Skip to main content

Design of a Knowledge-Base Strategy for Capability-Aware Treatment of Uncertainties of Automated Driving Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11094))

Abstract

Automated Driving Systems (ADS) represent a key technological advancement in the area of Cyber-physical systems (CPS) and Embedded Control Systems (ECS) with the aim of promoting traffic safety and environmental sustainability. The operation of ADS however exhibits several uncertainties that if improperly treated in development and operation would lead to safety and performance related problems. This paper presents the design of a knowledge-base (KB) strategy for a systematic treatment of such uncertainties and their system-wide implications on design-space and state-space. In the context of this approach, we use the term Knowledge-Base (KB) to refer to the model that stipulates the fundamental facts of a CPS in regard to the overall system operational states, action sequences, as well as the related costs or constraint factors. The model constitutes a formal basis for describing, communicating and inferring particular operational truths as well as the belief and knowledge representing the awareness or comprehension of such truths. For the reasoning of ADS behaviors and safety risks, each system operational state is explicitly formulated as a conjunction of environmental state and some collective states showing the ADS capabilities for perception, control and actuations. Uncertainty Models (UM) are associated as attributes to such state definitions for describing and quantifying the corresponding belief or knowledge status due to the presences of evidences about system performance and deficiencies, etc. On a broader perspective, the approach is part of our research on bridging the gaps among intelligent functions, system capability and dependability for mission-&safety-critical CPS, through a combination of development- and run-time measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. EC. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/its_en. Accessed 28 May 2018

  2. SAE International: SAE J3016: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for on-Road Motor Vehicle (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frederick, H.-R., Waterman, D., Lenat, D.: Building Expert Systems. Addison-Wesley (1983). ISBN 0-201-10686-8

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, D., Lu, Z.: A methodological framework for model-based self-management of services and components in dependable cyber-physical systems. In: Zamojski, W., Mazurkiewicz, J., Sugier, J., Walkowiak, T., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2017. AISC, vol. 582, pp. 97–105. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59415-6_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Kolagari, R., et al.: Model-based analysis and engineering of automotive architectures with EAST-ADL: revisited. Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl. (IJCSSA) 3(2), 25–70 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johansson, R., et al.: A strategy for assessing safe use of sensors in autonomous road vehicles. In: Tonetta, S., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10488, pp. 149–161. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66266-4_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Miyajima, C., et al.: Analyzing driver gaze behavior and consistency of decision making during automated driving. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, August 2015 (Iv) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michon, J.A.: A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do? In: Human Behavior and Traffic Safety. Plenum (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Albus, J.S., Proctor, F.G.: A reference model architecture for intelligent hybrid control systems. In: Proceedings of the IFAC, San Francisco, CA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cimatti, A., et al.: NUSMV a new symbolic model checker. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. 2(4), 410–425 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. der Kiureghian, A., Ditlevsen, O.: Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Struct. Saf. 31(2), 105–112 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hermann, G.M.: Quantifying uncertainty: modern computational representation of probability and applications, extreme man-made and natural hazards in dynamics of structures. In: NATO Security through Science Series, 2007, pp. 105–135 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, M., et al.: Understanding uncertainty in cyber-physical systems: a conceptual model. In: Wąsowski, A., Lönn, H. (eds.) ECMFA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9764, pp. 247–264. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42061-5_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. SysML. OMG Systems Modeling Language (OMG SysML™), OMG

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feiler, P.H., Gluch, D.P.: Model-Based Engineering with AADL: An Introduction to the SAE Architecture Analysis & Design Language. Addison-Wesley (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mackay, D.J.C.: Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003). ISBN 0-521-64298-1

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Aven, T., et al.: Uncertainty in Risk Assessment: The Representation and Treatment of Uncertainties by Probabilistic and Non-Probabilistic Methods. Wiley (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meedeniya, I., et al.: Evaluating probabilistic models with uncertain model parameters. Softw. Syst. Model. 13(4), 1395–1415 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ying, J., et al.: A hidden Markov model-based algorithm for fault diagnosis with partial and imperfect tests. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Part C 30(4), 463–473 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, X., Gu, C., Lin, J.: Support vector machines for anomaly detection. In: Intelligent Control and Automation, 2006, IEEE 6th World Congress on WCICA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research has been supported by the Swedish government agency for innovation systems (VINNOVA) in the ESPLANADE project (ref 2016-04268).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to DeJiu Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, D., Östberg, K., Becker, M., Sivencrona, H., Warg, F. (2018). Design of a Knowledge-Base Strategy for Capability-Aware Treatment of Uncertainties of Automated Driving Systems. In: Gallina, B., Skavhaug, A., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11094. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99229-7_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99229-7_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99228-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99229-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics