Skip to main content

Using Interpolation for the Verification of Security Protocols

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 8203))

Abstract

Interpolation has been successfully applied in formal methods for model checking and test-case generation for sequential programs. Security protocols, however, exhibit such idiosyncrasies that make them unsuitable to the direct application of such methods. In this paper, we address this problem and present an interpolation-based method for security protocol verification. Our method starts from a formal protocol specification and combines Craig interpolation, symbolic execution and the standard Dolev-Yao intruder model to search for possible attacks on the protocol. Interpolants are generated as a response to search failure in order to prune possible useless traces and speed up the exploration. We illustrate our method by means of a concrete example and discuss the results obtained by using a prototype implementation.

Work partially supported by the FP7-ICT-2009-5 Project no. 257876, “SPaCIoS: Secure Provision and Consumption in the Internet of Services”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armando, A., et al.: The AVANTSSAR Platform for the Automated Validation of Trust and Security of Service-Oriented Architectures. In: Flanagan, C., König, B. (eds.) TACAS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7214, pp. 267–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Armando, A., et al.: The AVISPA Tool for the Automated Validation of Internet Security Protocols and Applications. In: Etessami, K., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) CAV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3576, pp. 281–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Armando, A., Carbone, R., Compagna, L., Cuéllar, J., Tobarra Abad, L.: Formal Analysis of SAML 2.0 Web Browser Single Sign-On: Breaking the SAML-based Single Sign-On for Google Apps. In: FMSE. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armando, A., Pellegrino, G., Carbone, R., Merlo, A., Balzarotti, D.: From Model-Checking to Automated Testing of Security Protocols: Bridging the Gap. In: Brucker, A.D., Julliand, J. (eds.) TAP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7305, pp. 3–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Basin, D., Mödersheim, S., Viganò, L.: OFMC: A symbolic model checker for security protocols. Int. Journal of Information Security 4(3), 181–208 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Büchler, M., Oudinet, J., Pretschner, A.: Security mutants for property-based testing. In: Gogolla, M., Wolff, B. (eds.) TAP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6706, pp. 69–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Craig, W.: Three uses of the Herbrand-Gentzen theorem in relating model theory and proof theory. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 22(3), 269–285 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Dolev, D., Yao, A.: On the Security of Public-Key Protocols. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 2(29) (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Henzinger, T.A., Jhala, R., Majumdar, R., McMillan, K.L.: Abstractions from proofs. In: POPL, pp. 232–244. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. King, J.C.: Symbolic execution and program testing. CACM 19(7), 385–394 (1976)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowe, G.: Breaking and Fixing the Needham-Shroeder Public-Key Protocol Using FDR. In: Margaria, T., Steffen, B. (eds.) TACAS 1996. LNCS, vol. 1055, pp. 147–166. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. McMillan, K.L.: Applications of Craig Interpolants in Model Checking. In: Halbwachs, N., Zuck, L.D. (eds.) TACAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3440, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. McMillan, K.L.: Lazy annotation for program testing and verification. In: Touili, T., Cook, B., Jackson, P. (eds.) CAV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6174, pp. 104–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. McMillan, K.L.: Interpolants from Z3 proofs. In: FMCAD, pp. 19–27 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell, J.C., Mitchell, M., Stern, U.: Automated analysis of cryptographic protocols using Murphi. In: Security and Privacy, pp. 141–151. IEEE CS (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. de Moura, L., Bjørner, N.S.: Z3: An efficient SMT solver. In: Ramakrishnan, C.R., Rehof, J. (eds.) TACAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 4963, pp. 337–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rusinowitch, M., Turuani, M.: Protocol insecurity with a finite number of sessions and composed keys is NP-complete. TCS 299, 451–475 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. von Oheimb, D., Mödersheim, S.: ASLan++ — A formal security specification language for distributed systems. In: Aichernig, B.K., de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M. (eds.) FMCO 2010. LNCS, vol. 6957, pp. 1–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rocchetto, M., Viganò, L., Volpe, M., Vedove, G.D. (2013). Using Interpolation for the Verification of Security Protocols. In: Accorsi, R., Ranise, S. (eds) Security and Trust Management. STM 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8203. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41098-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41098-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41097-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41098-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics