Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attention Speeds Up Visual Information Processing: Selection for Perception or Selection for Action?

  • Conference paper
KI 2009: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5803))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1612 Accesses

Abstract

Attention speeds up information processing. Although this finding has a long history in experimental psychology, it has found less regard in computational models of visual attention. In psychological research, two frameworks explain the function of attention.Selection for perception emphasizes that perception- or consciousness-related processing presupposes selection of relevant information, whereas selection for action emphasizes that action constraints make selection necessary. In the present study, we ask whether or how far attention, as measured by the speed-up of information processing, is based on selection for perception or selection for action. The accelerating effect was primarily based on selection for perception, but there was also a substantial effect of selection for action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J.F.X., Goodale, M.A.: Size contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr. Biol. 5, 679–685 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allport, A.: Attention and Selection-For-Action. In: Perspectives on Perception and Action, pp. 395–419. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ansorge, U., Neumann, O.: Intentions Determine the Effect of Invisible Metacontrast-Masked Primes: Evidence for Top-Down Contingencies in a Peripheral Cuing Task. J. Exp. Psychol. Human. 31, 762–777 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Broadbent, D.E.: Perception and Communication. Pergamon Press, London (1958)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Bröckelmann, A.K., Junghöfer, M., Scharlau, I., Hamker, F.H.: Reentrant processing from attentional task sets: Converging support from magnetoencephalography and computational modeling (in preparation)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deutsch, J.A., Deutsch, D.: Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychol. Rev. 70, 80–90 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W., Johnston, J.C.: Involuntary Covert Orienting is Contingent on Attentional Control Settings. J. Exp. Psychol. Human. 18, 1030–1044 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hamker, F.H.: A Dynamic Model of How Feature Cues Guide Spatial Attention. Vision Res. 44, 501–521 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Itti, L., Koch, C.: Computational Modeling of Visual Attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 194–203 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kahneman, D.: Treisman: The Cost of Visual Filtering. J. Exp. Psychol. Human. 9, 510–522 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mack, A., Rock, I.: Inattentional Blindness. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neumann, O., Scharlau, I.: Visual Attention and the Mechanism of Metacontrast. Psychol. Res. – Psych. Fo. 71, 626–633 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neumann, O., Scharlau, I.: Experiments on the Fehrer-Raab-Effect and on the “Weather-Station-Model” of visual backward masking. Psych. Fo. 71, 667–677 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pashler, H.E.: The Psychology of Attention. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Posner, M.I.: Orienting of Attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32, 3–25 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rensink, R.A.: Change Detection. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 245–277 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rensink, R.A., O’Regan, J.K., Clark, J.J.: To See or not to See: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes. Psychol. Sci. 8, 368–373 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Riddoch, M.J., Humphreys, G.W., Edwards, S., Baker, T., Willson, K.: Seeing the Action: Neuropsychological Evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 82–89 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scharlau, I.: Leading, but not Trailing, Primes Influence Temporal Order Perception: Further Evidence for an Attentional Account of Perceptual Latency Priming. Percept. Psychophys. 64, 1346–1360 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scharlau, I.: Evidence Against Response Bias in Temporal Order Tasks with Attention Manipulation by Masked Primes. Psychol. Res. – Psych. Fo. 68, 224–236 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scharlau, I.: Temporal Processes in Prime-Mask Interaction: Assessing Perceptual Consequences of Masked Information. Adv. Cognitive Psychol. 3, 241–255 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Scharlau, I., Ansorge, U.: Direct Parameter Specification of an Attention Shift: Evidence from Perceptual Latency Priming. Vision Res. 43, 1351–1363 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Scharlau, I., Ansorge, U., Horstmann, G.: Latency Facilitation in Temporal Order Judgments: Time Course of Facilitation as Function of Judgment Type. Acta Psychol. 122, 129–159 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scharlau, I., Neumann, O.: Perceptual Latency Priming by Masked and Unmasked Stimuli: Evidence for an Attentional Explanation. Psychol. Res. – Psych. Fo. 67, 184–197 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schneider, W.X., Deubel, H.: Selection-for-Perception and Selection-for-spatial-motor-action are coupled by visual attention: a review of recent findings and new evidence from stimulus-driven-saccade control. In: Prinz, W., Hommel, B. (eds.) Attentenion and Performance XIX. Common mechanisms in perception and action, pp. 609–627. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shore, D.I., Spence, C., Klein, R.M.: Visual Prior Entry. Psychol. Sci. 12, 205–212 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Simons, D.J., Chabris, C.F.: Gorillas in our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events. Perception 28, 1059–1074 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stelmach, L.B., Herdman, C.M.: Directed Attention and Perception of Temporal Order. J. Exp. Psychol. Human. 17, 539–550 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Titchener, E.M.: Lectures on the Elementary Psychology of Feeling and Attention. MacMillan, New York (1908)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Treisman, A., Gelade, G.: A Feature Integration Theory of Attention. Cognitive Psychol. 12, 97–136 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Treisman, A., Schmidt, H.: Illusory Conjunctions in the Perception of Objects. Cognitive Psychol. 14, 107–141 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Weiß, K., Scharlau, I.: Simultaneity and Temporal Order Perception: Different Sides of the Same Coin? Evidence from a Visual Prior Entry Study (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wolfe, J.M.: Guided Search 2.0. A Revised Model of Visual Search. Psychon. B. Rev. 1, 202–238 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wundt, W.: Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie [Main Features of Physiological Psychology]. Engelmann, Leipzig (1887)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yantis, S., Jonides, J.: Abrupt Visual Onsets and Selective Attention: Voluntary versus Automatic Allocation. J. Exp. Psychol. Human. 16, 121–134 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Paderborn, Warburgerstr.100, 33098, Paderborn, Germany

    Katharina Weiß & Ingrid Scharlau

Authors
  1. Katharina Weiß
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ingrid Scharlau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. GET Lab, University of Paderborn, Pohlweg 47-49, 33098, Paderborn, Germany

    Bärbel Mertsching , Marcus Hund  & Zaheer Aziz ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weiß, K., Scharlau, I. (2009). Attention Speeds Up Visual Information Processing: Selection for Perception or Selection for Action?. In: Mertsching, B., Hund, M., Aziz, Z. (eds) KI 2009: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5803. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04617-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04617-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04616-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04617-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation