Skip to main content

An Automatic Indicator of the Reusability of Learning Objects Based on Metadata That Satisfies Completeness Criteria

  • Conference paper
Book cover Technology Enhanced Learning. Quality of Teaching and Educational Reform (TECH-EDUCATION 2010)

Abstract

The search for learning objects in open repositories is currently a tedious task, owing to the vast amount of resources available and the fact that most of them do not have associated ratings to help users make a choice. In order to tackle this problem, we propose a reusability indicator, which can be calculated automatically using the metadata that describes the objects, allowing us to select those materials most likely to be reused. In order for this reusability indicator to be applied, metadata records must reach a certain amount of completeness, guaranteeing that the material is adequately described. This reusability indicator is tested in two studies on the Merlot and eLera repositories, and results obtained offer evidence to support their effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boyle, T.: Design principles for authoring dynamic, reusable learning objects. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 19(1), 46–58 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brownfield, G., Oliver, R.: Factors influencing the discovery and reusability of digital resources for teaching and learning. In: Crisp, G., Thiele, D., Scholten, I., Barker, S., Baron, J. (eds.) Interact, Integrate, Impact: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Adelaide, ASCILITE, pp. 74–83 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Currier, S., Campbell, L.: Evaluating learning resources for reusability: the “dner & learning objects” study. In: Proceeding of The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) Auckland, New Zealand (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Daniel, B., Mohan, P.: A Model for evaluating learning objects. In: Proceeding of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 50–60 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Downes, S.: Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects 3, 29–44 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duval, E., Warkentyne, K., Haenni, F., Forte, E., Cardinaels, K., Verhoeven, B., Durm, R.V., Hendrikx, K., Forte, M.W., Ebel, N., Macowicz, M.: The ariadne knowledge pool system. Communications of the ACM 44(5), 72–78 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gray, A., MacDonell, S.: A comparison of techniques for developing predictive models of software metrics. Information and Software Technology 39(6), 425–437 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huddlestone, J., Pike, J.: Learning object reuse – A four tier model. People and systems - who are we designing for (November 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kay, R., Knaack, L.: Evaluating the learning in learning objects. Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning 22(1), 5–28 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelty, C., Burrus, C., Baraniuk, R.: Peer review anew: Three principles and a case study in postpublication quality assurance. Proceedings of the IEEE 96(6), 1000–1011 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Margaritopoulos, T., Margaritopoulos, M., Mavridis, I., Manitsaris, A.: A fine-grained metric system for the completeness of metadata. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference, Metadata and Semantic Research 2009, Milan, Italy, October 1-2, pp. 83–94 (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ochoa, X., Duval, E.: Quality metrics for learning object metadata. In: Duval, E., Klamma, R., Wolpers, M. (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, pp. 1004–1011 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ochoa, X., Duval, E.: Measuring learning object reuse. In: Dillenbourg, P., Specht, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2008. LNCS, vol. 5192, pp. 322–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Ochoa, X., Duval, E.: Relevance ranking metrics for learning objects. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 1(1), 34–48 (2008b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Palmer, K., Richardson, P.: Learning Object Reusability – Motivation, Production and Use. In: 11th International Conference of the Association for Learning Technology (ALT). University of Exeter, Devon (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sánchez-Alonso, S., Sicilia, M.A.: Normative specifications of learning objects and processes. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2(3), 3–12 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sanz-Rodríguez, J., Margaritopoulos, M., Margaritopoulos, T., Dodero, J.M., Sánchez-Alonso, S., Manitsaris, A. (2010). An Automatic Indicator of the Reusability of Learning Objects Based on Metadata That Satisfies Completeness Criteria. In: Lytras, M.D., et al. Technology Enhanced Learning. Quality of Teaching and Educational Reform. TECH-EDUCATION 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 73. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13166-0_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13166-0_68

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13165-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13166-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics