Skip to main content

EFL Learner Reading Time Model for Evaluating Reading Proficiency

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4919))

Abstract

We propose a reading time model for learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) that is based on a learner’s reading proficiency and the linguistic properties of sentences. Reading proficiency here refers to a learner’s reading score on the Test of English for International Communications (TOEIC), and the linguistic properties are the lexical, syntactic and discourse complexities of a sentence. We used natural language processing technology to automatically extract these linguistic properties, and developed a model using multiple regression analysis as a learning algorithm in combining the learner’s proficiency and linguistic properties. Experimental results showed that our reading time model predicted sentence-reading time with a 22.9% error rate, which is lower than the models constructed based on linguistic properties proposed in previous studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alderson, J.C.: Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, T.: Extensive reading: Speed and comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 1(1) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carver, R.P.: Optimal rate of reading prose. Reading Research Quarterly 18(1), 56–88 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Flesch, R.: A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology 32, 221–233 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frazier, L., Rayner, K.: Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 14, 178–210 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. JACET. JACET 4000 Basic Words. The Japan Association of College English Teachers, Tokyo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.A.: The Psychology of Reading and Language Comprehension. Allyn and Bacon, Newton (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kotani, K., et al.: Effects of syntactic factors on EFL learners’ reading time. Information Technology Letters 6, 457–460 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lougheed, L.: How to Prepare for the TOEIC Test: Test of English for International Communication. Barron’s Educational Series, Inc., Hauppanuge, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Naganuma, N., Wada, T.T.: Measurement of English reading ability by reading speed and text readability. JLTA Journal 5, 34–52 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nagata, R., et al.: A method of rating English reading skill automatically: Rating English reading skill using reading speed. Computer & Education 12, 99–103 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sano, H., Ino, M.: Measurement of difficulty on English grammar and automatic analysis. IPSJ SIG Notes 117, 5–12 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schwarm, S.E., Ostendorf, M.: Reading level assessment using support vector machines and statistical language models. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 523–530 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sekine, S., Grishman, A.: A corpus-based probabilistic grammar with only two non-terminals. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, pp. 216–223 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shizuka, T.: The effects of stimulus presentation mode, question type, and reading speed incorporation on the reliability/validity of a computer-based sentence reading test. JACET Bulletin 29, 155–172 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, E.A., Kincaid, P.: Derivation and validation of the automated readability index for use with technical materials. Human Factors 12, 457–464 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Someya, Y.: Word Level Checker: Vocabulary Profiling Program by AWK, Ver. 1.5 (2000) (consulted November 6, 2006), http://www1.kamakuranet.ne.jp/someya/wlc/wlc_manual.html

  18. The Chauncery Group International, Ltd., TOEIC Technical Manual, The Chauncery Group International, Ltd., Princeton, NJ (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yoshimi, T., et al.: A method of measuring reading time for assessing EFL-learners’ reading ability. Transactions of Japanese Society for Information and Systems in Education 22(1), 24–29 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Alexander Gelbukh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kotani, K., Yoshimi, T., Kutsumi, T., Sata, I., Isahara, H. (2008). EFL Learner Reading Time Model for Evaluating Reading Proficiency. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4919. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78135-6_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78135-6_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78134-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78135-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics