Skip to main content

Supporting Tabular Data Characterization in a Large Scale Data Infrastructure by Lexical Matching Techniques

  • Conference paper
Digital Libraries and Archives (IRCDL 2012)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 354))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Digital Libraries continue to evolve towards research environments supporting access and management of multiform Information Objects spread across multiple data sources and organizational domains. This evolution has introduced the need to deal with Information Objects having traits different from those characterizing Digital Libraries at their early stages and to revise the services supporting their management. Tabular data represent a class of Information Objects that require to be efficiently managed because of their core role in many eScience scenarios. This paper discusses the tabular data characterization problem, i.e., the problem of identifying the reference dataset of any column of the dataset. In particular, the paper presents an approach based on lexical matching techniques to support users during the data curation phase by providing them with a ranked list of reference datasets suitable for a dataset column.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data - the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems 5(3), 1–22 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blanke, T., Candela, L., Hedges, M., Priddy, M., Simeoni, F.: Deploying general-purpose virtual research environments for humanities research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 368, 3813–3828 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Borgman, C.: Research data: Who will share what, with whom, when, and why? In: China-North America Library Conference, Beijing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borgman, C.: The Conundrum of Sharing Research Data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 1–40 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Candela, L., Akal, F., Avancini, H., Castelli, D., Fusco, L., Guidetti, V., Langguth, C., Manzi, A., Pagano, P., Schuldt, H., Simi, M., Springmann, M., Voicu, L.: DILIGENT: integrating Digital Library and Grid Technologies for a new Earth Observation Research Infrastructure. International Journal on Digital Libraries 7(1-2), 59–80 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Candela, L., Castelli, D., Pagano, P.: History, Evolution and Impact of Digital Libraries. In: Iglezakis, I., Synodinou, T.-E., Kapidakis, S. (eds.) E-Publishing and Digital Libraries: Legal and Organizational Issues, ch. 1, pp. 1–30. IGI Global (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Candela, L., Castelli, D., Pagano, P., Simi, M.: From Heterogeneous Information Spaces to Virtual Documents. In: Fox, E.A., Neuhold, E.J., Premsmit, P., Wuwongse, V. (eds.) ICADL 2005. LNCS, vol. 3815, pp. 11–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Castelli, D.: D4Science-II - An e-Infrastructure Ecosystem for Science. ERCIM News 79, 9 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crane, G., Babeu, A., Bamman, D.: eScience and the humanities. International Journal on Digital Libraries 7(1-2), 117–122 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gorp, P.V., Mazanek, S.: SHARE: a web portal for creating and sharing executable research papers. Procedia CS 4, 589–597 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamming, R.W.: Error detecting and error correcting codes. Bell System Technical Journal 29(2), 147–160 (1950)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Hey, T., Tansley, S., Tolle, K.: The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jaro, M.A.: Advances in record linkage methodology as applied to the 1985 census of tampa florida. Journal of the American Statistical Society 84(406), 414–420 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krause, E.F.: Taxicab Geometry. Dover Publications (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lave, J., Wenger: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cam (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Levenshtein, V.: Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions and Reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10, 707–710 (1966)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. National Archives and Records Administration. The Soundex Indexing System (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Needleman, S.B., Wunsch, C.D.: A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology 48(3), 443–453 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nowakowski, P., Ciepiela, E., Harezlak, D., Kocot, J., Kasztelnik, M., Bartynski, T., Meizner, J., Dyk, G., Malawski, M.: The collage authoring environment. Procedia CS 4, 608–617 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roure, D.D., Goble, C.A., Stevens, R.: The design and realisation of the myexperiment virtual research environment for social sharing of workflows. Future Generation Comp. Syst. 25(5), 561–567 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shen, R., Vemuri, N.S., Fan, W., Fox, E.A.: Integration of complex archaeology digital libraries: An ETANA-DL experience. Information Systems 33(7-8), 699–723 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, T.F., Waterman, M.S.: Identification of common molecular subsequences. Journal of Molecular Biology 147, 195–197 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stapleton, L.K.: Taming Big Data. IBM Data Management Magazine 16(2), 12–18 (2011)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Wallis, J.C., Mayernik, M.S., Borgman, C.L., Pepe, A.: Digital libraries for scientific data discovery and reuse: from vision to practical reality. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, JCDL 2010, pp. 333–340. ACM, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Winkler, W.E.: String Comparator Metrics and Enhanced Decision Rules in the Fellegi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. In: Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods (American Statistical Association), pp. 354–359 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Candela, L., Coro, G., Pagano, P. (2013). Supporting Tabular Data Characterization in a Large Scale Data Infrastructure by Lexical Matching Techniques. In: Agosti, M., Esposito, F., Ferilli, S., Ferro, N. (eds) Digital Libraries and Archives. IRCDL 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 354. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35834-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35834-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35833-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35834-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics