Skip to main content

Increasing Interpretations

  • Conference paper
  • 713 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5144))

Abstract

The paper at hand introduces a refinement of interpretation based termination criteria for term rewrite systems in the dependency pair setting. Traditional methods share the property that—in order to be successful—all rewrite rules must (weakly) decrease with respect to some measure. The novelty of our approach is that we allow some rules to increase the interpreted value. These rules are found by simultaneously searching for adequate polynomial interpretations while considering the information of the dependency graph. We prove that our method extends the termination proving power of linear natural interpretations. Furthermore, this generalization perfectly fits the recursive SCC decomposition algorithm which is implemented in virtually every termination prover dealing with term rewrite systems.

This research is supported by FWF (Austrian Science Fund) project P18763.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arts, T., Giesl, J.: Termination of term rewriting using dependency pairs. Theoretical Computer Science 236, 133–178 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Nipkow, T.: Term Rewriting and All That. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: An extensible SAT-solver. In: Giunchiglia, E., Tacchella, A. (eds.) SAT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2919, pp. 502–518. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Endrullis, J.: Jambox (2007), http://joerg.endrullis.de

  5. Endrullis, J., Waldmann, J., Zantema, H.: Matrix interpretations for proving termination of term rewriting. Journal of Automated Reasoning 40(2-3), 195–220 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fuhs, C., Giesl, J., Middeldorp, A., Schneider-Kamp, P., Thiemann, R., Zankl, H.: SAT solving for termination analysis with polynomial interpretations. In: Marques-Silva, J., Sakallah, K.A. (eds.) SAT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4501, pp. 340–354. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Geser, A., Hofbauer, D., Waldmann, J., Zantema, H.: On tree automata that certify termination of left-linear term rewriting systems. Information and Computation 205(4), 512–534 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Giesl, J., Schneider-Kamp, P., Thiemann, R.: AProVE 1.2: Automatic termination proofs in the dependency pair framework. In: Furbach, U., Shankar, N. (eds.) IJCAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4130, pp. 281–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Giesl, J., Thiemann, R., Schneider-Kamp, P., Falke, S.: Mechanizing and improving dependency pairs. Journal of Automated Reasoning 37(3), 155–203 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirokawa, N., Middeldorp, A.: Dependency pairs revisited. In: van Oostrom, V. (ed.) RTA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3091, pp. 249–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hirokawa, N., Middeldorp, A.: Polynomial interpretations with negative coefficients. In: Buchberger, B., Campbell, J.A. (eds.) AISC 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3249, pp. 185–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hirokawa, N., Middeldorp, A.: Automating the dependency pair method. Information and Computation 199(1,2), 172–199 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirokawa, N., Middeldorp, A.: Tyrolean termination tool: Techniques and features. Information and Computation 205(4), 474–511 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hong, H., Jakuš, D.: Testing positiveness of polynomials. Journal of Automated Reasoning 21(1), 23–38 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Koprowski, A., Waldmann, J.: Arctic termination ⋯ below zero. In: Voronkov, A. (ed.) RTA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5117. Springer, Heidelberg (to appear, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Korp, M., Middeldorp, A.: Proving termination of rewrite systems using bounds. In: Baader, F. (ed.) RTA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4533, pp. 273–287. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurihara, M., Kondo, H.: Efficient BDD encodings for partial order constraints with application to expert systems in software verification. In: Orchard, B., Yang, C., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3029, pp. 827–837. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lankford, D.: On proving term rewrite systems are noetherian. Technical Report MTP-3, Louisiana Technical University, Ruston, LA, USA (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lucas, S.: On the relative power of polynomials with real, rational, and integer coefficients in proofs of termination of rewriting. Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing 17(1), 49–73 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Waldmann, J.: Matchbox: A tool for match-bounded string rewriting. In: van Oostrom, V. (ed.) RTA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3091, pp. 85–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zantema, H.: Reducing right-hand sides for termination. In: Middeldorp, A., van Oostrom, V., van Raamsdonk, F., de Vrijer, R. (eds.) Processes, Terms and Cycles: Steps on the Road to Infinity. LNCS, vol. 3838, pp. 173–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Zantema, H., Waldmann, J.: Termination by quasi-periodic interpretations. In: Baader, F. (ed.) RTA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4533, pp. 404–418. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Serge Autexier John Campbell Julio Rubio Volker Sorge Masakazu Suzuki Freek Wiedijk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zankl, H., Middeldorp, A. (2008). Increasing Interpretations. In: Autexier, S., Campbell, J., Rubio, J., Sorge, V., Suzuki, M., Wiedijk, F. (eds) Intelligent Computer Mathematics. CICM 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5144. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85110-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85110-3_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85109-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85110-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics