Skip to main content

A Brain MRI/SPECT Registration System Using an Adaptive Similarity Metric: Application on the Evaluation of Parkinson’s Disease

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 4418))

Abstract

Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) of dopamine transporters with 99mTc-TRODAT-1 has recently been proposed to provide valuable information of assessing the dopaminergic system. In order to measure the binding ratio of the nuclear medicine, registering magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and SPECT image is a significant process. Therefore, an automated MRI/SPECT image registration algorithm of using an adaptive similarity metric is proposed. This similarity metric combines anatomic features characterized by specific binding (SB), the mean counts per voxel within the specific tissues, of nuclear medicine and distribution of image intensity characterized by the Normalized Mutual Information (NMI). In addition, we have also built a computer-aid clinical diagnosis system which automates all the processes of MRI/SPECT registration for further evaluation of Parkinson’s disease. Clinical MRI/SPECT data from eighteen healthy subjects and thirteen patients are involved to validate the performance of the proposed system. Comparing with the conventional NMI-based registration algorithm, our system reduces the target of registration error (TRE) from >7 mm to approximate 4 mm. From the view point of clinical evaluation, the error of binding ratio, the ratio of specific-to-non-specific 99mTc-TRODAT-1 binding, is 0.20 in the healthy group and 0.13 in the patient group via the proposed system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pohjonen, H.K., et al.: Abdominal SPECT/MRI fusion applied to the study of splenic and hepatic uptake of radiolabeled thrombocytes and colloids. Ann. Nucl. Med. 10, 409–417 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Forster, G.J., et al.: SPET/CT image co-registration in the abdomen with a simple and cost-effective tool. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 30, 32–39 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Weng, Y.H., et al.: Sensitivity and specificity of 99mTc-TRODAT-1 SPECT imaging in differentiating patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease from healthy subjects. J. Nucl. Med. 45, 393–401 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grova, C., et al.: A methodology to validate MRI/SPECT registration methods using realistic simulated SPECT data. In: Niessen, W.J., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2001. LNCS, vol. 2208, pp. 275–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yokoi, T., et al.: Accuracy and reproducibility of co-registration techniques based on mutual information and normalized mutual information for MRI and SPECT brain images. Ann. Nucl. Med. 18, 659–667 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thurfjell, L., et al.: Improved efficiency for MR-SPET registration based on mutual information. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 27, 847–856 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu, Y.M., Cochoff, S.M.: Influence of implementation parameters on registration of MR and SPECT brain images by maximization of mutual information. J. Nucl. Med. 43, 160–166 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maes, F., et al.: Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 16, 187–198 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pluim, J.P.W., Maintz, J.B.A., Viergever, M.A.: Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22, 986–1004 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Studholme, C., Hill, D.L.G., Hawkes, D.J.: An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recognition 32, 71–86 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Periaswamy, S., Farid, H.: Elastic registration in the presence of intensity variations. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 22, 865–874 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Collins, D.L., et al.: Automatic 3D model-based neuroanatomical segmentation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 3, 190–208 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pfluger, T., et al.: Quantitative comparison of automatic and interactive methods for MRI-SPECT image registration of the brain based on 3-Dimensional calculation of error. J. Nucl. Med. 41, 1823–1829 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Press, W.H., et al.: Numerical Recipes in C++, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

André Gagalowicz Wilfried Philips

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, JD., Huang, CH., Chen, CW., Weng, YH., Lin, KJ., Chen, CT. (2007). A Brain MRI/SPECT Registration System Using an Adaptive Similarity Metric: Application on the Evaluation of Parkinson’s Disease. In: Gagalowicz, A., Philips, W. (eds) Computer Vision/Computer Graphics Collaboration Techniques. MIRAGE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4418. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71457-6_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71457-6_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71456-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71457-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics