Skip to main content

Ad Auctions with Data

  • Conference paper
Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7615))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The holy grail of online advertising is to target users with ads matched to their needs with such precision that the users respond to the ads, thereby increasing both advertisers’ and users’ value. The current approach to this challenge utilizes information about the users: their gender, their location, the websites they have visited before, and so on. Incorporating this data in ad auctions poses an economic challenge: can this be done in a way that the auctioneer’s revenue does not decrease (at least on average)? This is the problem we study in this paper. Our main result is that in Myerson’s optimal mechanism, for a general model of data in auctions, additional data leads to additional expected revenue. In the context of ad auctions we show that for the simple and common mechanisms, namely second price auction with reserve prices, there are instances in which additional data decreases the expected revenue, but this decrease is by at most a small constant factor under a standard regularity assumption.

Work done while the authors were at Yahoo! Reseaerch

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abraham, I., Athey, S., Babaioff, M., Grubb, M.: Peaches, lemons, and cookies: Designing auction markets with dispersed information (2011) (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alon, N., Feldman, M., Gamzu, I., Tennenholtz, M.: The asymmetric matrix partition problem (manuscript, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Babaioff, M., Kleinberg, R., Leme, R.P.: Optimal mechanisms for selling information. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 92–109 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beck, M., Milgrom, P.: Auctions, adverse selection and internet display advertising. Working paper (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Board, S.: Revealing information in auctions: the allocation effect. Econ. Theory 38, 125–135 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bulow, J., Roberts, J.: The simple economics of optimal auctions. The Journal of Political Economy 97(5), 1060–1090 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Celis, L.E., Lewis, G., Mobius, M., Nazerzadeh, H.: Buy-it-now or take-a-chance: A simple sequential screening mechanism. In: WWW (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.: Fairness through awareness. In: ITCS (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emek, Y., Feldman, M., Gamzu, I., Leme, R.P., Tennenholtz, M.: Signaling schemes for revenue maximization. In: ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghosh, A., Mahdian, M., McAfee, R.P., Vassilvitskii, S.: To match or not to match: Economics of cookie matching in online advertising. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hartline, J.D., Karlin, A.R.: Profit maximization in mechanism design. In: Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, É., Vazirani, V.V. (eds.) Algorithmic Game Theory, ch. 13. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hartline, J.D., Roughgarden, T.: Simple versus optimal mechanisms. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 225–234 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levin, J., Milgrom, P.: Online advertising: Heterogeneity and conflation in market design. American Economic Review 100(2), 603–607 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McAfee, R.P.: When does improved targeting increase revenue? Working paper, private communication (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Milgrom, P., Weber, R.J.: A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50(5), 1089–1122 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Miltersen, P.B., Sheffet, O.: Send mixed signals — earn more, work less. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Myerson, R.: Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6(1), 58–73 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Palfrey, T.R.: Bundling decisions by a multiproduct monopolist with incomplete information. Econometrica 51(2), 463–483 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fu, H., Jordan, P., Mahdian, M., Nadav, U., Talgam-Cohen, I., Vassilvitskii, S. (2012). Ad Auctions with Data. In: Serna, M. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7615. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33996-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33996-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33995-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33996-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics