Abstract
The paper is primarily concerned with laying out the space of positions that purport to account for semantic context sensitivity of natural language expressions and with making a prima facie case for relativism. I start with distinguishing between pre-semantic, semantic and post-semantic context sensitivity. In the following section I briefly present the classic picture of indexicals due to David Kaplan and assess some arguments for the introduction of certain parameters in the circumstances of evaluation (specifically, time). In section III I envisage two views that purport to expand semantic context sensitivity beyond expressions from “the basic set”: indexicalism and contextualism. In section IV, by means of an example taken from John Perry, I draw attention to a specific form of semantic context sensitivity, namely that in which what is affected by context are the circumstances of evaluation of utterances rather than their content. The example leads to the necessity of distinguishing between two roles of context: a content-determinative one and a circumstance-determinative one. In section V I introduce relativism as the view incorporating the claim that context has a circumstance-determinative role and contrast it with the two views presented before. In the final section I analyze a certain type of argument usually adduced in favor of contextualism (the so-called “context-shifting arguments”) and show that in order to work it has to rule out relativism. I conclude by claiming that the battle must be fought by giving arguments to the effect that a certain parameter should or should not be part of the circumstances of evaluation rather than the content of utterances.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cappelen, H., Lepore, E.: Insensitive Semantics. In: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford (2005)
Dreier, J.: Internalism and Speaker Relativism. Ethics 101, 6–26 (1990)
Egan, A., Hawthorne, J., Weatherson, B.: Epistemic Modals in Context. In: Preyer, G., Peter, G. (eds.) Contextualism in Philosophy. Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth, pp. 131–170. Clarendon Press, Oxford (2005)
Harman, G.: Moral Relativism. In: Harman, G., Thomson, J.J. (eds.) Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity, pp. 1–64. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (1996)
Kaplan, D.: Demonstratives. In: Almog, J., Perry, J., Wettstein, H. (eds.) Themes from Kaplan, pp. 481–563. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)
King, J.: Time, Modality and Semantic Values. Philosophical Perspectives 17, 195–245 (2003)
Kölbel, M.: Indexical Relativism versus Genuine Relativism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12, 297–313 (2004)
Lasersohn, P.: Context Dependence, Disagreement and Predicates of Personal Taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28, 643–686 (2005)
Lewis, D.: Index, Context, and Content. In: Lewis, D. (ed.) Papers in Philosophical Logic, pp. 21–44. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
MacFarlane, J.: Future Contingents and Relative Truth. The Philosophical Quarterly 53, 321–336 (2003)
MacFarlane, J.: The Assessment Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions. In: Gendler-Zsabo, T., Hawthorne, J. (eds.) Oxford Studies in Epistemology, pp. 197–223 (2005)
MacFarlane, J., (ms.): Non-indexical Contextualism, retrievable at http://sophos.berkeley.edu/macfarlane/nonindexical-contextualism.pdf
Marvan, T.: Obstacles to the Relativity of Truth. Organon F XIII(4), 439–450 (2006)
Perry, J.: Thought without Representation. In: Perry, J. (ed.) The Essential Indexical and Other Essays, pp. 205–219. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford (1993)
Perry, J.: Indexicals, Contexts and Unarticulated Constituents. In: Proceedings of the 1995 CSLI-Amsterdam Logic, Language and Computation Conference, pp. 1–16. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1998)
Recanati, F.: Literal Meaning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
Recanati, F.: Moderate Relativism. In: Garcia-Carpintero, M., Kölbel, M. (eds.) Relativizing Utterance Truth (forthcoming)
Recanati, F., (ms.): Perspectival Thought. A Plea for Moderate Relativism, retrievable at http://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/docs/00/09/48/48/PDF/RelativismBOOK69.pdf
Stanley, J.: Context and Logical Form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 391–434 (2000)
Stanley, J., Szabo, Z.: Quantifier Domain Restriction. Mind and Language 15, 219–261 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zeman, D. (2007). Context Sensitivity: Indexicalism, Contextualism, Relativism. In: Kokinov, B., Richardson, D.C., Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Vieu, L. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4635. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74255-5_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74255-5_41
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74254-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74255-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)