Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

NLP in OTF Computing: Current Approaches and Open Challenges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Software Technologies (ICIST 2018)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 920))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

On-The-Fly Computing is the vision of covering software needs of end users by fully-automatic compositions of existing software services. End users will receive so-called service compositions tailored to their very individual needs, based on natural language software descriptions. This everyday language may contain inaccuracies and incompleteness, which are well-known challenges in requirements engineering. In addition to existing approaches that try to automatically identify and correct these deficits, there are also new trends to involve users more in the elaboration and refinement process. In this paper, we present the relevant state of the art in the field of automated detection and compensation of multiple inaccuracies in natural language service descriptions and name open challenges needed to be tackled in NL-based software service composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See https://sfb901.upb.de for more information about OTF Computing.

  2. 2.

    This understanding of ambiguity is often summarized in literature as “vagueness”.

  3. 3.

    Visit https://www.nltk.org for more information.

References

  1. Bajwa, I.S., Lee, M., Bordbar, B.: Resolving syntactic ambiguities in natural language specification of constraints. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2012. LNCS, vol. 7181, pp. 178–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28604-9_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bano, M.: Addressing the challenges of requirements ambiguity: a review of empirical literature. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on EmpiRE, pp. 21–24. IEEE, Ottawa, August 2015

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bäumer, F.S.: Indikatorbasierte Erkennung und Kompensation von ungenauen und unvollständig beschriebenen Softwareanforderungen. Ph.D. thesis, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany, July 2017. ISBN: 978-3-942647-91-5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bäumer, F.S., Dollmann, M., Geierhos, M.: Studying software descriptions in SourceForge and app stores for a better understanding of real-life requirements. In: Sarro, F., Shihab, E., Nagappan, M., Platenius, M.C., Kaimann, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on App Market Analytics, pp. 19–25. ACM, Paderborn, September 2017

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bäumer, F.S., Geierhos, M.: Flexible ambiguity resolution and incompleteness detection in requirements descriptions via an indicator-based configuration of text analysis pipelines. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, Waikoloa Village, USA, pp. 5746–5755 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bucchiarone, A., Gnesi, S., Fantechi, A., Trentanni, G.: An experience in using a tool for evaluating a large set of natural language requirements. In: Proceedings ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2010, pp. 281–286. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caron, M., Bäumer, F.S., Geierhos, M.: Back to basics: extracting software requirements with a syntactic approach. In: Schmid, K., et al. (eds.) Joint Proceedings of REFSQ-2018 Workshops, Doctoral Symposium, Live Studies Track, and Poster Track Co-located with the 23rd International Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2018). CEUR-WS.org (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dollmann. M.: Frag die Anwender: Extraktion und Klassifikation von funktionalen Anforderungen aus User-Generated-Content. Master thesis, University of Paderborn, Paderborn, Germany, March 2016

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dollmann, M., Geierhos, M.: On- and off-topic classification and semantic annotation of user-generated software requirements. In: Proceedings of the Conference on EMNLP. ACL, Austin, November 2016

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fabbrini, F., Fusani, M., Gnesi, S., Lami, G.: The linguistic approach to the natural language requirements quality: benefit of the use of an automatic tool. In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual NASA Goddard Software Engineering Workshop, pp. 97–105. IEEE, Greenbelt, November 2001

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrari, A., dell’Orletta, F., Spagnolo, G.O., Gnesi, S.: Measuring and improving the completeness of natural language requirements. In: Salinesi, C., van de Weerd, I. (eds.) REFSQ 2014. LNCS, vol. 8396, pp. 23–38. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05843-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Firesmith, D.: Common requirements problems, their negative consequences, and the industry best practices to help solve them. J. Object Technol. 6(1), 17–33 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Friesen, E., Bäumer, F.S., Geierhos, M.: CORDULA: software requirements extraction utilizing chatbot as communication interface. In: Schmid, K., et al. (eds.) Joint Proceedings of REFSQ-2018 Workshops, Doctoral Symposium, Live Studies Track, and Poster Track Co-located with the 23rd International Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2018). CEUR-WS.org (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geierhos, M., Bäumer, F.S.: How to complete customer requirements: using concept expansion for requirement refinement. In: Métais, E., Meziane, F., Saraee, M., Sugumaran, V., Vadera, S. (eds.) NLDB 2016. LNCS, vol. 9612, pp. 37–47. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41754-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Geierhos, M., Schulze, S., Bäumer, F.S.: What did you mean? Facing the challenges of user-generated software requirements. In: Loiseau, S., Filipe, J., Duval, B., van den Herik, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th ICAART, Special Session on PUaNLP 2015, pp. 277–283. SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lissabon (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huertas, C., Juárez-Ramírez, R.: NLARE, a natural language processing tool for automatic requirements evaluation. In: Proceedings of the CUBE International Information Technology Conference, CUBE 2012, pp. 371–378. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huertas, C., Juárez-Ramírez, R.: Towards assessing the quality of functional requirements using English/Spanish controlled languages and context free grammar. In: Proceedings of the 3rd DICTAP, pp. 234–241. SDIWC, Ostrava, July 2013

    Google Scholar 

  18. Husain, S., Beg, R.: Advances in ambiguity less NL SRS: a review. In: Proceedings of ICETECH 2015, pp. 221–225. IEEE, Coimbatore, March 2015

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kamsties, E.: Understanding ambiguity in requirements engineering. In: Aurum, A., Wohlin, C. (eds.) Engineering and Managing Software Requirements, pp. 245–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28244-0_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamsties, E., Berry, D.M., Paech, B.: Detecting ambiguities in requirements documents using inspections. In: Proceedings of 1st WISE, Paris, France, pp. 68–80 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kamsties, E., Paech, B.: Taming ambiguity in natural language requirements. In: Proceedings of the 13th ICSOFT-EA, Paris, France, pp. 1–8, December 2000

    Google Scholar 

  22. Körner, S.J.: RECAA - Werkzeugunterstützung in der Anforderungserhebung. Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie. KIT Scientific Publishing, Karlsruhe, February 2014

    Google Scholar 

  23. Körner, S.J., Brumm, T.: Natural language specification improvement with ontologies. Int. J. Semant. Comput. 03(04), 445–470 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lami, G.: QuARS: a tool for analyzing requirements. Technical report ESC- TR-2005-014, Carnegie Mellon University, September 2005

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moens, M.-F., Li, J., Chua, T.-S.: Mining User Generated Content. CRC Press, Leuven/Beijing/Singapore (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Navigli, R., Ponzetto, S.P.: BabelNet: the automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network. In: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 193, pp. 217–250. Elsevier, Essex, December 2012

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Navigli, R., Ponzetto, S.P.: Joining forces pays off: multilingual joint word sense disambiguation. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on EMNLP and CONLL, pp. 1399–1410. ACL, Jeju (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pekar, V., Felderer, M., Breu, R.: Improvement methods for software requirement specifications: a mapping study. In: Proceedings of the 9th QUATIC, pp. 242–245. IEEE, Guimarães, September 2014

    Google Scholar 

  29. Platenius, M.C. et al.: An Overview of Service Specification Language and Matching in On-The-Fly Computing (v0.3). Technical report Tr-ri-16-349, Software Engineering Group, Heinz Nixdorf Institut, University of Paderborn, Germany, January 2016

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shah, U.S., Jinwala, D.C.: Resolving ambiguities in natural language software requirements: a comprehensive survey. SIGSOFT 40(5), 1–7 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tichy, W.F., Landhäußer, M., Körner, S.J.: nlrpBENCH: a benchmark for natural language requirements processing. In: MK Software Engineering and Management (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tjong, S.F., Berry, D.M.: The design of SREE – a prototype potential ambiguity finder for requirements specifications and lessons learned. In: Doerr, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) REFSQ 2013. LNCS, vol. 7830, pp. 80–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37422-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Umber, A., Bajwa, I.S.: Minimizing ambiguity in natural language software requirements specification. In: Proceedings of the 6th ICDIM, pp. 102–107. IEEE, Melbourn, September 2011

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vlas, R., Robinson, W.N.: A rule-based natural language technique for requirements discovery and classification in open-source software development projects. In: Proceedings of the 44th HICSS, pp. 1–10. IEEE, Kauai (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center “On-The-Fly Computing” (SFB 901). Furthermore, we thank our student assistant Edwin Friesen for his contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Paderborn University, Paderborn, Germany

    Frederik S. Bäumer & Michaela Geierhos

Authors
  1. Frederik S. Bäumer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michaela Geierhos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederik S. Bäumer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania

    Robertas Damaševičius

  2. Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania

    GiedrÄ— VasiljevienÄ—

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bäumer, F.S., Geierhos, M. (2018). NLP in OTF Computing: Current Approaches and Open Challenges. In: Damaševičius, R., Vasiljevienė, G. (eds) Information and Software Technologies. ICIST 2018. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 920. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99972-2_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99972-2_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99971-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99972-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation