Introduction
Sauerland [1] uses data from inverse linking—cf. [2]—to motivate quantifier raising (QR) out of DP, proposing to derive Larson’s generalization—cf. [3]– regarding the scopal integrity of DP via an Economy-based constraint on QR (cf. [4]).
This squib is in four parts. I first lay out Sauerland’s three arguments for QR out of DP. I present (a slightly modified version of) his mechanism for constraining QR. I show that it both over- and under- generates. I conclude by arguing that the readings Sauerland uses to motivate his account don’t result from an islandrespecting QR mechanism. In short, each of the cases Sauerland considers involve DPs with ”special” scopal properties: plural demonstrative DPs, bare plural DPs, and antecedent-contained deletion (ACD)-hosting DPs. The argument that apparent wide-scope readings of plural demonstratives are only apparent is motivated using (so far as I know) new data from English, while the latter two cases receive independent motivation from the literature. The conclusion is that the question posed in the title of this paper can be answered in the affirmative.
Thanks to Chris Barker, Emma Cunningham, Polly Jacobson, Ezra Keshet, Philippe Schlenker, Uli Sauerland, Anna Szabolcsi, and an anonymous reviewer. This work was supported in part by NSF grant BCS-0902671 to Philippe Schlenker and an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to the author.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Sauerland, U.: DP Is Not a Scope Island. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2), 303–314 (2005)
May, R.: The Grammar of Quantification. Ph.d. thesis. MIT Press, Cambridge (1977)
Larson, R.K.: Quantifying into NP. Ms. MIT, Cambridge (1987)
Bruening, B.: QR Obeys Superiority: Frozen Scope and ACD. Linguistic Inquiry 32(2), 233–273 (2001)
Heim, I.: Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs. Journal of Semantics 9, 183–221 (1992)
May, R.: Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)
Huang, C.T.J.: Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Garland, New York (1998) (Ph.d. thesis, MIT, 1982)
Rooth, M.: Association with Focus. Ph.d. thesis, UMass, Amherst (1985)
Büring, D.: Crossover Situations. Natural Language Semantics 12(1), 23–62 (2004)
Richards, N.: What moves where when in which language? Ph.d. thesis, MIT (1997)
Sauerland, U.: Syntactic Economy and Quantifier Raising. Ms., Universität Tübingen (2000)
Charlow, S.: Inverse linking, Superiority, and QR. Ms., New York University (2009)
Heim, I., Kratzer, A.: Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell, Oxford (1998)
Larson, R.K., den Dikken, M., Ludlow, P.: Intensional Transitive Verbs and Abstract Clausal Complementation. Ms., SUNY at Stony Brook, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam (1997)
Merchant, J.: Antecedent-contained deletion in negative polarity items. Syntax 3(2), 144–150 (2000)
Chierchia, G.: Reference to Kinds across Languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339–405 (1998)
Magri, G.: Constraints on the readings of bare plural subjects of individual-level predicates: syntax or semantics? In: Bateman, L., Ussery, C. (eds.) Proceedings from NELS35, vol. I, pp. 391–402. GLSA Publications, Amherst (2004)
von Fintel, K., Iatridou, S.: Epistemic Containment. Linguistic Inquiry 34(2), 173–198 (2003)
Beghelli, F., Stowell, T.: Distributivity and negation: the syntax of each and every. In: Szabolcsi, A. (ed.) Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 71–109. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)
Larson, R.K.: Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21(4), 589–632 (1990)
Farkas, D.: Evaluation indices and scope. In: Szabolcsi, A. (ed.) Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 183–215. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)
Keshet, E.: Good Intensions: Paving Two Roads to a Theory of the De re/De dicto Distinction. Ph.d. thesis, MIT (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Charlow, S. (2010). Can DP Be a Scope Island?. In: Icard, T., Muskens, R. (eds) Interfaces: Explorations in Logic, Language and Computation. ESSLLI ESSLLI 2008 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6211. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14729-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14729-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14728-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14729-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)