Skip to main content

A Complexity Question in Justification Logic

  • Conference paper
  • 534 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6642))

Abstract

Bounds for the computational complexity of major justification logics were found in papers by Buss, N. Krupski, Kuznets, and Milnikel: logics J, J4, JT, LP and JD, were established to be \(\Sigma_2^p\)-complete. A corresponding lower bound is also known for JD4, the system that includes the consistency axiom and positive introspection. However, no upper bound has been established so far for this logic. Here, the missing upper bound for the complexity of JD4 is established through an alternating algorithm. It is shown that using Fitting models of only two worlds is adequate to describe JD4; this helps to produce an effective tableau procedure and essentially is what distinguishes the new algorithm from existing ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Artemov, S.: Operational modal logic. Technical Report MSI 95–29, Cornell University (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Artemov, S.: Explicit provability and constructive semantics. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7(1), 1–36 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Artemov, S.: Kolmogorov and Gödel’s approach to intuitionistic logic: current developments. Russian Mathematical Surveys 59(2), 203–229 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Artemov, S.: The logic of justification. The Review of Symbolic Logic 1(4), 477–513 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Brezhnev, V.N.: On explicit counterparts of modal logics. Technical Report CFIS 2000–05, Cornell University (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buss, S.R., Kuznets, R.: Lower complexity bounds in justification logic (2009) (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buss, S.R., Kuznets, R.: The NP-completeness of reflected fragments of justification logics. In: Artëmov, S., Nerode, A. (eds.) LFCS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5407, pp. 122–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fitting, M.: A semantics for the Logic of Proofs. Technical Report TR–2003012, CUNY Ph.D. Program in Computer Science (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fitting, M.: The logic of proofs, semantically. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 132(1), 1–25 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Krupski, N.V.: On the complexity of the reflected logic of proofs. Theoretical Computer Science 357(1-3), 136–142 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Krupski, V.N.: Referential logic of proofs. Theoretical Computer Science 357(1-3), 143–166 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuznets, R.: On the complexity of explicit modal logics. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the EACSL on Computer Science Logic, pp. 371–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuznets, R.: Complexity Issues in Justification Logic. PhD thesis, CUNY Graduate Center (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuznets, R.: Self-referentiality of justified knowledge. In: Hirsch, E.A., Razborov, A.A., Semenov, A., Slissenko, A. (eds.) CSR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5010, pp. 228–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuznets, R.: Complexity through tableaux in justification logic. In: 2008 European Summer Meeting of the ASL, Logic Colloquium (2008); Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 15(1), 121 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Milnikel, R.S.: Derivability in certain subsystems of the logic of proofs is \(\Pi^p_2\)-complete. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 145(3), 223–239 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Mkrtychev, A.: Models for the logic of proofs. In: Adian, S., Nerode, A. (eds.) LFCS 1997. LNCS, vol. 1234, pp. 266–275. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Pacuit, E.: A note on some explicit modal logics. In: Proceedings of the 5th Panhellenic Logic Symposium (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Achilleos, A. (2011). A Complexity Question in Justification Logic. In: Beklemishev, L.D., de Queiroz, R. (eds) Logic, Language, Information and Computation. WoLLIC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6642. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20920-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20920-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20919-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20920-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics