Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6999))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Usually object types are organized in taxonomies by means of a specialization relation (also called subtyping or isa) ‘implemented’ by means of inheritance. This paper proposes a (non-incompatible) alternative to taxonomies that relies on three primitives: grounding, a specific kind of factual existential dependence, extensional atemporal parthood, and existence at a time. On the basis of these relations, specific, generic, and compositional grounding relations between object types are introduced. By clearly separating the objects from the substrata on which they are grounded, these grounding relations allow to stratify object types in levels and to manage inheritance in a flexible way. In particular, this approach helps to avoid isa overloading and to overcome some classical difficulties related to inheritance, e.g. attribute overriding, attribute hiding, or dynamic and multiple classification and specialization, that are relevant aspects especially in modeling roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Jadir, L., Michel, L.: If we refuse the inheritance... In: Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Soda, G., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) DEXA 1999. LNCS, vol. 1677, pp. 569–572. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong, D.M.: A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, L.R.: The Metaphysics of Everyday Life. Cambridge Univerity Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Borgo, S., Vieu, L.: Artefacts in formal ontology. In: Meijers, A. (ed.) Handbook of Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, pp. 273–308. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Correia, F.: Existential Dependence and Cognate Notions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Geneva (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fine, K.: Acts, events and things. In: Sixth International Wittgenstein Symposium, Kirchberg-Wechsel, Austria, pp. 97–105 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guizzardi, G., Halpin, T.: Ontological foundations for conceptual modeling. Applied Ontology 3(1-2), 1–12 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, A.: The Logic of Common Nouns. Phd thesis, Yale University (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, J.: Mind in a Physical World. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Masolo, C.: Understanding ontological levels. In: Lin, F., Sattler, U. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2010), pp. 258–268. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masolo, C., Vieu, L., Bottazzi, E., Catenacci, C., Ferrario, R., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N.: Social roles and their descriptions. In: Dubois, D., Welty, C., Williams, M.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2004), pp. 267–277 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mizoguchi, R., Sunagawa, E., Kozaki, K., Kitamura, Y.: A model of roles within an ontology development tool: Hozo. Applied Ontology 2(2), 159–179 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rea, M. (ed.): Material Constitution. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sider, T.: Four-Dimensionalism. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Simons, P.: Parts: a Study in Ontology. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steimann, F.: On the representation of roles in object-oriented and conceptual modelling. Data and Knowledge Engineering 35, 83–106 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Vieu, L., Borgo, S., Masolo, C.: Artefacts and roles: Modelling strategies in a multiplicative ontology. In: Eschenbach, C., Gruninger, M. (eds.) Proceedings of Fith International Conference on Formal Ontology and Information Systems (FOIS 2008), pp. 121–134. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Masolo, C. (2011). Levels for Conceptual Modeling. In: De Troyer, O., Bauzer Medeiros, C., Billen, R., Hallot, P., Simitsis, A., Van Mingroot, H. (eds) Advances in Conceptual Modeling. Recent Developments and New Directions. ER 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6999. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24574-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24574-9_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24573-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24574-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics