Skip to main content

Ascribing Causality from Interventional Belief Function Knowledge

  • Conference paper
Book cover Belief Functions: Theory and Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 164))

  • 1144 Accesses

Abstract

In many Artificial Intelligence applications, causality is an important issue. Interventions are external manipulations that alter the natural behavior of the system. They have been used as tools to distinguish causal relations from spurious correlations. This paper proposes a model allowing the detection of causal relationships under the belief function framework resulting from acting on some events. Facilitation and justification in the presence of interventions, concepts complementary to the concept of causality, are also discussed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benferhat, S.: Interventions and belief change in possibilistic graphical models. Artif. Intell. 174(2), 177–189 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Benferhat, S., Bonnefon, J.-F., Chassy, P., Da Silva Neves, R., Dubois, D., Dupin de Saint-Cyr, F., Kayser, D., Nouioua, F., Nouioua-Boutouhami, S., Prade, H., Smaoui, S.: A Comparative Study of Six Formal Models of Causal Ascription. In: Greco, S., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds.) SUM 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5291, pp. 47–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Benferhat, S., Smaoui, S.: Possibilistic causal networks for handling interventions: A new propagation algorithm. In: AAAI, pp. 373–378. AAAI Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benferhat, S., Smaoui, S.: Quantitative Possibilistic Networks: Handling Interventions and Ascribing Causality. In: Gelbukh, A., Morales, E.F. (eds.) MICAI 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5317, pp. 720–731. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Benferhat, S., Smaoui, S.: Inferring interventions in product-based possibilistic causal networks. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 169(1), 26–50 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bonnefon, J., Da Silva Neves, R., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Background default knowledge and causality ascriptions. In: ECAI, pp. 11–15 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bonnefon, J.F., Da Silva Neves, R., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Predicting causality ascriptions from background knowledge: model and experimental validation. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 48(3), 752–765 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Boukhris, I., Benferhat, S., Elouedi, Z.: A belief function model for ascribing causality. In: EPIA, pp. 342–356 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boukhris, I., Elouedi, Z., Benferhat, S.: Modeling interventions using belief causal networks. In: FLAIRS, pp. 602–607 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goldszmidt, M., Pearl, J.: Rank-based systems: A simple approach to belief revision, belief update, and reasoning about evidence and actions. In: KR, pp. 661–672 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Halpern, J., Pearl, J.: Causes and explanations: A structurel model approach. In: UAI, pp. 194–202 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morin, B., Mé, L., Debar, H., Ducassé, M.: A logic-based model to support alert correlation in intrusion detection. Information Fusion 10(4), 285–299 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasonning and Inference. Cambridge University Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shafer, G.: The Art of Causal Conjecture. The MIT Press (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smets, P.: The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. IEEE Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12(5), 447–458 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smets, P.: About updating. In: UAI, pp. 378–385 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smets, P.: The transferable belief model for quantified belief representation, vol. 1, pp. 267–301. Kluwer Academic Publisher (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spohn, W.: Ordinal conditional functions: a dynamic theory of epistemic states causation in decision. In: Belief Changes and Statistics, pp. 105–134 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wakker, P.: Dempster belief functions are based on the principle of complete ignorance. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 8(3), 271–284 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Imen Boukhris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boukhris, I., Benferhat, S., Elouedi, Z. (2012). Ascribing Causality from Interventional Belief Function Knowledge. In: Denoeux, T., Masson, MH. (eds) Belief Functions: Theory and Applications. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 164. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29461-7_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29461-7_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29460-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29461-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics