Introduction
The goal of this paper is to provide the formal basis for a new approach to modelling the application of vague predicates like tall and bald to plural subjects like John and Mary and the men. In other words, we are interested in developing a new logical analysis for natural language sentences like Mary is tall and The men are bald. In the past 30 years, much research has been devoted to finding the proper logical framework to model the application of non-vague predicates to pluralities (cf. [16], [21] among others). Additionally, there has been a lot of work on how to model the application of vague predicates to singular terms (cf. [8], [5] among many others). However, the question of how to apply vague predicates to plural subjects and what complexities may arise in doing so has yet to be examined. This paper is a contribution to filling this gap. In particular, I argue that extending an analysis of predicate vagueness to incorporate pluralities is not immediately straightforward; that is, I show that sentences with vague predicates and certain kinds of plural subjects give rise to additional vague effects that are not present with singular subjects. Extending previous work on both plural predication and vague language, I propose a new logical system (Plural TCS) that models these effects.
This research has been partially supported by a SSHRC doctoral grant to the author (#752-2007-2382) and the TELCAS grant (UCLA/École normale supérieure (Paris)) from the Partner University Fund. I thank Paul Égré, Thomas Graf, Ed Keenan, Friederike Moltmann, Dominique Sportiche, and Ed Stabler for helpful comments and discussion. Of course, all errors are my own.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brisson, C.: Plurals, ALL and the Non-uniformity of Collective Predication. Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 129–184 (2003)
Burnett, H.: The Grammar of Tolerance: On Vagueness, Context-Sensitivity, and the Origin of Scale Structure. PhD Thesis. University of California, Los Angeles (2012)
Champollion, L.: Parts of a Whole: Distributivity as a Bridge between Aspect and Measurement. PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania (2011)
Chierchia, G.: Mass Nouns, Vagueness and Semantic Variation. Synthese 174, 99–149 (2010)
Cobreros, P., Égré, P., Ripley, D., van Rooij, R.: Tolerant, Classical, Strict. Journal of Philosophical Logic (2011) (forthcoming)
Dowty, D.: Collective predicates, Distributive predicates, and all. In: Marshall, F. (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd ESCOL, pp. 97–115. Ohio State University, Ohio (1987)
Fara, D.: Shifting Sands: An interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics 20, 45–81 (2000)
Fine, K.: Vagueness, Truth and Logic. Synthese 30, 265–300 (1975)
Hovda, P.: What is Classical Mereology? Journal of Philosophical Logic 38, 55–82 (2009)
Keenan, E., Faltz, L.: Boolean Semantics for Natural Language. Riedel, Dordrecht (1985)
Kennedy, C.: Vagueness and Grammar: The study of relative and absolute gradable predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 30, 1–45 (2007)
Krifka, M.: Approximate Interpretation of Number Words: A Case for Strategic Communication. In: Bouma, G., Krämer, I., Zwarts, J. (eds.) Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschapen, Amsterdam, pp. 111–126 (2007)
Lasersohn, P.: Pragmatic Halos. Language 75, 522–571 (1999)
Lappin, S.: An Intensional Parametric Semantics for Vague Quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 599–620 (2000)
Lewis, D.: Score-keeping in the Language Game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339–359 (1979)
Link, G.: The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Nouns. In: Bauerle, R., Schwartze, C., von Stechow, A. (eds.) Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, pp. 302–322. Mouton de Gruyter, The Hague (1983)
Malamud, S.: Non-Maximality and Distributivity: A Decision-Theoretic Approach. In: The Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 16, Tokyo, Japan (2006)
Montague, R.: The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English. In: Thomason, R. (ed.) Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, pp. 247–270. Yale University Press, New Haven (1974)
Pinkal, M.: Logic and Lexicon. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1995)
Pogonowski, J.: Tolerance Spaces with Applications in Linguistics. Poznan University Press, Poznan (1981)
Rayo, A.: Word and Objects. Noûs 36, 436–464 (2002)
Simons, P.: Parts. MIT Press, Cambridge
Smith, N.: Vagueness and Degrees of Truth. OUP, Oxford (2008)
Unger, P.: Ignorance. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1975)
Wright, C.: On the Coherence of Vague Predicates. Synthese 30, 325–365 (1975)
Yoon, Y.: Total and Partial Predicates and the Weak and Strong Interpretations. Natural Language Semantics 4, 217–236 (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Burnett, H. (2012). Vague Determiner Phrases and Distributive Predication. In: Lassiter, D., Slavkovik, M. (eds) New Directions in Logic, Language and Computation. ESSLLI ESSLLI 2010 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7415. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31467-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31467-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31466-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31467-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)