented eyes, and the seven was thought to be a lucky number that offered protection. Many scholars believe that Dee was one of Elizabeth’s spies, and that his travels throughout Europe were not for „spiritual conferences,“ but rather to gather intelligence“ (Masters 2013).

  3. 3.

    „In order to be fabulous, nuclear criticism must not only be incompetent, it must also be funny“ (Klein und Warner 1986, S. 2).

  4. 4.

    „Jim often looked downright shabby, his suits old and frayed according to a colleague who met him in the mid-1930s. Once when this person run into Jim downtown on Chestnut Street she mistook him at first for a vagrant“ (Contosta 1993, S. 61).

  5. 5.

    „I’m always interested in archives that develop before value is established – and then how they mutate once it is recognized“ (Simon 2015).

  6. 6.

    „‚Did you watch all the James Bond films?‘ ‚The films were watched chronologically in a binge. And then reviewed again and again. The entire studio was involved‘“ (Simon 2015).

Literatur

  • Biasi, Gian-Paolo. 1971. Rhetorical questions. From James Bond to Dante. Diacritics 1(1): 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, Mrs James. 1966. How 007 got his name. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contosta, David R. 1993. The private life of James Bond. Lititz: Sutter House.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Man, Paul. 1963. The rhetoric of temporality. In Interpretation: Theory and practice, Hrsg. C. S. Singleton, 173–209. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Man, Paul. 1986. The resistance to theory. In The resistance to theory, 3–20. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1984. No Apocalypse, not now (full speed ahead, seven missiles, seven missives). Diacritics 14(2): 20–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. [2001] 2015. Cinema and its ghosts. Discourse [Cahiers Du Cinema] 37(1–2): 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Editorial]. 1971. henceforth, diacritics. a review of contemporary criticism: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fohrmann, Jürgen. 1988. Der Kommentar als diskursive Einheit der Wissenschaft. In Diskurstheorien und Literaturwissenschaft, Hrsg. Fohrmann von Jürgen und Müller Harro, 244–257. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartenberg, Jon. 1984. The Brighton project: The archives and research. Iris 2(1): 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossvogel, David L. 1972. Diacritics 2(3): 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagener, Malte. 2011. Wo ist Film (heute)? Film/Kino im Zeitalter der Medienimmanenz. In Orte filmischen Wissens. Filmkultur und Filmvermittlung im Zeitalter digitaler Netzwerke, Hrsg. Sommer von Gudrun, Vinzenz Hediger und Oliver Fahle, 45–59. Marburg: Schüren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatje Cantz. 2013. Taryn Simon. Birds of the West Indies. Verlagsprogramm Hatje Cantz. http://www.hatjecantz.de/taryn-simon-5792-0.html. Zugegriffen am 04.06.2017.

  • Hellman, Geoffrey. 1962. Bond’s creator. The New Yorker, 21. April 1962:32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Richard, und William B. Warner. 1986. Nuclear coincidence and the Korean Airline Disaster. Diacritics 16(1): 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Kevin B., und Deborah Lipp. 2012. Growing up a Bond girl [Video], Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/52424644. Zugegriffen am 04.06.2017.

  • Masters, Kristin. 2013. The first James Bond? John Dee was the original 007!, Books tell you why, 30.04.2013. http://blog.bookstellyouwhy.com/bid/274528/The-first-James-Bond-John-Dee-Was-the-Original-007. Zugegriffen am 04.06.2017.

  • N.N. 2014. Art. Harun Farocki. filmportal.de. http://www.filmportal.de/person/harun-farocki_e76676ae0de849b5b7bcbdd92ff4ae6f. Zugegriffen am 04.06.2017.

  • Nettelbeck, Uwe. [1965] 2011. Das feine Leben und der flinke Totschlag. James Bonds bunte Badeabenteuer – zur ‚Feuerball‘-Premiere. In Keine Ahnung von Kunst und wenig vom Geschäft. Filmkritik 1963–1968, Hrsg. Sandra Nettelbeck, 151–157. Hamburg: Philo Fine Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettelbeck, Uwe. 1998. Titanic revisited. Eine Liebe, die über die Elemente triumphiert, ist nicht jedermanns Sache. Jungle World 8. http://jungle-world.com/artikel/1998/07/37071.html. Zugegriffen am 04.06.2017.

  • Nolan, William. 1961. Ian Fleming – Personality, A tour with the creator of James Bond, Goldfinger, and the insidious Dr. No as he seeks sin – Chicago-style, Rogue. Designed for Men 2:24 und 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Playboy Interview. 1964. Ian Fleming. In this final colloquy, the late creator of James Bond discusses his life and loves – and his legendary hero, 007. Playboy, Dezember 1964:97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Taryn. 2015. Birds of the West Indies. Interview with Taryn Simon. Art Bahrain, 30.09.2015. http://artbahrain.org/home/?p=6291. Zugegriffen am 04.06.2017.

  • Simon, Taryn. 2016. Field guide to birds of the West Indies. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogl, Joseph. 2005. Lovebirds. In Blickzähmung und Augentäuschung: zu Jacques Lacans Bildtheorie, Hrsg. Blümle von Claudia und Anne von der Heiden, 51–63. Berlin: Diaphanes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills, David. 2015. Screen replays. Discourse 37(1–2): 74–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Stephen, und Claire Ellicott. 2012. The secret Bond girl: Unknown artist dubbed the voices of 007’s best-known beauties – But now she’s banned from the movies spy’s 50th birthday party!. Daily Mail, 22.09.2012. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2206882/Bonds-secret-girl-Unknown-artist-dubbed-voices-007s-best-known-beauties--know-shes-banned-movies-spys-50th-birthday-party.html. Zugegriffen am 04.06.2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Theater-, Film und Medienwissenschaft, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland

    Rembert Hüser

Authors
  1. Rembert Hüser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rembert Hüser .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Medienwissenschaft, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    Malte Hagener

  2. Seminar für Filmwissenschaft, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Volker Pantenburg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hüser, R. (2020). Agent im Kreis. In: Hagener, M., Pantenburg, V. (eds) Handbuch Filmanalyse. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13339-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13339-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-13338-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-13339-9

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation