Abstract
Sustainable ICT (SICT) can develop solutions that offer benefits both internally in IT and across the extended enterprise. However, because the field is new and evolving, few guidelines and best practices are available. There is a need to improve the SICT behaviours, practices and processes within organizations to deliver greater value from SICT. To address the issue, a consortium of leading organizations from industry, the nonprofits sector, and academia decided to develop a framework for systematically assessing and improving SICT capabilities. The SICT Capability Maturity Framework (SICT-CMF) gives organizations a vital tool to manage their sustainability capability. The framework provides a comprehensive value-based model for organizing, evaluating, planning, and managing SICT capabilities. Using the framework, organizations can assess the maturity of their SICT capability and systematically improve capabilities in a measurable way to meet the sustainability objectives including reducing environmental impacts and increasing profitability. The core of SICT-CMF is a maturity model for SICT which provides a management system with associated improvement roadmaps that guide senior IT and business management in selecting strategies to continuously improve, develop, and manage the sustainable IT capability. This chapter describes the SICT-CMF and the use of it to determine the maturity of sustainable IT capability within a number of leading organisations. The chapter highlights the challenges in managing SICT and motivates the benefit of maturity models. The development process for the SICT-CMF is discussed and the role of Design Science in the development cycle is explored. The application of the resulting model and its use to measure SICT maturity is discussed together with an analysis of the average results for organisations using the model. The chapter concludes with practical insights gained from the assessments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boudreau, M.-C., Chen, A. J., & Huber, M. (2008). Green IS: Building sustainable business practices. In R. T. Watson (Ed.), Information systems (pp. 247–261). Athens, GA: Global Text Project.
Bratteteig, T. (2007). Design research in informatics. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 65–74.
Brinkkemper, S. (1996). Method engineering: Engineering of information systems development methods and tools. Information and Software Technology, 38(4), 275–280.
Carlsson, S. D. (2010). Design science research in information systems: A critical realist approach. In A. Hevner & S. Chatterjee (Eds.), Design science research in information systems: Theory and practice, Springer.
Curley, M. (2004). Managing information technology for business value. Hillsboro, OR: Intel Press.
Donnellan, B., Sheridan, C., & Curry, E. (2011). A capability maturity framework for sustainable information and communication technology. IT Professional, 13(1), 33–40.
Enkvist, P., Naucler, T., & Rosander, J. (2007, February). A cost curve for greenhouse gas reduction. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1–11.
Gutzwiller, T. A. (1994). Das CC RIM-Referenzmodell für den Entwurf von betrieblichen, transaktionsorientierten Informationssystemen. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica-Verlag.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.
March, S. T., & Smith, G. G. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251–266.
Mettler, T., & Rohner, P. (2009). Situational maturity models as instrumental artefacts for organizational design. Paper presented at the DESRIST’09, Malvern, PA.
Molla, A., Cooper, V., Corbitt, B., Deng, H., Peszynski, K., Pittayachawan, S., & Teoh, S. Y. (2008). E-readiness to G-readiness: Developing a green information technology readiness framework. ACIS 2008 Proceedings. Christchurch, New Zealand
Murugesan, S. (2008). Harnessing Green IT: Principles and practices. IT Professional, 10(1), 24–33.
O’Flynn, A. (2010). Green IT: The global benchmark. Fujitsu: White paper.
Paulk, M. C., Weber, C. V., Curtis, B., & Chrissis, M. B. (1993). Capability maturity model for software (version 1.1) (Tech. Rep. No. CMU/SEI-93-TR-024 ESC-TR-93-177). Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University.
Punter, T., & Lemmen, K. (1996). The META-model: Towards a new approach for method engineering. Information and Software Technology, 38(4), 295–305.
Rosemann, M., & de Bruin, T. (2005, February). Application of a holistic model for determining BPM maturity. BPTrends, 2004, 1–20.
Webb, M. (2008). Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age: The climate group. 21st Feb 2012 Retrieved from http://www.smart2020.org/_assets/files/02_Smart2020Report.pdf 21st Feb 2012
Acknowledgments
We would like to recognise the contribution of the members of the Innovative Value Institute’s Sustainable Information and Communication Technology (SICT) working group. Enterprise Ireland funded part of the work presented in this chapter under Grant CC/2009/0801.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Curry, E., Donnellan, B. (2012). Understanding the Maturity of Sustainable ICT. In: vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., Recker, J. (eds) Green Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27488-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27488-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27487-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27488-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)