Skip to main content

Can DP Be a Scope Island?

  • Conference paper
Interfaces: Explorations in Logic, Language and Computation (ESSLLI 2008, ESSLLI 2009)

Introduction

Sauerland [1] uses data from inverse linking—cf. [2]—to motivate quantifier raising (QR) out of DP, proposing to derive Larson’s generalization—cf. [3]– regarding the scopal integrity of DP via an Economy-based constraint on QR (cf. [4]).

This squib is in four parts. I first lay out Sauerland’s three arguments for QR out of DP. I present (a slightly modified version of) his mechanism for constraining QR. I show that it both over- and under- generates. I conclude by arguing that the readings Sauerland uses to motivate his account don’t result from an islandrespecting QR mechanism. In short, each of the cases Sauerland considers involve DPs with ”special” scopal properties: plural demonstrative DPs, bare plural DPs, and antecedent-contained deletion (ACD)-hosting DPs. The argument that apparent wide-scope readings of plural demonstratives are only apparent is motivated using (so far as I know) new data from English, while the latter two cases receive independent motivation from the literature. The conclusion is that the question posed in the title of this paper can be answered in the affirmative.

Thanks to Chris Barker, Emma Cunningham, Polly Jacobson, Ezra Keshet, Philippe Schlenker, Uli Sauerland, Anna Szabolcsi, and an anonymous reviewer. This work was supported in part by NSF grant BCS-0902671 to Philippe Schlenker and an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to the author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sauerland, U.: DP Is Not a Scope Island. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2), 303–314 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. May, R.: The Grammar of Quantification. Ph.d. thesis. MIT Press, Cambridge (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Larson, R.K.: Quantifying into NP. Ms. MIT, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruening, B.: QR Obeys Superiority: Frozen Scope and ACD. Linguistic Inquiry 32(2), 233–273 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heim, I.: Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs. Journal of Semantics 9, 183–221 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. May, R.: Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, C.T.J.: Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Garland, New York (1998) (Ph.d. thesis, MIT, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rooth, M.: Association with Focus. Ph.d. thesis, UMass, Amherst (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Büring, D.: Crossover Situations. Natural Language Semantics 12(1), 23–62 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Richards, N.: What moves where when in which language? Ph.d. thesis, MIT (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sauerland, U.: Syntactic Economy and Quantifier Raising. Ms., Universität Tübingen (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Charlow, S.: Inverse linking, Superiority, and QR. Ms., New York University (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heim, I., Kratzer, A.: Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larson, R.K., den Dikken, M., Ludlow, P.: Intensional Transitive Verbs and Abstract Clausal Complementation. Ms., SUNY at Stony Brook, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Merchant, J.: Antecedent-contained deletion in negative polarity items. Syntax 3(2), 144–150 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chierchia, G.: Reference to Kinds across Languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Magri, G.: Constraints on the readings of bare plural subjects of individual-level predicates: syntax or semantics? In: Bateman, L., Ussery, C. (eds.) Proceedings from NELS35, vol. I, pp. 391–402. GLSA Publications, Amherst (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. von Fintel, K., Iatridou, S.: Epistemic Containment. Linguistic Inquiry 34(2), 173–198 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beghelli, F., Stowell, T.: Distributivity and negation: the syntax of each and every. In: Szabolcsi, A. (ed.) Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 71–109. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Larson, R.K.: Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21(4), 589–632 (1990)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Farkas, D.: Evaluation indices and scope. In: Szabolcsi, A. (ed.) Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 183–215. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Keshet, E.: Good Intensions: Paving Two Roads to a Theory of the De re/De dicto Distinction. Ph.d. thesis, MIT (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Charlow, S. (2010). Can DP Be a Scope Island?. In: Icard, T., Muskens, R. (eds) Interfaces: Explorations in Logic, Language and Computation. ESSLLI ESSLLI 2008 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6211. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14729-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14729-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14728-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14729-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics