Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations pp 113–135Cite as

The First Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC 2010)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 383))

Abstract

Motivated by the challenges of bilateral negotiations between people and automated agents we organized the first automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC 2010). The purpose of the competition is to facilitate the research in the area bilateral multi-issue closed negotiation. The competition was based on the Genius environment, which is a General Environment for Negotiation with Intelligent multi-purpose Usage Simulation. The first competition was held in conjunction with the Ninth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-10) and was comprised of seven teams. This paper presents an overview of the competition, as well as general and contrasting approaches towards negotiation strategies that were adopted by the participants of the competition. Based on analysis in post–tournament experiments, the paper also attempts to provide some insights with regard to effective approaches towards the design of negotiation strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. An, B., Lesser, V.: Yushu: a heuristic-based agent for automated negotiating competition. In: Ito, T., et al. (eds.) New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 383, pp. 145–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann, R.J., Hart, S. (eds.): Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, March 1992. Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, vol. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Max, H.: Bazerman and Margaret A. Neale. Negotiator rationality and negotiator cognition: The interactive roles of prescriptive and descriptive research. In: Young, H.P. (ed.) Negotiation Analysis, pp. 109–130. The University of Michigan Press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coehoorn, R.M., Jennings, N.R.: Learning an opponent’s preferences to make effective multi-issue negotiation tradeoffs (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gerding, E.H., Williams, C.R., Robu, V., Jennings, N.R.: Iamhaggler: A negotiation agent for complex environments. In: Ito, T., et al. (eds.) New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 383, pp. 151–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diniz da Costa, A., de Lucena, C.J.P., Torres da Silva, V., Azevedo, S.C., Soares, F.A.: Art Competition: Agent Designs to Handle Negotiation Challenges. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S.K., Sabater-Mir, J., Singh, M.P. (eds.) Trust 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5396, pp. 244–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Erev, I., Roth, A.: Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibrium. American Economic Review 88(4), 848–881 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Int. Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24(3-4), 159–182 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Using similarity criteria to make negotiation trade-offs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 142(2), 205–237 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaheen, S.: Fatima, Michael Wooldridge, and Nicholas R. Jennings. Multi-issue negotiation under time constraints. In: AAMAS 2002: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 143–150. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fullam, K.K., Klos, T.B., Muller, G., Sabater, J., Schlosser, A., Barber, K.S., Rosenschein, J.S., Vercouter, L., Voss, M.: A specification of the agent reputation and trust (art) testbed: experimentation and competition for trust in agent societies. In: The 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 512–518. ACM Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Greenwald, A., Stone, P.: Autonomous bidding agents in the trading agent competition. IEEE Internet Computing 5(2), 52–60 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hindriks, K., Tykhonov, D.: Towards a quality assessment method for learning preference profiles in negotiation (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ito, T., Hattori, H., Klein, M.: Multi-issue negotiation protocol for agents: Exploring nonlinear utility spaces (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jonker, C.M., Robu, V., Treur, J.: An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 15(2), 221–252 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H. (eds.): Decisions with Mutliple Objectives. Cambridge University Press (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kersten, G.E., Noronha, S.J.: Rational agents, contract curves, and inefficient compromises report. In: Working papers, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kersten, G.E., Zhang, G.: Mining inspire data for the determinants of successful internet negotiations. InterNeg Research Papers INR 04/01 Central European Journal of Operational Research (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kraus, S.: Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments. MIT Press (October 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., Zlotkin, G.: Multiagent negotiation under time constraints. Artificial Intelligence 75(2), 297–345 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lax, D.A., Sebenius, J.K.: Thinking coalitionally: party arithmetic, process opportunism, and strategic sequencing. In: Young, H.P. (ed.) Negotiation Analysis, pp. 153–193. The University of Michigan Press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Tykhonov, D., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.M.: Supporting the design of general automated negotiators. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations, ACAN 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Wilkenfeld, J., Barry, J.: Negotiating with bounded rational agents in environments with incomplete information using an automated agent. Artificial Intelligence 172(6-7), 823–851 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin, R., Oshrat, Y., Kraus, S.: Investigating the benefits of automated negotiations in enhancing people’s negotiation skills. In: AAMAS 2009: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 345–352 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Litan, C.M., Serban, L.D., Silaghi, G.C.: Agentfsega - time constrained reasoning model for bilateral multi-issue negotiations. In: Ito, T., et al. (eds.) New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 383, pp. 159–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. McKelvey, R.D., Palfrey, T.R.: An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica 60(4), 803–836 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Niu, J., Cai, K., Parsons, S., McBurney, P., Gerding, E.: What the 2007 tac market design game tells us about effective auction mechanisms. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rubinstein, A., Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: Bargaining and Markets Economic Theory, Econometrics, and Mathematical Economics. Academic Press (April 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A. (eds.): A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Raiffa, H.: The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., Metcalfe, D.: Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Harvard University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rubinstein, A.: Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1), 97–109 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Fujita, K., Kawaguchi, S., Ito, T.: Compromising strategy based on estimated maximum utility for automated negotiating agents. In: Ito, T., et al. (eds.) New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 383, pp. 137–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stone, P., Greenwald, A.: The first international trading agent competition: Autonomous bidding agents. Electronic Commerce Research 5(2), 229–265 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. van Galen Last, N.: Opponent model estimation in bilateral multi-issue negotiation. In: Ito, T., et al. (eds.) New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 383, pp. 167–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wellman, M.P., Wurman, P.R., O’Malley, K., Bangera, R., de Lin, S., Reeves, D., Walsh, W.E.: Designing the market game for a trading agent competition. IEEE Internet Computing 5(2), 43–51 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zeng, D., Sycara, K.: Benefits of learning in negotiation (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zeng, D., Sycara, K.: Bayesian learning in negotiation. International Journal of Human Computer Systems 48, 125–141 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Man Machine Interaction Group, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Tim Baarslag, Koen Hindriks & Catholijn Jonker

  2. Computer Science Department, Bar-Ilan University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Sarit Kraus & Raz Lin

  3. Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA

    Sarit Kraus

Authors
  1. Tim Baarslag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Koen Hindriks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Catholijn Jonker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sarit Kraus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Raz Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Baarslag .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Nagoya, Showa, 466-8555, Japan

    Takayuki Ito

  2. School of Information Technology &, Computer Science, University of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, 2522, New South Wales, Australia

    Minjie Zhang

  3. , School of Electronics and Computer Scien, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom

    Valentin Robu

  4. Dept. Computer Studies, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leics., LE11 3TU, United Kingdom

    Shaheen Fatima

  5. School of Engineering, Dept. of Mechanical Systems Engineering, Yamagata University, Jonan 4-3-16, Yonezawa, 992-8510, Japan

    Tokuro Matsuo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C., Kraus, S., Lin, R. (2012). The First Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC 2010). In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T. (eds) New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 383. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24696-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24696-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24695-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24696-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation