Skip to main content

Respect for Persons in Research and in Genetics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Challenges in Genomics Research
  • 859 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines a central concept in ethics, that of respect for persons. This notion is widely used but understood in loose, varying, and sometimes inconsistent ways. Common ways of understanding the notion of respect for persons are explored and philosophical discussion of respect for persons is introduced, including the account given by Immanuel Kant. The scope of any imperative to show respect for persons is examined, together with its relation to personal information. The debate about the feedback of findings in genomics research is used as an illustration of how the notion of respect for persons has been used to produce practical ethical conclusions. However, a close examination of the literature shows how varying notions of respect are elided and how unwarranted conclusions may be drawn. Conclusions drawn include the need for careful elaboration of the notion of respect for persons, and the need to examine the evidential and argumentative support for a position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bovenberg J, Meulenkamp T, Gevers S (2009) Your biobank, your doctor? The right to full disclosure of population biobank findings. Genomics Soc Policy 5(1):55–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton EW (2008) Incidental findings in genetics research using archived data. J Law Med Ethics 36(2):286–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon RS (2010) Respect. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie RS, Telfer E (1969) Respect for persons. George Allen and Unwin Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004) 25 Recommendations on the ethical, legal and social implications of genetic testing. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez CV, Kodish E, Weijer C (2003) Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. IRB Ethics Hum Res 25(3):12–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frueh FW, Greely HT, Green RC, Hogarth S, Siegel S (2011) The future of direct-to-consumer clinical genetic tests. Nat Rev Genet 12(7):511–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heard E, Tishkoff S, Todd JA, Vidal M, Wagner GP, Wang J, Weigel D, Young R (2010) Ten years of genetics and genomics: what have we achieved and where are we heading? Nat Rev Genet 11(10):723–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Human Genetics Commission (2002) Inside information: balancing interests in the use of personal genetic data. Human Genetics Commission, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1948) Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. Hutchinson University Library, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoppers BM, Joly Y, Simard J, Durocher F (2006) The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives. Eur J Hum Genet 14(11):1170–1178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur D (2009) It’s my genome: should researchers be obliged to return genetic data to research participants? Robinson Bradshaw and Hinson. http://www.genomicslawreport.com/. Accessed July 2011

  • McGuire AL, Caulfield T, Cho MK (2008) Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet 9(2):152–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge A, Winer E (2002) Informing clinical trial participants about study results. J Am Med Assoc 288:363–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravitsky V, Wilfond BS (2006) Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. Am J Bioeth 6(6):8–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shalowitz DI, Miller FG (2005) Disclosing individual results of clinical research: implications of respect for participants. J Am Med Assoc 294(6):737–740. doi:10.1001/jama.294.6.737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sontag S (1983) Illness as metaphor. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ness B (2008) Genomic research and incidental findings. J Law Med Ethics 36(2):292–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Boddington .

Appendix: Participants at a Workshop on Respect for Persons, St. Hugh’s College Oxford, 2010

Appendix: Participants at a Workshop on Respect for Persons, St. Hugh’s College Oxford, 2010

Mhairi Aitken, University of Edinburgh

Louise Bezuidenhout, University of Exeter

Arndt Bialobrzeski, University of Marburg

Roger Bjugn

Meghan Bruce, University of Oxford

Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health

Paul Burton, University of Leicester

Yu-mei Chang, University of Oxford

Alan Doyle, NIGB Director

Stephanie Dyke, Sanger Institute

Khaled El Emam, University of Ottawa

Claudia Emerson

Grethe Foss, Norwegian Biotech Advisory Board

Donna Gitter, City University of New York

Bryce Goodman, University of Oxford

Edward Gosden, University of Oxford

Jane Green, University of Oxford

Alison Hall, PHG Foundation

Shawn Harmon, University of Edinburgh

Naomi Hawkins, University of Exeter

Nils Hoppe, Leibniz Universität Hannover

Tim Hubbard, Sanger Institute

Jane Juniper, AstraZeneca

Dorcas Kamuya, Wellcome Kilifi, Kenya

Barbara Koenig, Mayo Clinic

Ayumi Koso, the Database Centre for Life Science

Jacob Leveridge, Wellcome Trust

Matteo Macilotti, University of Trento

Aisha Malik, University of Oxford

Kenji Matsui

Karen Melham, Oxford Bioethics Network

Mari T. Minowa, the Database Center for Life Science

Madeleine Murtagh, University of Leicester

Kieran O’Doherty, University of British Columbia

Saminda Pathmasiri, Public Population Project in Genomics

Cedric Pruski

Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Genetics and Society Platform

Mark Robertson, AstraZeneca

Behnaz Schofield, Universal of Bristol

Nayha Sethi, University of Edinburgh and SHIP Project

Liliana Siede, Adviser National Congress of Argentina

Carol Smee, Sanger Institute

Liliana Soto Gomez, University of Leeds

Anne- Marie Tasse, Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill Universit

Paulina Tindana, University of Oxford

Prodromos Tsiavos, LSE

Louise Vale, Consultant

Christine Wasunna, Kenya Medical Research Institute

Edgar Whitley, LSE

Don Willison, OAHPP

Stefan Winter, Hannover Medical School

Jessica Wright, Leicester University

Vicki Xafis, Public Health, University of Adelaide

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boddington, P. (2012). Respect for Persons in Research and in Genetics. In: Ethical Challenges in Genomics Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23699-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics