Skip to main content

A Two-Tiered Formalization of Social Influence

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8196))

Abstract

We propose a new dynamic hybrid logic to reason about social networks and their dynamics building on the work of “Logic in the Community” by Seligman, Liu and Girard. Our framework distinguishes between the purely private sphere of agents, namely their mental states, and the public sphere of their observable behavior, i.e., what they seem to believe. We then show how such a distinction allows our framework to model many social phenomena, by presenting the case of pluralistic ignorance as an example and discussing some of its dynamic properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van Benthem, J.: Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction. Cambridge University Press, The Netherlands (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Easley, D., Kleinberg, J.: Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson, M.O.: Social and Economic Networks. Princeton University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seligman, J., Liu, F., Girard, P.: Logic in the community. In: Banerjee, M., Seth, A. (eds.) ICLA 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6521, pp. 178–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhen, L., Seligman, J.: A logical model of the dynamics of peer pressure. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 278, 275–288 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Seligman, J., Girard, P., Liu, F.: Logical dynamics of belief change in the community. Under Submission (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Girard, P., Seligman, J., Liu, F.: General dynamic dynamic logic. In: Bolander, T., Brauner, T., Ghilardi, S., Moss, L. (eds.) Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 9, pp. 239–260. College Publication (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Seligman, J., Girard, P.: Facebook and the epistemic logic of friendship Extended Abstract

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alchourrn, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Schelling, T.C.: Micromotives and Macrobehavior. W. W. Norton and Company (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  11. O’Gorman, H.J.: The discovery of pluralistic ignorance: An ironic lesson. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Science 22, 333–347 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, D.T., McFarland, C.: Pluralistic ignorance; when similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53, 298–305 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prentice, D.A., Miller, D.T.: Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64(2), 243–256 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fields, J.M., Schuman, H.: Public beliefs about the beliefs of the public. The Public Opinion Quarterly 40(4), 427–448 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Gorman, H.J., Garry, S.L.: Pluralistic ignorance – a replication and extension. The Public Opinion Quarterly 40(4), 449–458 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krech, D., Crutchfield, R.S.: Theories and Problems of Social Psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York (1948)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Halbesleben, J.R.B., Buckley, M.R.: Pluralistic ignorance: historical development and organizational applications. Management Decision 42(1), 126–138 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, D.T., McFarland, C.: When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. In: Suls, J., Wills, T. (eds.) Social Comparison: Contemporary Theory and Research, pp. 287–313. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bjerring, J.C., Hansen, J.U., Pedersen, N.J.L.L.: On the rationality of pluralistic ignorance. Synthese (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Areces, C., ten Cate, B.: Hybrid logics. In: Blackburn, P., van Benthem, J., Wolter, F. (eds.) Handbook of Modal Logic, pp. 821–868. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Baltag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements, common knowledge and private suspicious. Technical Report SEN-R9922, CWI, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Syntese Library, vol. 337. Springer, The Netherlands (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Christoff, Z., Hansen, J.U. (2013). A Two-Tiered Formalization of Social Influence. In: Grossi, D., Roy, O., Huang, H. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8196. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40948-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40947-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40948-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics