Skip to main content

Did You Notice? Artificial Team-Mates Take Risks for Players

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6895))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Artificial agents are increasingly included in digital games, often taking on a role as a team-mate with human players. An interesting area of focus is the differences in player responses to team-mates that are either controlled by another human or a computer. Although there has been research examining social dynamics of team-mates and even some recent research comparing the responses to computer and human team-mates examining blame, credit, enjoyment, and differences in physiological responses of arousal, there does not seem to have been any research looking specifically at the differences in responses to acts of risk-taking on behalf of a team-mate. In order to study this question, a quantitative study was conducted in which 40 participants played a real-time, goal-oriented, cooperative game. The game allows (but does not require) players to perform risky actions that benefit their team-mates – specifically, player’s can “draw gunfire” towards themselves (and away from their team-mates). During the study, all participants played the game twice: once with an AI team-mate and once with a “presumed” human team-mate (i.e., an AI team-mate that they believed was a human team-mate). Thus, the team-mate performance and behaviors were identical for both cases – and in both cases, the team-mate “drew gunfire” an equal amount of the time. The main finding reported here is that players are more likely to notice acts of risk-taking by a human team-mate than by an artificial team-mate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Van Diggelen, J., Muller, T., Van Den Bosch, K.: Using artificial team members for team training in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, IVA 2010, pp. 28–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doherty, S.M.: Human-centered design in synthetic teammates for aviation: The challenge for artificial intelligence. In: Russell, I., Haller, S.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, St. Augustine, Florida, USA, May 12-14, pp. 54–56. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Babu, S., Grechkin, T., Chihak, B., Ziemer, C., Kearney, J., Cremer, J., Plumert, J.: A virtual peer for investigating social influences on children’s bicycling. In: Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2009, pp. 91–98 (March 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sherry, J.L., Lucas, K., Greenberg, B.S., Lachlan, K.: Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preferences. In: Vorderer, P., Bryant, J. (eds.) Playing Video Games Motives Responses and Consequences, pp. 213–224. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bostan, B.: Player motivations: A psychological perspective. Comput. Entertain. 7 (June 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mandryk, R.L., Inkpen, K.M., Calvert, T.W.: Using psychophysiological techniques to measure user experience with entertainment technologies. Behaviour & Information Technology 25(2), 141–158 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gallagher, H.L., Jack, A.I., Roepstorff, A., Frith, C.D.: Imaging the intentional stance in a competitive game. NeuroImage 16(3), 814–821 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanfey, A.G., Rilling, J.K., Aronson, J.A., Nystrom, L.E., Cohen, J.D.: The neural basis of economic Decision-Making in the ultimatum game. Science 300(5626), 1755–1758 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Montague, P.R., Chiu, P.H.: For goodness’ sake. Nature Neuroscience 10(2), 137–138 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lim, S., Reeves, B.: Computer agents versus avatars: Responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(1-2), 57–68 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Merritt, T.R., Tan, K.B., Ong, C., Thomas, A., Chuah, T.L., McGee, K.: Are artificial team-mates scapegoats in computer games. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW 2011, pp. 685–688. ACM Press, New York (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Merritt, T.R., McGee, K., Chuah, T.L., Ong, C.: Choosing human team-mates: perceived identity as a moderator of player preference and enjoyment. In: The Proceedings of the 2011 Foundations of Digital Games Conference, pp. 196–203 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Merritt, T., Ong, C., Chuah, T.L., McGee, K. (2011). Did You Notice? Artificial Team-Mates Take Risks for Players. In: Vilhjálmsson, H.H., Kopp, S., Marsella, S., Thórisson, K.R. (eds) Intelligent Virtual Agents. IVA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6895. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23973-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23974-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics