Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Argumentative Agents for Service-Oriented Computing

  • Chapter
Multiagent Systems and Applications

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 45))

  • 986 Accesses

Abstract

We propose an argumentation-based agent model that supports service and partner selection in service-oriented computing settings. In this model, argumentation is also used to help agents resolve conflicts between themselves, whenever negotiation is required for the provision of complex services. The model relies upon an argumentation framework that is used in a modular architecture where Knowledge, Goals, Decisions and Priorities are manipulated by three specialized modules dealing with decision making, communication and negotiation.We formulate a distributed e-procurement process to illustrate how our agents select services and partners and can negotiate with one another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amgoud, L.: A general argumentation framework for inference and decision making. In: Fahiem Bacchus, T.J. (ed.) Proc. of the 21st Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), pp. 26–33. AUAI Press, Edinburgh (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amgoud, L., Dimopoulos, Y., Moraitis, P.: A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In: Proc. 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Honolulu, Hawaii, pp. 963–970 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Comparing decisions in an argumentation-based setting. In: Proc. of the 11th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR), Session on Argumentation, Dialogue, and Decision Making, Lake District, UK, pp. 426–432 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amgoud, L., Prade, H.: Explaining qualitative decision under uncertainty by argumentation. In: Proc. of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), Boston, pp. 16–20 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Martelli, A., Patti, V.: Reasoning about interaction protocols for web service composition. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 105, 21–36 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Martelli, A., Patti, V.: Reasoning about interaction protocols for customizing web service selection and composition. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 70(1), 53–73 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bench-Capon, T., Prakken, H.: Justifying actions by accruing arguments. In: Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, pp. 247–258. IOS Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bentahar, J., Maamar, Z., Benslimane, D., Thiran, P.: An argumentation framework for communities of web services. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22(6), 75–83 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bracciali, A., Demetriou, N., Endriss, U., Kakas, A., Lu, W., Stathis, K.: Crafting the mind of PROSOCS agents. Applied Artificial Intelligence 20(2-4), 105–131 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bromuri, S., Stathis, K.: Situating cognitive agents in GOLEM. In: Weyns, D., Brueckner, S., Demazeau, Y. (eds.) Proc. of the Engineering Environment-Mediated Multiagent Systems Conference (EEMMAS), pp. 76–93. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bromuri, S., Stathis, K.: Distributed Agent Environments in the Ambient Event Calculus. In: DEBS 2009: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, W., Warren, D.S.: C-logic of Complex Objects. In: PODS 1989: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pp. 369–378. ACM Press, New York (1989)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Clemen, R.T.: Making Hard Decisions. Duxbury Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen, M., Stathis, K.: Strategic change stemming from e-commerce: Implications of multi-agent systems in the supply chain. Strategic Change 10, 139–149 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Curcin, V., Ghanem, M., Guo, Y., Stathis, K., Toni, F.: Building next generation Service-Oriented Architectures using Argumentation Agents. In: 3rd International Conference on Grid Services Engineering and Management (GSEM 2006), Germany (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dean, M., Schreiber, G., Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A.: OWL web ontology language reference. Tech. rep., W3C (2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210/

  17. Sierra, C., Dignum, F. (eds.): AgentLink 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1991. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77(2), 321–357 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence 170(2), 114–159 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Dung, P.M., Mancarella, P., Toni, F.: Computing ideal sceptical argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, Special Issue on Argumentation 171(10-15), 642–674 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Bellifemine, F.L., Giovanni Caire, Greenwood, D.: Developing Multi-Agent Systems with JADE. Wiley (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Foster, I.T., Jennings, N.R., Kesselman, C.: Brain meets brawn: Why grid and agents need each other. In: 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 8–15. IEEE Computer Society, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gartner, D., Toni, F.: CaSAPI: a system for credulous and sceptical argumentation. In: Simari, G., Torroni, P. (eds.) Proc. of the Workshop on Argumentation for Non-monotonic Reasoning (ArgNMR), pp. 80–95 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ghanem, M., Azam, N., Boniface, M., Ferris, J.: Grid-enabled workflows for industrial product design. In: Proc. of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (e-Science 2006). IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description logic programs: Combining logic programs with description logic. In: Proc. of the Twelfth International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), pp. 48–57. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Howden, N., Ronnquist, R., Hodgson, A., Lucas, A.: Jack - summary of an agent infrastructure. In: 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huhns, M.N., Singh, M.P.: Service-oriented computing: Key concepts and principles. IEEE Internet Computing 9(1), 75–81 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huhns, M.N., Singh, M.P., Burstein, M.H., Decker, K.S., Durfee, E.H., Finin, T.W., Gasser, L., Goradia, H.J., Jennings, N.R., Lakkaraju, K., Nakashima, H., Parunak, H.V.D., Rosenschein, J.S., Ruvinsky, A., Sukthankar, G., Swarup, S., Sycara, K.P., Tambe, M., Wagner, T., Gutierrez, R.L.Z.: Research directions for service-oriented multiagent systems. IEEE Internet Computing 9(6), 65–70 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Argumentative-based decision-making for autonomous agents. In: Proc. of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 883–890. ACM Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Adaptive agent negotiation via argumentation. In: Proc. 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Hakodate, Japan, pp. 384–391 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P., Sadri, F., Stathis, K., Toni, F.: The KGP model of agency. In: Proc. of ECAI, pp. 33–37 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P., Sadri, F., Stathis, K., Toni, F.: Declarative Agent Control. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P. (eds.) CLIMA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3487, pp. 96–110. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P., Sadri, F., Stathis, K., Toni, F.: Computational logic foundations of kgp agents. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 33, 285–348 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Lomuscio, A., Qu, H., Sergot, M.J., Solanki, M.: Verifying Temporal and Epistemic Properties of Web Service Compositions. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 456–461. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Lymberopoulos, L., Bromuri, S., Stathis, K., Kafetzoglou, S., Grammatikou, M.: Towards a p2p discovery framework for an argumentative agent technology assisted grid. In: Proc. of the CoreGRID Workshop on Grid Programming Model, Grid and P2P systems Arhcitectures, Grid Systems, Tools, and Environments, Crete, Greece (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lymberopoulos, L., Papavassiliou, S., Maglaris, V.: A novel load balancing mechanism for P2P networking. In: Proc. of ACM Sponsored Conference GridNets, Lyon, France (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mamdani, E., Pitt, J., Stathis, K.: Connected Communities from the standpoint of Multi-agent Systems. New Generation Computing 17(4) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maximilien, E.M., Singh, M.P.: A framework and ontology for dynamic web services selection. IEEE Internet Computing 8(5), 84–93 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Maximilien, E.M., Singh, M.P.: Toward autonomic web services trust and selection. In: Aiello, M., Aoyama, M., Curbera, F., Papazoglou, M.P. (eds.) Service-Oriented Computing - ICSOC 2004, pp. 212–221. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. McBurmey, P., Parsons, S.: Games that agents play: A formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11(3), 315–334 (2002), Special Issue on Logic and Games

    Google Scholar 

  41. McGinnis, J., Stathis, K., Toni, F.: A formal model of agent-oriented virtual organisations and their formation. Multiagent and Grid Systems 7(6), 291–310 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  42. McIlraith, S.A., Son, T.C.: Adapting golog for composition of semantic web services. In: Fensel, D., Giunchiglia, F., McGuinness, D.L., Williams, M.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Principles and Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2002), pp. 482–496. Morgan Kaufmann, France (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  43. McIlraith, S.A., Son, T.C., Zeng, H.: Semantic web services. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(2), 46–53 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Miller, T., McBurney, P.: Using Constraints and Process Algebra for Specification of First-Class Agent Interaction Protocols. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds.) ESAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4457, pp. 245–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Morge, M.: The Hedgehog and the Fox. In: Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., Reed, C. (eds.) ArgMAS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4946, pp. 114–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Morge, M.: Arguing over goals for negotiation: Adopting an assumption-based argumentation decision support system. In: Jao, C. (ed.) Efficient Decision Support Systems - Practice and Challenges From Current to Future, ch. 12, pp. 211–240. InTech (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Oren, N., Panagiotidi, S., Vázquez-Salceda, J., Modgil, S., Luck, M., Miles, S.: Towards a formalisation of electronic contracting environments. In: COIN@AAMAS&AAAI, pp. 156–171 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ouerdane, W., Maudet, N., Tsoukias, A.: Arguing over Actions That Involve Multiple Criteria: A Critical Review. In: Mellouli, K. (ed.) ECSQARU 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4724, pp. 308–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Overeinder, B.J., Brazier, F.M.T., Marin, O.: Fault tolerance in scalable agent support systems: Integrating darx in the agentscape framework. In: Proc. of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGrid), pp. 688–696. IEEE Computer Society, Japan (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Papazoglou, M.P.: Service-oriented computing: Concepts, characteristics and directions. In: 4th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE 2003), pp. 3–12. IEEE Computer Society, Italy (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Payne, T.R.: Web services from an agent perspective. IEEE Intelligent Systems 23(2), 12–14 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rahwan, I.: Argumentation in multi-agent systems. Guest Editorial: Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 11(2), 115–125 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, L.: Argumentation-based negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(4), 343–375 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ricci, A., Buda, C., Zaghini, N., Natali, A., Viroli, M., Omicini, A.: simpa-ws: An agent-oriented computing technology for ws-based soa applications. In: Paoli, F.D., Stefano, A.D., Omicini, A., Santoro, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th WOA 2006 Workshop, From Objects to Agents (Dagli Oggetti Agli Agenti), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org, Italy (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Robertson, D.: Multi-agent Coordination as Distributed Logic Programming. In: Demoen, B., Lifschitz, V. (eds.) ICLP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3132, pp. 416–430. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  56. Sreenath, R.M., Singh, M.P.: Agent-based service selection. Journal of Web Semantics 1(3), 261–279 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Stathis, K., Kakas, A.C., Lu, W., Demetriou, N., Endriss, U., Bracciali, A.: PROSOCS: a platform for programming software agents in computational logic. In: Müller, J., Petta, P. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium From Agent Theory to Agent Implementation (AT2AI 2004 – EMCSR 2004 Session M), Vienna, Austria, pp. 523–528 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stournaras, T. (ed.): eBusiness application scenarios. Deliverable document D1.2 ARGUGRID (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sycara, K., Paolucci, M., Velsen, M.V., Giampapa, J.: The retsina mas infrastructure. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 7(1-2), 29–48 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Toni, F.: Argumentative kgp agents for service composition. In: Proc. AITA 2008, Architectures for Intelligent Theory-Based Agents, AAAI Spring Symposium. Stanford University, USA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Urovi, V., Stathis, K.: Playing with agent coordination patterns in MAGE. In: Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems (COIN@AAMAS 2009), Budapest, Hungary (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Vreeswijk, G.: Abstract argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence 90(1-2), 225–279 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  63. Weyns, D., Omicini, A., Odell, J.: Environment as a first-class abstraction in multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 14(1), 5–30 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université Lille 1, Lille, France

    M. Morge

  2. Press Association, London, UK

    J. McGinnis

  3. University of Applied Science, Western Switzerland, Delémon, Switzerland

    S. Bromuri

  4. Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy

    P. Mancarella

  5. Royal Holloway, University of London, London, UK

    K. Stathis

  6. Imperial College, London, UK

    F. Toni

Authors
  1. M. Morge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. McGinnis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Bromuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Mancarella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. Stathis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. Toni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Morge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Institute of Informatics, University of Gdańsk, ul. Wita Stwosza 57 80-952, Gdańsk, Poland

    Maria Ganzha

  2. , School of Electrical and, University of South Australia, South Australia, 5095, Australia

    Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morge, M., McGinnis, J., Bromuri, S., Mancarella, P., Stathis, K., Toni, F. (2013). Argumentative Agents for Service-Oriented Computing. In: Ganzha, M., Jain, L. (eds) Multiagent Systems and Applications. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 45. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33323-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33323-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33322-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33323-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation