Skip to main content

Creativity as a Dynamic, Personal, Parsimonious Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity

Part of the book series: Creativity Theory and Action in Education ((CTAE,volume 4))

Abstract

This entire volume is intended to challenge static conceptions of creative action and thought. The present chapter introduces a particular dynamic definition of creativity. It also explores applications of that definition, primarily for education. The definition detailed herein is only one of several, as is evidenced by the other chapters in this same volume, and it may be that there is overlap. There may also be disagreement, the exploration of which will no doubt lead to further refinements and advance in our understanding of creativity. For obvious reasons the present chapter begins with a brief summary of previous definitions of creativity. The new dynamic definition will make the most sense after this summary (also see Corazza, GE. Creativity Research Journal, 28:258–267 (2016)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acar, S., Burnett, C., & Cabra, J. F. (2017). Ingredients of creativity: Originality and more. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. (1980). The social animal. New York: Worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190–212). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaveanu, V. P. (2010). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 311–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharkhurin, A. (2014). Creativity.4in1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 338–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L., & Wilson, N. (2017). Defining creativity with discovery. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1968). Creativity in self actualizing people. In Toward a psychology of being (pp. 135–145). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1976). To understand is to invent. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1954). Towards a theory of creativity. ETC: A Review of General Semantics, 11, 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1989). The creativity of children’s art. Child Study Journal, 19, 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1995). Insight for creativity, expression for impact. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72(Summer), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1997). Personal creativity: Lessons from literary criticism. In L. Dorfman & C. Martindale (Eds.), Emotion, creativity and art (Vol. 1, pp. 305–317). Perm: Perm State Institute of Arts and Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1999). Creativity need not be social. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 237–264). Cresskill: Hampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Education, 47, 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2008). Creativity and education. New Horizons in Education, 56(1), 107–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2010). Education based on a parsimonious theory of creativity. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 235–251). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Pina, J. (2013). Imagination and personal creativity. In M. Taylor (Ed.), Oxford handbook of the development of imagination (pp. 379–386). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., Kaufman, J. C., Halliday, L. R., & Cole, J. C. (2010). Change in reputation as index of genius and eminence. Historical Methods, 43, 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., Acar, S., Kaufman, J. C., & Halliday, L. R. (2016). Changes in reputation and associations with fame and biographical data. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1, 52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1995). Exceptional personal influence: An integrative paradigm. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2016). Creativity and confucius. Journal of Genius and Eminence, 1, 84–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. (2015). On the usefulness of “value” in the definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Runco, M.A. (2019). Creativity as a Dynamic, Personal, Parsimonious Process. In: Beghetto, R.A., Corazza, G.E. (eds) Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99162-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99163-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics