Abstract
We investigate the problem of automatically repairing inconsistent ontologies. A repair is triggered when a contradiction is detected between the current theory and new experimental evidence. We are working in the domain of physics because it has good historical records of such contradictions and how they were resolved. We use these records to both develop and evaluate our techniques. To deal with problems of inferential search control and ambiguity in the atomic repair operations, we have developed ontology repair plans, which represent common patterns of repair. They first diagnose the inconsistency and then direct the resulting repair. Two such plans have been developed to repair ontologies that disagree over the value and the dependence of a function, respectively. We have implemented the repair plans in the galileo system and successfully evaluated galileo on a diverse range of examples from the history of physics.
The research reported in this paper was supported by EPSRC grant EP/E005713/1.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bundy, A., McNeill, F.: Representation as a fluent: An AI challenge for the next half century. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3), 85–87 (2006)
McNeill, F., Bundy, A.: Dynamic, automatic, first-order ontology repair by diagnosis of failed plan execution. IJSWIS, Special issue on ontology matching 3(3), 1–35 (2007)
Bundy, A.: Where’s my stuff? An ontology repair plan. In: Ahrendt, W., Baumgartner, P., de Nivelle, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Disproving - Non-Theorems, Non-Validity, Non-Provability, Bremen, Germany, July 2007, pp. 2–12 (2007), http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~ahrendt/CADE07-ws-disproving/
Miller, D., Nadathur, G.: An overview of λProlog. In: Bowen, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Logic Programming Conference/ Fifth Symposium on Logic Programming. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)
Bundy, A.: A science of reasoning. In: Lassez, J.L., Plotkin, G. (eds.) Computational Logic: Essays in Honor of Alan Robinson, pp. 178–198. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)
Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Grau, B.: Repairing Unsatisfiable Concepts in OWL Ontologies. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 170–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Wiser, M., Carey, S.: When heat and temperature were one. In: Stevens, A., Gentner, D. (eds.) Mental Models, pp. 267–297. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1983)
Rubin, V.C., Thonnard, N., Ford, W.K.J.: Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 /R = 4kpc/ to UGC 2885 /R = 122 kpc/. Astrophysical Journal 238, 471 (1980)
Langley, P., Zytkow, J., Simon, H., Bradshaw, G.: Mechanisms for qualitative and quantitative discovery. In: Michalski, R.S. (ed.) Proceedings of the International Machine Learning Workshop, University of Illinois, June 1983, pp. 121–132 (1983)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bundy, A., Chan, M. (2008). Towards Ontology Evolution in Physics. In: Hodges, W., de Queiroz, R. (eds) Logic, Language, Information and Computation. WoLLIC 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5110. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69937-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69937-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69936-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69937-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)