Skip to main content

“How Are We Doing?” Using a Maturity Model Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Fostering Creativity and Innovation

Abstract

This chapter focuses on assisting organizations with evaluating their innovation deployment and charting a path forward. We introduce a Creativity and Innovation Assessment Maturity (CIAM) tool. The four major components discussed in the previous chapter make up the important elements of the model, which recognizes three levels of achievement, or maturity. The CIAM tool can be used to assess innovation from grassroots efforts with ad hoc projects to world-class deployment. The chapter provides advice on how organizations can use this structured model to address critical questions such as:

  • Do we have the right pieces in place to innovate?

  • Is anything missing in our innovation deployment?

  • What are we doing well in terms of innovation levers?

  • What are our challenges for our innovation deployment?

  • What is most important for us to work on for the next level of maturity?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, R., J. Bessant, and R. Phelps. 2006. Innovation Management Measurement: A Review. International Journal of Management Reviews 8 (1): 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozijnsen, A.J., and W.J. Vrakking. 2013. Veranderkunde (“Change Management”). Deventer: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Bassiti, L., and R. Ajhoun. 2016. Towards Innovation Excellence: Why and How to Measure Innovation Performance? In Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M), 2016 6th International Conference, pp. 99–104. IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerka, F., B. Kriegesmann, and M.G. Schwering. 2009. Evaluating Innovation Ideas: A Comprehensive Approach to New Product Development. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning 5 (2): 118–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. 2011. The Innovation Master Plan: The CEO’s Guide to Innovation. Walnut Creek: Innovation Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A., L. Välikangas, and P. Merlyn. 2005. Metrics for Innovation: Guidelines for Developing a Customized Suite of Innovation Metrics. Strategy & Leadership 33 (1): 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2015. Better Life Index. http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/. Accessed 8 Sept 2015.

  • Weick, K.E., and R.E. Quinn. 1999. Organizational Change and Development. Annual Review of Psychology 50 (1): 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Flevy Lasrado .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lasrado, F. (2019). “How Are We Doing?” Using a Maturity Model Assessment. In: Fostering Creativity and Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99121-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics