Skip to main content

Semantic Similarity Measures for the Development of Thai Dialog System

  • Conference paper
Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications (KES-AMSTA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6682))

Abstract

Semantic similarity plays an important role in a number of applications including information extraction, information retrieval, document clustering and ontology learning. Most work has concentrated on English and other European languages. However, for the Thai language, there has been no research about word semantic similarity. This paper presents an experiment and benchmark data sets investigating the application of a WordNet-based machine measure to Thai similarity. Because there is no functioning Thai WordNet we also investigate the use of English WordNet with machine translation of Thai words.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lemon, O., Liu, X.: DUDE: a dialogue and understanding development environment, mapping business process models to information state update dialogue systems. In: Lemon, O., Liu, X. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 2006, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kopp, S., Gesellensetter, L., Krämer, N.C., Wachsmuth, I.: A Conversational Agent as Museum Guide – Design and Evaluation of a Real-World Application. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3661, pp. 329–343. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Ibarhim, A., Johasson, P.: Multimodal Dialogue Systems for Interactive TVApplications. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI 2002, Washington DC (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, F., et al.: Language understanding component for Chinese dialogue system. In: International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Beijing, October 16-20, pp. 1053–1056 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ehsani, F., Bernstein, J., Najmi, A.: An interactive dialog system for learning Japanese. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. O’Shea, J., Bandar, Z., Crockett, K., Mclean, D.: A Comparative Study of Two Short Text Semantic Similarity Measures. In: Nguyen, N.T., Jo, G.-S., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES-AMSTA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4953, pp. 82–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miller, G.A.: WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Comm. Acm 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sornlertlamvanich, V., et al.: Review on Development of Asian WordNet. Japlo 2009 year book, 276–285 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, M.P. (ed.): Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 16th edn. SIL International, Dallas (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rubenstein, H., Goodenough, J.B.: Contextual Correlates of Synonymy. Communication of the ACM 8(10), 627–633 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, G.A., Charles, W.G.: Contextual Correlates of Semantic Similarity. Language and Cognitive Processes 6(1), 1–28 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Jarmasz, M., Szpakowicz, S.: Roget’s Thesaurus and semantic similarity. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, Borovetz, Bulgaria, pp. 212–219 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morris, J., Hirst, J.: Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational Linguistics 17(1), 21–48 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kozima, H., Furugori, T.: Similarity between word computed by spreading activation on an English dictionary. In: Proceedings of 6th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Utrecht, pp. 232–239 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rada, R., Mili, H., Bicknell, E., Blettner, M.: Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 19(1), 17–30 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu, Z., Palmer, M.: Verb semantic and lexical selection. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Las Cruces, NM, pp. 133–138 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 14th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, Montreal, Canada, pp. 448–453 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: Proceeding of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 296–304 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W., Laham, D.: Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes 25, 259–284 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tversky, A.: Features of Similarity. Psychological Review 84(4), 327–352 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodriguez, M., Egenhofer, M.: Determining Semantic Similarity Among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies. IEEE Trans. On Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(2), 442–456 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li, Y., Bandar, Z., McLean, D.: An Approach for Measuring Semantic Similarity between Words Using Multiple Information Sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(4), 871–882 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pedersen, T., et al.: Measures of semantic similarity and relatedness in the Biomedical domain. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 40, 288–299 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pirro, G.: A semantic similarity metric combining features and intrinsic information content. Data & Knowledge Engineering 68, 1289–1308 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hliaoutakis, A., Varelas, G., Voutsakis, E., Petrakis, E.G.M., Milios, E.: Information retrieval by semantic similarity. Int’l Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems 2(3), 55–73 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Google translate, http://translate.google.com (cited 08/10/2010)

  27. Och, F.J.: Statistical Machine Translation: Foundations and Recent Advances. Tutorial at MT Summit 2005, Phuket, Thailand (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Trakultaweekoon, K., Porkaew, P., Supnithi, T.: LEXiTRON Vocabulary Suggestion System with Recommendation and Vote Mechanism. In: Proceedings of Conference of SNLP 2007, Thailand (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Longman: Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English, 5 edn. Longman, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li, Y., et al.: Sentence Similarity Based on Semantic Nets and Corpus Statistics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 18(8), 1138–1150 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Osathanunkul, K., O’Shea, J., Bandar, Z., Crockett, K. (2011). Semantic Similarity Measures for the Development of Thai Dialog System. In: O’Shea, J., Nguyen, N.T., Crockett, K., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems: Technologies and Applications. KES-AMSTA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6682. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22000-5_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22000-5_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21999-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22000-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics