Skip to main content

Segregating Confident Predictions of Chemicals’ Properties for Virtual Screening of Drugs

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5518))

Abstract

In this paper we present a methodology for evaluating the confidence in the prediction of a physicochemical or biological property. Identifying unreliable compounds’ predictions is crucial for the modern drug discovery process.This task is accomplished by the combination of the method of prediction with a self-organizing map. In this way, the method is able to segregate unconfident predictions as well as confident predictions. We applied the method to four different data sets, and we obtained significant differences in the average predictions of our segregation. This approach constitutes a novel way for evaluating confidence, since it not only looks for extrapolation situations but also it identifies interpolation problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Augen, J.: The Evolving Role of Information Technology in the Drug Discovery Process. Drug Discov. Today 7, 315–323 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barril, X., Hubbard, R.E., Morley, S.D.: Virtual Screening in Structure-Based Drug Discovery. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 4, 779–791 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. van de Waterbeemd, H., Gifford, E.: ADMET in Silico Modelling: Towards Prediction Paradise? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2, 192–204 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Todeschini, R., Consonni, V.: Handbook of Molecular Descriptors. Wiley–VCH, Weinheim (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Yap, C.W., Li, H., Ji, Z.L., Chen, Y.Z.: Regression Methods for Developing QSAR and QSPR Models to Predict Compounds of Specific Pharmacodynamic, Pharmacokinetic and Toxicological Properties. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 7, 1097–1107 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tetko, I.V., Bruneau, P., Mewes, H.-W., Rohrer, D., Poda, G.: Can We Estimate the Accuracy of ADME-Tox Predictions? Drug Discov. Today 11, 700–707 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jónsdóttir, S.Ó., Jørgensen, F.S., Brunak, S.: Prediction Methods and Databases within Chemoinformatics: Emphasis on Drugs and Drug Candidates. Bioinformatics 21, 2145–2160 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jaworska, J., Nikolova-Jeliazkova, N., Aldenberg, T.: QSAR Applicabilty Domain Estimation by Projection of the Training Set Descriptor Space: A Review. Altern. Lab. Anim. 33, 445–459 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Konovalov, D.A., Sim, N., Deconinck, E., Heyden, Y.V., Coomans, D.: Statistical Confidence for Variable Selection in QSAR Models Via Monte Carlo Cross-Validation. J. Chem. Inf. Model 48, 370–383 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yaffe, D., Cohen, Y., Espinosa, G., Arenas, A., Giralt, F.: Fuzzy ARTMAP and Back-Propagation Neural Networks Based Quantitative Structure - Property Relationships (QSPRs) for Octanol-Water Partition Coefficient of Organic Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42, 162–183 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. The Physical Properties Database (PHYSPROP) is marketed by Syracuse Research Corporation (SRC), http://www.syrres.com/esc/

  12. Soto, A.J., Cecchini, R.L., Vazquez, G.E., Ponzoni, I.: A Wrapper-Based Feature Selection Method for ADMET Prediction Using Evolutionary Computing. In: Marchiori, E., Moore, J.H. (eds.) EvoBIO 2008. LNCS, vol. 4973, pp. 188–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps, vol. II. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Winkler, D.A.: Neural Networks in ADME and Toxicity Prediction. Drug. Future 29, 1043–1057 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De Maesschalck, R., Jouan-Rimbaud, D., Massart, D.L.: The Mahalanobis Distance. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 50, 1–18 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Qin, S.J.: Statistical Process Monitoring: Basics and Beyond. J. Chemometr. 17, 480–502 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Soto, A.J., Ponzoni, I., Vazquez, G.E. (2009). Segregating Confident Predictions of Chemicals’ Properties for Virtual Screening of Drugs. In: Omatu, S., et al. Distributed Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Bioinformatics, Soft Computing, and Ambient Assisted Living. IWANN 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5518. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02481-8_153

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02481-8_153

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02480-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02481-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics