Skip to main content

A Comparison between Cognitive and AI Models of Blackjack Strategy Learning

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7526))

Abstract

Cognitive models of blackjack playing are presented and investigated. Blackjack playing is considered a useful test case for theories on human learning. Curiously, despite the existence of a relatively simple, well-known and optimal strategy for blackjack, empirical studies have found that casino players play quite differently from that strategy. The computational models presented here attempt to explain this result by modelling blackjack playing using the cognitive architecture CHREST. Two approaches to modeling are investigated and compared; (i) the combination of classical and operant conditioning, as studied in psychology, and (ii) SARSA, as studied in AI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   72.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gobet, F., Lane, P.C.R., Croker, S., Cheng, P.C.H., Jones, G., Oliver, I., Pine, J.M.: Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5, 236–243 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Perez-Uribe, A., Sanchez, E.: Blackjack as a test bed for learning strategies in neural networks. In: IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 1998, vol. 3, pp. 2022–2027 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kendall, G., Smith, C.: The evolution of blackjack strategies. In: The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2003, vol. 4, pp. 2474–2481 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wagenaar, W.: Paradoxes of gambling behaviour. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thorp, E.: Beat the dealer: A winning strategy for the game of twenty-one: A scientific analysis of the world-wide game known variously as blackjack, twenty-one, vingt-et-un, pontoon or Van John. Blaisdell Pub. Co. (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walker, M., Sturevska, S., Turpie, D.: The quality of play in Australian casinos. In: Finding the Edge: Mathematical Analysis of Casino Games. Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chau, A.W.L., Phillips, J.G., Von Baggo, K.L.: Departures from sensible play in computer blackjack. Journal of General Psychology 127(4), 426–438 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Widrow, B., Gupta, N.K., Maitra, S.: Punish/reward: Learning with a critic in adaptive threshold systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 3, 455–465 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Wetzels, R., Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., Wagenmakers, E.J.: Bayesian parameter estimation in the expectancy valence model of the Iowa gambling task. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 54, 14–27 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Busemeyer, J.R., Stout, J.C.: A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment 14, 253–262 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Simon, H.A., Chase, W.G.: Skill in chess: Experiments with chess-playing tasks and computer simulation of skilled performance throw light on some human perceptual and memory processes. American Scientist, 394–403 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gobet, F., Simon, H.A.: Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology 31, 1–40 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ekman, P.: Basic emotions. In: Handbook of Cognition and Emotion. Wiley (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Plutchik, R.: Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. Harper & Row, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rescorla, R.A., Wagner, A.R.: A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Black, A.H., Prokasy, W.F. (eds.) Classical Conditioning II: Current Research and Theory, pp. 64–99. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York (1972)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schiller, M.R.G., Gobet, F.R. (2012). A Comparison between Cognitive and AI Models of Blackjack Strategy Learning. In: Glimm, B., Krüger, A. (eds) KI 2012: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7526. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33347-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33347-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33346-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33347-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics