Skip to main content

Block-Structured Plan Deordering

  • Conference paper
AI 2012: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7691))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Partially ordered plans have several useful properties, such as exhibiting the structure of the plan more clearly which facilitates post-plan generation tasks like scheduling the plan, explaining it to a user, or breaking it into subplans for distributed execution. The standard interpretation of partial ordering implies that whenever two subplans are unordered, every interleaving of steps from the two forms a valid execution. This restricts deordering to cases where individual steps (i.e., actions) are independent. We propose a weaker notion of partial ordering that divides the plan into blocks, such that the steps in a block may not be interleaved with steps outside the block, but unordered blocks can be executed in any sequence. We present an algorithm to find such deorderable blocks, and show that it enables deordering plans in many cases where no deordering is possible under the standard interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bäckström, C.: Computational aspects of reordering plans. Journal of AI Research 9, 99–137 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Policella, N., Smith, S., Cesta, A., Oddi, A.: Generating robust schedules through temporal flexibility. In: Proc. 14th International Conference on Automated Planning & Scheduling (ICAPS 2004), pp. 209–218 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cox, J., Durfee, E., Bartold, T.: A distributed framework for solving the multiagent plan coordination problem. In: Proc. 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2005), pp. 821–827 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chrpa, L., McCluskey, T., Osborne, H.: Optimizing plans through analysis of action dependencies and independencies. In: Proc. 22nd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghallab, M., Nau, D., Traverso, P.: Automated Planning: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (2004) ISBN: 1-55860-856-7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chapman, D.: Planning for conjunctive goals. Artificial Intelligence 32, 333–377 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. McAllester, D., Rosenblitt, D.: Systematic nonlinear planning. In: Proc. 9th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pednault, E.: Formulating multiagent, dynamic-world problems in the classical planning framework. In: Reasoning about Actions and Plans (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Regnier, P., Fade, B.: Complete Determination of Parallel Actions and Temporal Optimization in Linear Plans of Action. In: Hertzberg, J. (ed.) EWSP 1991. LNCS, vol. 522, pp. 100–111. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Veloso, M.M., Pérez, M.A., Carbonell, J.G.: Nonlinear planning with parallel resource allocation. In: Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Planning, Scheduling and Control, pp. 207–212. Morgan Kaufmann (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kambhampati, S., Kedar, S.: A unified framework for explanation-based generalization of partially ordered and partially instantiated plans. Artificial Intelligence 67(1), 29–70 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Winner, E., Veloso, M.: Analyzing plans with conditional effects. In: Proc. 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling (AIPS 2002), pp. 23–33 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Muise, C., McIlratih, S., Beck, J.: Optimally relaxing partial-order plans with MaxSAT. In: Proc. 22nd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chrpa, L., Barták, R.: Towards getting domain knowledge: Plans analysis through investigation of actions dependencies. In: Proc. 21st International Florida AI Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2008), pp. 531–536. AAAI Press (2008) ISBN 978-1-57735-365-2

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haslum, P., Jonsson, P.: Planning with reduced operator sets. In: Proc. 5:th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling (AIPS 2000), pp. 150–158 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen, X., Kambhampati, S.: Reviving partial order planning. In: Proc. 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Siddiqui, F.H., Haslum, P. (2012). Block-Structured Plan Deordering. In: Thielscher, M., Zhang, D. (eds) AI 2012: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7691. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35101-3_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35101-3_68

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35100-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35101-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics