Skip to main content

Accessibility of eGovernment Web Sites: Towards a Collaborative Retrofitting Approach

  • Conference paper
Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6179))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Accessibility benchmarking is efficient to raise awareness and initiate competition. However, traditional benchmarking is of little avail when it comes to removing barriers from eGovernment web sites in practice. Regulations and legal enforcement may be helpful in a long-term perspective. For more rapid progress both vendors and web site maintainers are willing to take short-term action towards improvements, provided that clear advise is available. The approach of the eGovernment Monitoring project (eGovMon) integrates benchmarking as a central activity in a user-driven project. In addition to benchmarking results, several other services and background information are provided to enable the users – in this case a group of Norwegian municipalities who want to improve the accessibility of their web sites – to gain real added value from benchmarking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nietzio, A., Olsen, M.G., Snaprud, M., Brynn, R.: eGovernment: New chance or new barrier people with disabilities? In: 8th International Conference on Electronic Government: Proceedings of ongoing research and projects of EGOV 2009, Trauner Druck: Linz, Schriftenreihe Informatik (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hengstberger, B., Miesenberger, K., Batusic, M., Chelbat, N., García, A.R.: Joint study programme on accessible web design. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W.L., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 182–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Capgemini: Smarter, Faster, Better eGovernment (2009), http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/benchmarjking/egov_benchmark_2009.pdf (retrieved February 1, 2010)

  4. Cullen, K., Kubitschke, L., Meyer, I.: Assessment of the status of eAccessibility in Europe (2007), http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/einclusion/library/studies/meac_study/index_en.htm (retrieved November 4, 2009)

  5. Cullen, K., Kubitschke, L., Boussios, T., Dolphion, C., Meyer, I.: Study report: Web accessibility in European countries: level of compliance with latest international accessibility specifications, notably WCAG 2.0, and approaches or plans to implement those specifications (2009), http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/einclusion/library/studies/docs/access_comply_main.pdf (retrieved January 28, 2010)

  6. Snaprud, M., Sawicka, A.: Large Scale Web Accessibility Evaluation - A European Perspective (2007), http://www.springerlink.com/content/f0l7754512717k01/

  7. Agency for Public Management and eGovernment (Difi): Quality of public web sites (2009), http://www.norge.no/kvalitet/

  8. Greeff, M., Kotzé, P.: A lightweight methodology to improve web accessibility. In: SAICSIT 2009: Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, pp. 30–39. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martín García, Y.S., Miguel González, B.S., Yelmo García, J.C.: Prosumers and accessibility: how to ensure a productive interaction. In: W4A 2009: Proceedings of the 2009 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibililty (W4A), pp. 50–53. ACM, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Web Accessibility Benchmarking Cluster: Unified Web Evaluation Methodology, UWEM 1.2 (2007), http://www.wabcluster.org/uwem1_2/ (retrieved November 4, 2009)

  11. World Wide Web Consortium: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Recommendation (May 5, 1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/ (retrieved November 4, 1999)

  12. Casado Martínez, C., Martínez-Normand, L., Olsen, M.G.: Is it possible to predict the manual web accessibility result using the automatic result? In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI (7). LNCS, vol. 5615, pp. 645–653. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brajnik, G.: Towards a sustainable web accessibility. In: Accessible Design in the Digital World, ADDW (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nietzio, A., Olsen, M.G., Eibegger, M., Snaprud, M. (2010). Accessibility of eGovernment Web Sites: Towards a Collaborative Retrofitting Approach. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6179. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14097-6_75

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14097-6_75

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14096-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14097-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics