Skip to main content

Verifying Social Expectations by Model Checking Truncated Paths

  • Conference paper
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems IV (COIN 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5428))

Abstract

One approach to moderating the expected behaviour of agents in open societies is the use of explicit languages for defining norms, conditional commitments and/or social expectations, together with infrastructure supporting conformance checking. This paper presents a logical account of the fulfilment and violation of social expectations modelled as conditional rules over a hybrid linear propositional temporal logic. Our semantics captures the intuition that the fulfilment or violation of an expectation must be determined without recourse to information from later states. We define a means of updating expectations from one state to the next based on formula progression, and show how conformance checking was implemented by extending the MCLITE and MCFULL algorithms of the Hybrid Logics Model Checker.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cortés, U.: Electronic institutions and agents. AgentLink News 15, 14–15 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dragone, L.: Hybrid logics model checker (2005), http://luigidragone.com/hlmc/

  3. Cranefield, S.: A rule language for modelling and monitoring social expectations in multi-agent systems. In: Boissier, O., Padget, J., Dignum, V., Lindemann, G., Matson, E., Ossowski, S., Sichman, J.S., Vázquez-Salceda, J. (eds.) ANIREM 2005 and OOOP 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3913, pp. 246–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Markey, N., Schnoebelen, P.: Model checking a path. In: Amadio, R., Lugiez, D. (eds.) CONCUR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2761, pp. 251–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bacchus, F., Kabanza, F.: Using temporal logics to express search control knowledge for planning. Artificial Intelligence 116(1-2), 123–191 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Blackburn, P., de Rijke, M., Venema, Y.: Modal Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisner, C., Fisman, D., Havlicek, J., Lustig, Y., McIsaac, A., Campenhout, D.V.: Reasoning with temporal logic on truncated paths. In: Hunt Jr., W.A., Somenzi, F. (eds.) CAV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2725, pp. 27–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Franceschet, M., de Rijke, M.: Model checking hybrid logics (with an application to semistructured data). Journal of Applied Logic 4(3), 279–304 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Alberti, M., Chesani, F., Gavanelli, M., Lamma, E., Mello, P., Torroni, P.: Compliance verification of agent interaction: a logic-based software tool. In: Trappl, R. (ed.) Cybernetics and Systems 2004. Austrian Society for Cybernetics Studies, vol. II, pp. 570–575 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Verdicchio, M., Colombetti, M.: A logical model of social commitment for agent communication. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2003), pp. 528–535. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bentahar, J., Moulin, B., Meyer, J.J.C., Chaib-draa, B.: A logical model for commitment and argument network for agent communication. In: AAMAS 2004, pp. 792–799. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Viganò, F., Colombetti, M.: Symbolic model checking of institutions. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on electronic commerce, pp. 35–44. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Endriss, U.: Temporal logics for representing agent communication protocols. In: Dignum, F.P.M., van Eijk, R.M., Flores, R. (eds.) AC 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3859, pp. 15–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Spoletini, P., Verdicchio, M.: An automata-based monitoring technique for commitment-based multi-agent systems. In: Hubner, J.F., et al. (eds.) COIN 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5428, pp. 172–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cranefield, S., Winikoff, M. (2009). Verifying Social Expectations by Model Checking Truncated Paths. In: Hübner, J.F., Matson, E., Boissier, O., Dignum, V. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems IV . COIN 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5428. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00443-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00443-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00442-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00443-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics