Skip to main content

A Critical Comparison between GMM Classifier and Polynomial Classifier for Text-Independent Speaker Identification

  • Chapter
Book cover Frontiers in Computer Education

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 133))

  • 102 Accesses

Abstract

This paper compares performances between Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) classifier and polynomial classifier for text-independent speaker identification. The MFCC feature set has been used for this comparison. Experimental evaluation was conducted on the POLYCOST database with 130 speakers. The importance of the prior in the polynomial classifier has been discussed in detail. Results reveal that, the identification accuracy of the polynomial classifier strongly depends on the choice of prior. For proper prior selection the polynomial classifier can perform better than the GMM classifier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davis, S.B., Mermelsteine, P.: Comparison of parametric representation for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE Trans. Acoust., Speech, Signal Processing, ASSP-28(4), 357–365 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reynolds, D.A., Rose, R.C.: Robust Text-Independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models. IEEE Trans. Speech and Audio Processing 3(1), 72–83 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell, W.M., Assaleh, K.T., Broun, C.C.: Speaker recognition with polynomial classifiers. IEEE Trans. Speech and Audio Processing 10(4), 205–212 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell, W.M., Torkkola, K., Balakrishnan, S.V.: Dimension reduction techniques for training polynomial networks. In: Proceedings of 17 International Conference of Machine Learning, vol. 200, pp. 1015–1022

    Google Scholar 

  5. Petrovska, D., et al.: POLYCOST: A Telephonic speech database for speaker recognition. In: RLA2C, Avignon, France, April 20-23, pp. 211–214 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nirmalya Sen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sen, N., Basu, T.K. (2012). A Critical Comparison between GMM Classifier and Polynomial Classifier for Text-Independent Speaker Identification. In: Sambath, S., Zhu, E. (eds) Frontiers in Computer Education. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 133. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27552-4_74

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27552-4_74

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27551-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27552-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics