Skip to main content

An Empirical Investigation of the Component-Based Performance Prediction Method Palladio

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1075 Accesses

Abstract

Model-based performance prediction methods aim at evaluating the expected response time, throughput, and resource utilization of a software system at design time, before implementation, to achieve predictability of the system’s performance characteristics. Existing performance prediction methods use monolithic, throw-away prediction models or component-based, reusable prediction models. While it is intuitively clear that the development of reusable models requires more effort, the actual higher amount of effort had not been quantified or analyzed systematically yet. Furthermore, the achieved prediction accuracy of the methods when applied by developers had not yet been compared. To study this effort, we conducted a controlled experiment with 19 computer science students who predicted the performance of two example systems applying an established, monolithic method (Software Performance Engineering) as well as our own component-based method (Palladio) in 2007. This paper summarizes two earlier papers on this study. The results show that the effort of model creation with Palladio is approximately 1.25 times higher than with SPE in our experimental setting, with the resulting models having comparable prediction accuracy. Therefore, in some cases, the creation of reusable prediction models can already be justified, provided they are reused at least once.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the percentages for the two systems do not equally influence the results, but are weighted by the number of decisions by definition of the metric (cf. [12, p. 41]).

References

  1. Balsamo, S., Di Marco, A., Inverardi, P., Simeoni, M.: Model-based performance prediction in software development: a survey. IEEE TSE 30(5), 295–310 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balsamo S., Marzolla, M.: A simulation-based approach to software performance modeling. In: Proceedings of ESEC/FSE, Helsinki, pp. 363–366. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balsamo, S., Marzolla, M., Di Marco, A., Inverardi, P.: Experimenting different software architectures performance techniques. In: Proceedings of WOSP, Redwood Shores, pp. 115–119. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: The goal question metric approach. In: Marciniak, J.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Software Engineering – 2 Volume Set, pp. 528–532. Wiley, Chichester (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Becker, S., Grunske, L., Mirandola, R., Overhage, S.: Performance prediction of component-based systems: a survey from an engineering perspective. In: Architecting Systems with Trustworthy Components. Volume 3938 of LNCS, pp. 169–192. Springer, Berlin/New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Becker, S., Koziolek, H., Reussner, R.: Model-based performance prediction with the Palladio component model. In: Proceedings of WOSP, Buenos Aires, pp. 54–65. ACM Sigsoft, 5–8 Feb 2007

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bertolino A., Mirandola, R.:CB-SPE tool: putting component-based performance engineering into practice. In: Proceedings of CBSE, Edinburgh. Volume 3054 of LNCS, pp. 233–248. Springer (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bondarev, E., Muskens, J., de With, P.H.N., Chaudron, M.R.V., Lukkien, J.: Predicting real-time properties of component assemblies: a scenario-simulation approach. In: Proceedings of 30th EUROMICRO-Conference, Rennes, pp. 40–47 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gorton I., Liu, A.: Performance evaluation of alternative component architectures for enterprise JavaBean applications. IEEE Internet Comput. 7(3), 18–23. Rennes, France (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Höst, M., Regnell, B., Wohlin, C.: Using students as subjects – a comparative study of students and professionals in lead-time impact assessment. Empir. Softw. Eng. 5(3), 201–214 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Koziolek, H., Firus, V.: Empirical evaluation of model-based performance predictions methods in software development. In: Proceedings of QoSA, Erfurt. Volume 3712 of LNCS, pp 188–202, Sept 2005

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martens, A.: Empirical validation of the model-driven performance prediction approach Palladio. Master’s thesis, Carl-von-Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martens, A., Becker, S., Koziolek, H., Reussner, R.: An empirical investigation of the applicability of a component-based performance prediction method. In: Thomas N., Juiz, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5th European Performance Engineering Workshop (EPEW’08), Palma de Mallorca. Volume 5261 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 17–31. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martens, A., Becker, S., Koziolek, H., Reussner, R.: An empirical investigation of the effort of creating reusable models for performance prediction. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE’08), Karlsruhe. Volume 5282 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 16–31. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martens, A., Koziolek, H., Prechelt, L., Reussner, R.: From monolithic to component-based performance evaluation of software architectures. Empir. Soft. Eng. 16(5), 587–622 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Menascé, D.A., Almeida, V.A.F., Dowdy, L.W.: Performance by Design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Petriu, D.C. Wang, X.: From UML description of high-level software architecture to LQN performance models. In: Nagl, M., Schürr, A., Münch, M. (eds.) Proceedings of AGTIVE’99, Kerkrade, vol. 1779. Springer, Berlin/New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sachs, L.: Applied Statistics: A Handbook of Techniques. Springer, New York (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, C.U.: Performance Engineering of Software Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G.: Performance Solutions: A Practical Guide to Creating Responsive, Scalable Software. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Szyperski, C.: Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming. ACM,New York/Addison-Wesley, Reading (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Welch, B.L.: The generalization of student’s problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika 34, 28–35 (1947)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer Academic, Norwell (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu X., Woodside, M.: Performance Modeling from Software Components. SIGSOFT SE Notes 29(1), 290–301 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Walter Tichy, Lutz Prechelt, and Wilhelm Hasselbring for their kind review of the experimental design and fruitful comments. Furthermore, we thank all members of the SDQ Chair for helping to prepare and conduct the experiment. Last, but not least, we thank all students who volunteered to participate in our experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Reussner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reussner, R., Becker, S., Koziolek, A., Koziolek, H. (2013). An Empirical Investigation of the Component-Based Performance Prediction Method Palladio. In: Münch, J., Schmid, K. (eds) Perspectives on the Future of Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37395-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37395-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37394-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37395-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics