Skip to main content

Investigating Teachers’ Understanding of IMS Learning Design: Yes They Can!

  • Conference paper
Book cover Sustaining TEL: From Innovation to Learning and Practice (EC-TEL 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6383))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In order to understand whether conceptual obscurity is truly the reason for the slow uptake of IMS Learning Design (LD), we have initiated an investigation into teachers’ understanding of IMS LD outside of technological environments. Using paper representations (“snippets”) of IMS LD component and method elements at levels A and B, 21 higher education teachers from nine countries recreated a prescribed textual learning design. Results showed that the teachers achieved an average conformity of 78% with a prototypical expert solution after watching a 45-minute IMS LD introduction. Despite successfully using IMS LD’s elements, teachers reported having difficulties understanding the concepts environment, property, role-part, and condition. We conclude that the specification per se does not present an insuperable obstacle for teachers, and that from a usability perspective the calls for a new or modified LD specification might be premature, since most obstacles can be overcome with appropriate abstractions in LD tools.

This research was supported by the ICOPER Best Practice Network, which is co-funded by the EC under the eContentplus programme, ECP 2007 EDU 417007.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ICOPER: ICOPER Best Practice Network (2010), http://icoper.org

  2. IMS Global: IMS Learning Design specification (2003), http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign

  3. Griffiths, D., Liber, O.: Opportunities achievements and prospects for use of IMS LD. In: Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Harper, B. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies, pp. 87–112. IGI Global, Hershey (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. van Es, R., Koper, R.: Testing the pedagogical expressiveness of IMS LD. Educational Technology & Society 9(1), 229–249 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Durand, G., Downes, S.: Toward Simple Learning Design 2.0. In: 4th Int. Conf. on Computer Science & Education 2009, Nanning, China, pp. 894–897 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Griffiths, D., Beauvoir, P., Liber, O., Barrett-Baxendale, M.: From reload to ReCourse: learning from IMS learning design implementations. Distance Education 30(2), 201–222 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. IMS Global: IMS Learning Design information model (2003), http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/imsld_infov1p0.html

  8. Griffiths, D., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P.: Advances in editors for IMS LD in the TENCompetence project. In: 8th IEEE Int. Conf. on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 1045–1047 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Neumann, S., Oberhuemer, P.: User evaluation of a graphical modeling tool for IMS Learning Design. In: Spaniol, M., Li, Q., Klamma, R., Lau, R.W.H. (eds.) Advances in Web Based Learning – ICWL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5686, pp. 287–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Paquette, G., Leonard, M., Lundgren-Cayrol, K., Mihaila, S., Gareau, D.: Learning design based on graphical knowledge modelling. Educational Technology & Society 9(1), 97–112 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koper, R., Olivier, B.: Representing the learning design of units of learning. Educational Technology & Society 7(3), 97–111 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hernandez-Leo, D., Asensio-Perez, J., Dimitriadis, Y.: IMS Learning Design support for the formalization of collaborative learning patterns. In: 4th IEEE Int. Conf. on Advanced Learning Technologies, Juensuu, Finland, pp. 350–354 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Duval, E., Verbert, K.: On the role of technical standards for learning technologies. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 1(4), 229–234 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Derntl, M., Neumann, S., Griffiths, D., Oberhuemer, P. (2010). Investigating Teachers’ Understanding of IMS Learning Design: Yes They Can!. In: Wolpers, M., Kirschner, P.A., Scheffel, M., Lindstaedt, S., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Sustaining TEL: From Innovation to Learning and Practice. EC-TEL 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6383. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16020-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16019-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16020-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics