Abstract
Technology acceptance of conventional Information and Communication technologies (ICT) devices is extensively researched within the last twenty years. However, comparably small knowledge is prevalent with respect to ubiquitous ICT in the living environment. Furthermore, there is nearly no data about user acceptance’s dependency of integrated technologies on varying domestic spaces and how acceptance varies regarding user diversity. This study explores the acceptance of home-integrated ICT (hands-free equipment, camera, positioning system). In different domestic spaces (living room, bedroom, bathroom) acceptance for integrated technology was assessed, using qualitative as well as quantitative methods. Results show that users’ acceptance differs considerably depending on the room type (acceptance is the highest in the living and the lowest in the bathroom). Moreover, the most disliked technology for home monitoring are camera-based systems, followed by the positioning system and the microphone. Also, there was a significant interacting effect of room type and technology: While none of these technologies is accepted for the bathroom, the living room is less sensitive to their presence with the microphone as the most accepted technology. User diversity does not play a major role hinting at generic acceptance patterns regarding ICT integrated in home environments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Leonhardt, S.: Personal Healthcare Devices. In: Mekherjee, S., et al. (eds.) Malware, Hardware Technology Drivers of AI, pp. 349–370. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)
Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Different Perspectives on Technology Acceptance: The Role of Technology Type and Age. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) USAB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5889, pp. 20–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Rogers, Y.: The Changing Face of Human-Computer Interaction in the Age of Ubiquitous Computing. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) USAB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5889, pp. 1–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Stronge, A.J., Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D.: Human factors considerations in implementing telemedicine systems to accommodate older adults. Telemedicine & Telecare 13, 1–3 (2007)
Reding, V.: Foreword. In: Roe, P.R.W. (ed.) Towards an Inclusive Future Impact and Wider Potential of Information and Communication Technologies. COST, Brussels, Belgium, pp. i–ii (2007)
Heinze, R.G.: Tele-Monitoring@Home. Optionen und Realitäten eines, dritten“ Gesundheitsstandortes. In: Proceedings of the Second German Congress on Ambient Assisted Living. VDE Verlag GmbH, Berlin (2009)
Schmitt, J.M.: Innovative medical technologies help ensure improved patient care and cost-effectiveness. International Journal of Medical Marketing 2(2), 17–178 (2002)
Curry, R., Trejo-Tinoco, M., Wardle, D.: The use of information and communication technology to support independent living for older and disabled people. Department of Health, London (2003)
Junestrand, S., Tollmar, K.: Video Mediated Communication for Domestic Environments: Architectural and Technological Design. In: Streitz, N.A., et al. (eds.) CoBuild 1999. LNCS, vol. 1670, pp. 177–190. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Lalou, S.: Identity, Social Status, Privacy and Face-keeping in the Digital Society. Journal of Social Science Information 47(3), 299–330 (2008)
Necheles, T.: Standards of Medical Care: How Does an Innovative Medical Procedure Become Accepted. Medicine & Health Care 10(1), 15–18 (1982)
Ziefle, M., Wilkowska, W.: Technology acceptability for medical assistance. Full paper at the 4th ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare 2010, pp. 1–9 (2010), doi 10.4108/ICST.PERVASIVEHEALTH2010.8859.
Zimmer, Z., Chappell, N.: Receptivity to New Technology among Older Adults. Disability and Rehabilitation 21(5/6), 2–230 (1999)
Jaehn, J., Nagel, K.: e-Health. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Aarts, E., Harwig, R., Schuurmans, M.: Ambient Intelligence. In: Denning, P. (Hrsg.) The Invisible Future. The Seamless Integration of Technology into Everyday Life. McGraw-Hill Professional, Lansing (2001)
Holzinger, A., Schaupp, K., Eder-Halbedl, W.: An Investigation on Acceptance of Ubiquitous Devices for the Elderly in a Geriatric Hospital Environment: Using the Example of Person Tracking. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 22–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Eloy, S., Plácido, I., Duarte, J.P.: Housing and information society: integration of ICT in the existing housing stock. In: Braganca, et al. (eds.) SB 2007, Suistainable Construction, Materials, Practices, Portugal. IOS Press (2007)
Eloy, S., Plácido, I., Duarte, J.: Integration of Information, Communication and Automation technologies in Housing Rehabilitation. XXXVII IAHS. In: World Congress on Housing, Santander, Spain, October 26-29 (2010)
Lee, M.: Embedded Assessment of Wellness with Smart Home Sensors. In: UbiComp 2010, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 26-29 (2010)
Nikolaus, T.: Gait, Balance and Falls - Reasons and Consequences. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 130(15), 958–960 (2005)
de Ruyter, B., Pelgrim, E.: Ambient Assisted-Living Research in CareLab. ACM Interactions 14(4), 3–33 (2007)
Lüder, M., Salomon, R., Bieber, G.: StairMaster: A New Online Fall Detection Device. In: 2ndCongress for Ambient Assisted Living, Berlin (2009)
Mann, S.: Smart Clothing: The Wearable Computer and WearCam. Personal Technologies 1(1) (1997)
Haines, W.D., Vernon, J.R., Dannenberg, R.B., Driessen, P.F.: Placement of Sound Sources in the Stereo Field Using Measured Room Impulse Responses. In: Kronland-Martinet, R., Ystad, S., Jensen, K. (eds.) CMMR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4969, pp. 276–287. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Khan, S.M., Shah, M.: A Multiview Approach to Tracking People in Crowded Scenes using a Planar Homography Constraint. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 3954, pp. 133–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Kourogi, M., Kurata, T.: Personal Positioning based on Walking Locomotion analysis with Self-Contained Sensors and a wearable camera. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (2003)
Klack, L., et al.: Future Care Floor: A Sensitive Floor for Movement Monitoring and Fall Detection in Home Environments. In: Lin, J.C., Nikita, K.S. (eds.) Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare (pp, pp. 211–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Leusmann, P., Möllering, C., Klack, L., Kasugai, K., Ziefle, M., Rumpe, B.: Your Floor Knows Where You Are: Sensing and Acquisition of Movement Data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Managing Health Information in Mobile Applications (HIMoA 2011), IEEE 12th International Conference on Mobile Data Management (2011)
Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences 39, 273–315 (2008)
Arning, K., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: “Same Same but Different” How Service Contexts of Mobile Technologies Shape Usage Motives and Barriers. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 34–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: Smart Home Technologies: Insights into Generation-Specific Acceptance Motives. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) USAB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5889, pp. 312–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Wilkowska, W., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: A Small but Significant Difference – The Role of Gender on Acceptance of Medical Assistive Technologies. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) USAB 2010. LNCS, vol. 6389, pp. 82–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: User diversity as a challenge for the integration of medical technology into future home environments. In: Ziefle, M., Röcker, C. (eds.) Human-Centred Design of eHealth Technologies. Concepts, Methods and Applications, pp. 95–126. IGI Global, Hershey (2011)
Bell, G., Dourish, P.: Back to the shed. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11(5), 373–381 (2006)
Stewart, J.: The social consumption of ICTs: insights from research on the appropriation and consumption of new ICTs in the domestic environment. RCSS, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (2002)
Leonardi, C., Mennecozzi, C., et al.: Knocking on elders’ door: investigating the functional and emotional geography of their domestic space. In: Proceedings of OZCHI 2009, pp. 1703–1712. ACM (2009)
Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Hemmings, T., Benford, S.: Finding a Place for Ubicomp in the Home. In: Dey, A.K., Schmidt, A., McCarthy, J.F. (eds.) UbiComp 2003. LNCS, vol. 2864, pp. 208–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Dethloff, C.: Akzeptanz und Nicht-Akzeptanz von technischen Produktinnovationen (Acceptance and not-Acceptance of technical product innovations). Pabst Science Publishers (Beiträge zur Wirtschaftspsychologie; 6), Lengerich (2004)
Wilhem, H.-J.: Das Alter - ein neuer Lebensabschnitt entsteht. Pr-Internet, HPS-Medienverlag (November 2000)
Marquis-Faulkes, F., McKenna, S.J., Newell, A.F., Gregor, P.: Gathering the requirements for a fall monitor using drama and video with older people. Technology and Disability 17, 227–236 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ziefle, M., Himmel, S., Wilkowska, W. (2011). When Your Living Space Knows What You Do: Acceptance of Medical Home Monitoring by Different Technologies. In: Holzinger, A., Simonic, KM. (eds) Information Quality in e-Health. USAB 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7058. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25364-5_43
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25364-5_43
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25363-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25364-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)