Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Präsentation, Navigation und Interaktion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interaktive Systeme

Part of the book series: eXamen.press ((EXAMEN))

  • 12k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das vorausgegangene Kapitel hat eine Einführung in das Thema Informationsvisualisierung gegeben, die abstrakte Natur der zu Grunde liegenden Daten betont und typische Ziele, wie Exploration und Analyse, eingeführt. Im Fokus stand die Präsentation von Lösungen für Probleme, wie beispielsweise: Gibt es einen Zusammenhang zwischen den Attributen eines mehrdimensionalen Produktdatensatzes? Wie kann ich mir schnell einen Überblick über die hierarchische Organisation eines Unternehmens verschaffen?Wer sind die Freunde meiner Freunde in einem sozialen Online-Netzwerk, und welche Interessen haben sie? Dabei ging es vor allem darum, wie abstrakte Daten repräsentiert werden können. Je nach Aufgabe sowie Art und Dimensionalität der Daten müssen geeignete visuelle Kodierungen gefunden werden. Dabei kommen Raum und Zeit sowie Visualisierungsattribute, wie Farbe, Form, Orientierung oder Verbindung zum Einsatz

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Bade, R., Cordes, J., Mewes, M., Preim, B. (2008). Interaction techniques for case selection in medical computer based training systems. In Mensch und Computer, S. 247–256. Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tominski, C., Abello, J., Schumann, H. (2009). Technical section: Cgv–an interactive graph visualization system. Comput. Graph., 33 (6): 660–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, H., Trapp, M., Jobst, M., Döllner, J. (2008). Interactive multi-perspective views of virtual 3d landscape and city models. In Proc. of the International Conference on GI Science (AGILE ’08), S. 301–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, M., Snibbe, S. S., Tversky, O. J., Reiss, S. P. (1993). Stretching the rubber sheet: A metaphor for viewing large layouts on small screens. In Proc. of the ACM Symposium on User interface Software and Technology (UIST’93), S. 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinlay, J. D., Robertson, G. G., Card, S. K. (1991). The perspective wall: Detail and context smoothly integrated. In Proc. of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, S. 173–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B. (1996). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, S. 336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, J. S., Kang, Y., Stasko, J., Jacko, J. (2007). Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13 (6): 1224–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnas, G. W. (2006). A fisheye follow-up: Further reflections on focus + context. In Proc. of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, S. 999–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapp, M., Glander, T., Buchholz, H., Döllner, J. (2008). 3d generalization lenses for interactive focus + context visualization of virtual city models. In Proc. of IEEE Information Visualization (IV ’08), S. 356–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, D. A. (2002). Information visualization and visual data mining. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 8(1):1–8.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2005). Top 10 unsolved information visualization problems. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl., 25(4):12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matkovic, K., Freiler, W., Gracanin, D., Hauser, H. (2008). Comvis: A coordinated multiple views system for prototyping new visualization technology. Proc. of Information Visualisation (IV’08), S. 215–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, S., Baudisch, P., Gutwin, C., Irani, P. (2008). Wedge: Clutter–free visualization of off–screen locations. In Proc. of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, S. 787–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, D. C., Cutrell, E., Sarin, R., Horvitz, E. (2004). Zonezoom: Map navigation for smartphones with recursive view segmentation. In Proc. of Advanced visual interfaces (AVI ’04), S. 231–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnick, P., Cline, D., Jeschke, S., Razdan, A., Wonka, P. (2010). Route visualization using detail lenses. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(2):235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldonado, W., Michelle Q., Woodruff, A., Kuchinsky, A. (2000). Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization. In Proc. of Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI ’00), S. 110–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, M., Stellmach, S., Dachselt, R. (2009). Paperlens: Advanced magic lens interaction above the tabletop. In Proce. of the ACM Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS ’09:), S. 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, R. (2007). Information Visualization: Design for Interaction (2nd Edition). Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. C. (2007). State of the art: Coordinated & multiple views in exploratory visualization. Proc. of Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV’07), 0: 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (1997). Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bederson, B. B. (2000). Fisheye menus. In Proc. of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’00), S. 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bederson, B. B., Clamage, A., Czerwinski, M. P., Robertson, G. G. (2004). Datelens: A fisheye calendar interface for pdas. ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction, 11(1):90–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtschlag, L., Karrer, T., Borchers, J. (2009). Fly: a tool to author planar presentations. In Proc. of the International Conference on Human factors in computing systems, S. 547–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, S. (2007). Software Visualization – Visualizing the Structure, Behaviour, and Evolution of Software. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kosara, R., Miksch, S., Hauser, H. (2001). Semantic depth of field. In Proc. of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (INFOVIS’01), S. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlberg, C. (1996). Spotfire: An information exploration environment. SIGMOD Rec., 25(4):25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. R. (1990). Envisioning Information. Graphics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büring, T. (2007). Zoomable User Interfaces on Small Screens - Presentation & Interaction Design for Pen-Operated Mobile Devices. PhD Thesis, Universität Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, C. (2004). Information Visualization - Perception for Design. 2. Auflage. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. C., Fishkin, K., Bier, E. A. (1994). The movable filter as a user interface tool. In Proc. of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, S. 306–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnas, G. W. (1986). Generalized fisheye views. Proc. of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 17(4):16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (2003). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büring, T., Gerken, J., Reiterer, H. (2006). Usability of overview-supported zooming on small screens with regard to individual differences in spatial ability. In Proc. of Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI ’06), S. 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bederson, B. B. (2001). Photomesa: a zoomable image browser using quantum treemaps and bubblemaps. In Proc. of the ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST’01), S. 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tominski, C. (2006). Event-Based Visualization for User-Centered Visual Analysis. PhD Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, A., Karlson, A., Bederson, B. B. (2008). A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(1):1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuseler, M., Lopez, N., Schumann, H. (2000). A scalable framework for information visualization. In Proc. of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (INFOVIS ’00), S. 27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät Informatik, Universität Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106, Magdeburg, Deutschland

    Bernhard Preim & Raimund Dachselt

Authors
  1. Bernhard Preim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raimund Dachselt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernhard Preim .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Preim, B., Dachselt, R. (2010). Präsentation, Navigation und Interaktion. In: Interaktive Systeme. eXamen.press. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05402-0_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation