Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5605))

Abstract

Information-based argumentation aims to model the partner’s reasoning apparatus to the extent that an agent can work with it to achieve outcomes that are mutually satisfactory and lay the foundation for continued interaction and perhaps lasting business relationships. Information-based agents take observations at face value, qualify them with a belief probability and build models solely on the basis of messages received. Using augmentative dialogue that describes what is good or bad about proposals, these agents observe such statements and aim to model the way their partners react, and then to generate dialogue that works in harmony with their partner’s reasoning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sierra, C., Debenham, J.: Information-based agency. In: Proceedings of Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2007, Hyderabad, India, pp. 1513–1518 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sierra, C., Debenham, J.: Trust and honour in information-based agency. In: Stone, P., Weiss, G. (eds.) Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems AAMAS 2006, Hakodate, Japan, pp. 1225–1232. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Sierra, C., Debenham, J.: The LOGIC Negotiation Model. In: Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems AAMAS 2007, Honolulu, Hawai’i, pp. 1026–1033 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dung, P.M.: On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321–358 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S., Jennings, N., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, E.: Argumentation-based negotiation. Knowledge Engineering Review 18, 343–375 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheeseman, P., Stutz, J.: On The Relationship between Bayesian and Maximum Entropy Inference. In: Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, pp. 445–461. American Institute of Physics, Melville (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paris, J.: Common sense and maximum entropy. Synthese 117, 75–93 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaynes, E.: Information theory and statistical mechanics: Part I. Physical Review 106, 620–630 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, Y., Bandar, Z.A., McLean, D.: An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15, 871–882 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewicki, R.J., Saunders, D.M., Minton, J.W.: Essentials of Negotiation. McGraw Hill, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bentahar, J., Mbarki, M., Meyer, J.J.C., Moulin, B.: Strategic agent communication: An argumentation-driven approach. In: Baldoni, M., Son, T.C., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Winikoff, M. (eds.) DALT 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5397, pp. 233–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kakas, A., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P.: Layered strategies and protocols layered strategies and protocols for argumentation-based agent interaction. In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds.) ArgMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3366, pp. 64–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mbarki, M., Bentahar, J., Moulin, B.: Specification and complexity of strategic-based reasoning using argumentation. In: Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4766, pp. 142–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Maslow, A.H.: A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review 50, 370–396 (1943)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sierra, C., Debenham, J. (2009). Information-Based Argumentation. In: Meyer, JJ.C., Broersen, J. (eds) Knowledge Representation for Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. KRAMAS 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5605. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05301-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05301-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05300-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-05301-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics