Skip to main content

Satellite Rendezvous and Conjunction Avoidance: Case Studies in Verification of Nonlinear Hybrid Systems

  • Conference paper
FM 2012: Formal Methods (FM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7436))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Satellite systems are beginning to incorporate complex autonomous operations, which calls for rigorous reliability assurances. Human operators usually plan satellite maneuvers in detail, but autonomous operation will require software to make decisions using noisy sensor data and problem solutions with numerical inaccuracies. For such systems, formal verification guarantees are particularly attractive. This paper presents automatic verification techniques for providing assurances in satellite maneuvers. The specific reliability criteria studied are rendezvous and conjunction avoidance for two satellites performing orbital transfers. Three factors pose challenges for verifying satellite systems: (a) incommensurate orbits, (b) uncertainty of orbital parameters after thrusting, and (c) nonlinear dynamics. Three abstractions are proposed for contending with these challenges: (a) quotienting of the state-space based on periodicity of the orbital dynamics, (b) aggregation of similar transfer orbits, and (c) overapproximation of nonlinear dynamics using hybridization. The method’s feasibility is established via experiments with a prototype tool that computes the abstractions and uses existing hybrid systems model checkers.

Most of this research was conducted under the Air Force’s 2011 Summer Faculty Fellowship Program and Space Scholars Program at the Air Force Research Laboratory at Kirtland Air Force Base. The Illinois researchers were also supported by NSF CAREER Grant 1054247.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allgeier, S.E., Fitz-Coy, N.G., Erwin, R.S., Lovell, T.A.: Metrics for mission planning of formation flight. In: Proc. AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Girdwood, AK (July 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Althoff, M., Stursberg, O., Buss, M.: Reachability analysis of nonlinear systems with uncertain parameters using conservative linearization. In: 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 4042–4048 (December 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Althoff, M., Le Guernic, C., Krogh, B.H.: Reachable set computation for uncertain time-varying linear systems. In: Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC), pp. 93–102. ACM, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Althoff, M., Rajhans, A., Krogh, B., Yaldiz, S., Li, X., Pileggi, L.: Formal verification of phase-locked loops using reachability analysis and continuization. In: IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, ICCAD (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alur, R., Courcoubetis, C., Halbwachs, N., Henzinger, T.A., Ho, P.-H., Nicollin, X., Olivero, A., Sifakis, J., Yovine, S.: The algorithmic analysis of hybrid systems. Theoretical Computer Science 138(1), 3–34 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Asarin, E., Dang, T., Girard, A.: Hybridization methods for the analysis of nonlinear systems. Acta Informatica 43, 451–476 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bate, R.R., Mueller, D.D., White, J.E.: Fundamentals of Astrodynamics. Dover (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Battin, R.H.: An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics. AIAA education series. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bosse, A.B., Barnds, W.J., Brown, M.A., Creamer, N.G., Feerst, A., Henshaw, C.G., Hope, A.S., Kelm, B.E., Klein, P.A., Pipitone, F., Plourde, B.E., Whalen, B.P.: Sumo: Spacecraft for the Universal Modification of Orbits. In: Proc. of SPIE, vol. 5419, pp. 36–46 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dang, T., Maler, O., Testylier, R.: Accurate hybridization of nonlinear systems. In: Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC), pp. 11–20. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flieller, D., Riedinger, P., Louis, J.P.: Computation and stability of limit cycles in hybrid systems. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods, & Applications 64(2), 352–367 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Frehse, G.: PHAVer: Algorithmic Verification of Hybrid Systems Past HyTech. In: Morari, M., Thiele, L. (eds.) HSCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3414, pp. 258–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Frehse, G., Le Guernic, C., Donzé, A., Cotton, S., Ray, R., Lebeltel, O., Ripado, R., Girard, A., Dang, T., Maler, O.: SpaceEx: Scalable Verification of Hybrid Systems. In: Gopalakrishnan, G., Qadeer, S. (eds.) CAV 2011. LNCS, vol. 6806, pp. 379–395. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurfil, P., Kholshevnikov, K.V.: Manifolds and metrics in the relative spacecraft motion problem. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics 29(4), 1004–1010 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Henzinger, T.A., Ho, P.-H., Wong-Toi, H.: Hytech: a model checker for hybrid systems. Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer 1, 110–122 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaynar, D.K., Lynch, N., Segala, R., Vaandrager, F.: The Theory of Timed I/O Automata. Synthesis Lectures in Computer Science. Morgan & Claypool (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kurzhanskiy, A.A., Varaiya, P.: Ellipsoidal toolbox. In: 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 1498–1503 (December 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lynch, N., Segala, R., Vaandrager, F.: Hybrid i/o automata. Inf. Comput. 185(1), 105–157 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Masur, H., Tabachnikov, S.: Rational billiards and flat structures. In: Hasselblatt, B., Katok, A. (eds.) Handbook of Dynamical Systems, Handbook of Dynamical Systems, vol. 1 Part A, ch. 13, pp. 1015–1089. Elsevier Science (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ocampo, C.: Finite burn maneuver modeling for a generalized spacecraft trajectory design and optimization system. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1017(1), 210–233 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Römgens, B.A., Mooij, E., Naeije, M.C.: Verified interval orbit propagation in satellite collision avoidance. In: Proc. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control, Portland, OR (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vallado, D.A., McClain, W.D.: Fundamentals of astrodynamics and applications. Space technology library. Microcosm Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Johnson, T.T., Green, J., Mitra, S., Dudley, R., Erwin, R.S. (2012). Satellite Rendezvous and Conjunction Avoidance: Case Studies in Verification of Nonlinear Hybrid Systems. In: Giannakopoulou, D., MĂ©ry, D. (eds) FM 2012: Formal Methods. FM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7436. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32759-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32759-9_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32758-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32759-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics