Skip to main content

A New Supervised Evaluation Criterion for Region Based Segmentation Methods

  • Conference paper
Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems (ACIVS 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 4678))

Abstract

We present in this article a new supervised evaluation criterion that enables the quantification of the quality of region segmentation algorithms. This criterion is compared with seven well-known criteria available in this context. To that end, we test the different methods on natural images by using a subjective evaluation involving different experts from the French community in image processing. Experimental results show the benefit of this new criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Haralick, R.H., Shapiro, L.G.: Image Segmentation Techniques. Image Segmentation Techniques, Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing (CVGIP) 29, 100–132 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heath, M., Sarkar, S., Sanocki, T., Bowyer, K.: Comparison of Edge Detectors: A Methodology and Initial Study. Computer Vision and Image Understanding (CVIU) 69, 38–54 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Freixenet, J., Muñoz, X., Raba, D., Marti, J., Cufi, X.: Yet Another Survey on Image Segmentation: Region and Boundary Information Integration. In: Tistarelli, M., Bigun, J., Jain, A.K. (eds.) ECCV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2359, pp. 408–422. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andrey, P.: Selectionist Relaxation: Genetic Algorithms Applied to Image Segmentation. Image and Vision Computing 17, 175–187 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhanu, B., Peng, J.: Adaptative Integrated Image Segmentation and Object Recognition. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics 30, 427–441 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavallaro, A., Gelasca, E.D., Ebrahimi, T.: Objective evaluation of segmentation quality using spatio-temporal context. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 301–304. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, X., Marti, C., Irniger, C., Bunke, H.: Distance Measures for Image Segmentation Evaluation. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2006, Article ID 35909 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, Y.J.: A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation. Pattern Recognition 29, 1335–1346 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chabrier, S., Rosenberger, C., Laurent, H., Emile, B., Marché, P.: Evaluating the segmentation result of a gray-level image. In: European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pp. 953–956 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Montresor, S., Lado, M.J., Tahoces, P.G., Souto, M., Vidal, J.J.: Analytic wavelets applied for the detection of microcalcifications. A tool for digital mammography. In: European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pp. 2215–2218 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marques, F., Cuberas, G., Gasull, A., Seron, D., Moreso, F., Joshi, N.: Mathematic morphology approach for renal biopsy analysis. In: European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), pp. 2195–2198 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, W.W., Richardson, I., Gow, K., Zhao, Y., Staff, R.: Hybrid segmentation of the hippocampus in MR images. In: European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chabrier, S., Rosenberger, C., Emile, B.: Evaluation methodologies of image processing: an overview. In: 8th International IEEE Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Comaniciu, D., Meer, P.: Mean Shift: A Robust Approach Toward Feature Space Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern analysis and Machine Intelligence 24, 603–619 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deng, Y., Manjunath, B.S.: Unsupervised segmentation of color-texture regions in images and video. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kermad, C., Vozel, B., Chehdi, K.: Hyperspectral image analysis and dimensionality: a scalar scheme through multi-thresholding technique. In: Proceedings of the Eos/Spie Symposium on Remote sensing, vol. 31(4170) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vinet, L.: Segmentation et mise en correspondance de régions de paires d’images stéréoscopiques, Thése de Doctorat de l’université de Paris IX Dauphine (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, Q., Dom, B.: Quantitative Methods of Evaluating Image Segmentation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP’95), vol. 3, pp. 53–56 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yasnoff, W.A., Mui, J.K., Bacus, J.W.: Error measures for scene segmentation. Pattern Recognition 9, 217–231 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D., Malik, J.: A Database of Human Segmented Natural Images and its Application to Evaluating Segmentation Algorithms and Measuring Ecological Statistics. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference Computer Vision, pp. 416–423 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacQueen, J.B.: Some Methods for classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. In: Proceedings of 5-th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 281–297. University of California Press, Berkeley (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bezdek, J.C.: Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms. Plenum Press, New York (1981)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jacques Blanc-Talon Wilfried Philips Dan Popescu Paul Scheunders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hafiane, A., Chabrier, S., Rosenberger, C., Laurent, H. (2007). A New Supervised Evaluation Criterion for Region Based Segmentation Methods. In: Blanc-Talon, J., Philips, W., Popescu, D., Scheunders, P. (eds) Advanced Concepts for Intelligent Vision Systems. ACIVS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4678. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74607-2_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74607-2_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74606-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74607-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics