Abstract
Where there is conflict between groups, members argue with each other over the correct course of action. While some advocate increased violence or separation between the groups, others argue for peace, tolerance, or interdependence. Advocates of violence or separation engage in discursive strategies to discredit these ingroup opponents, in which they claim to represent the true interests and spirit of the group while their opponents are dismissed are selfish, disloyal, subservient, weak, or ignorant. Methods of discrediting opponents act as a form of social pressure, defining a set of social norms, punishing dissenters, and warning others against publicly adopting opposing positions. This chapter examines the discursive practices used to discredit opponents in a range of current and historical conflict situations. A distinction will be drawn between ‘mild’ and ‘strong’ discrediting practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Thanks to Ruaridh McDermott for finding these three SNP extracts.
- 2.
At the time of writing, the NRA website claimed nearly five million members in the USA although this figure is disputed.
References
ABC News. (2016). From ‘Crooked Hillary’ to ‘Little Marco’, Donald Trump’s many nicknames. Retrieved May 11, 2016, from http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/crooked-hillary-marco-donald-trumps-nicknames/story?id=39035114
Barnes, L. (2005). The Islamic Manchurian candidates. Retrieved 15/07/2005 from www.bnp.org.uk
Bar-Tal, D. (1997). The monopolization of patriotism. In D. Bar-Tal & E. Staub (Eds.), Patriotism in the lives of individuals and nations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Bar-Tal, D., Halperin, E., & Oren, N. (2010). Socio–psychological barriers to peace making: The case of the Israeli Jewish society. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4, 63–109.
Berkeley, B. (2001). The graves are not yet full: Race, tribe and power in the heart of America. New York: Basic Books.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London: Sage
Bump, P. (2017). The head of the NRA defines his new enemies: The ‘violent left’ and judges who ‘do violence’ to the Constitution. The Washington Post, Feb 24.
Burleigh, M., & Wippermann, W. (1991). The racial state: Germany 1933-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Condor, S. (1996). Social identity and time. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Condor, S. (2006). Public prejudice as collaborative accomplishment: Towards a dialogic social psychology of racism. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 1–18.
Copsey, N. (2004). Contemporary British Fascism: The British National Party and the quest for legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Finlay, W. M. L. (2005). Pathologizing dissent: Identity politics, Zionism and the ‘self-hating Jew’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 1–23.
Finlay, W. M. L. (2007). The propaganda of extreme hostility: Denunciation and the regulation of the group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 323–341.
Finlay, W. M. L. (2014). Denunciation and the construction of norms in group conflict: Examples from an Al-Qaeda-supporting group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 691–710.
Finlay, W. M. L. (2018). Language and civilian deaths: Denying responsibility for casualties in the Gaza conflict 2014. Political Psychology, 39, 595–609.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191.
Gellately, R. (1990). The Gestapo and German society: Enforcing racial policy, 1933-1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Goebbels, J. (1941). Die Juden sind schuld! (The Jews are guilty!). Das eherne Herz (pp. 85–91). Retrieved 27/11/2005 from the German Propapaganda Archive web-site: http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goeb1.htm
Hodges, A. (2013). Introduction. In A. Hodges (Ed.), Discourses of war and peace (pp. 3–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopkins, N., & Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2006). Minority group members’ theories of intergroup contact: A case study of British Muslims’ conceptualizations of ‘Islamophobia’ and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 245–264.
Hopkins, N., Kahani-Hopkins, V., & Reicher, S. (2006). Identity and social change: Contextualizing agency. Feminism & Psychology, 16, 52–57.
Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., & Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2003). Citizenship, participation and identity construction: Political mobilization amongst British Muslims. Psychologica Belgica, 43, 33–54.
Lazar, A., & Lazar, M. M. (2004). The discourse of the New World Order: ‘Out-casting’ the double face of threat. Discourse & Society, 15, 223–242.
Leudar, I., Marsland, V., & Nekvapil, J. (2004). On membership categorization: ‘Us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse and Society, 15, 243–266.
McKinlay, A., McVittie, C., & Sambaraju, R. (2012). ‘This is ordinary behaviour’: Categorization and culpability in Hamas leaders’ accounts of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 534–550.
Oddo, J. (2011). War legitimation discourse: Representing ‘us’ and ‘them’ in four US presidential addresses. Discourse & Society, 22, 287–314.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rapley, M. (1998). ‘Just an ordinary Australian’: Self-categorization and the discursive construction of facticity in ‘new racist’ political rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 325–344.
Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Rath, R. (2008). Making a virtue of evil: A five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1313–1344.
Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Self and nation. London: Sage.
Reicher, S., Hopkins, N., & Condor, S. (1997). Stereotype construction as a strategy of influence. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rooyackers, I. N., & Verkuyten, M. (2012). Mobilizing support for the extreme right: A discursive analysis of minority leadership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 130–148.
Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (1998). When consensus fails: An analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party (1991). European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 623–645.
Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (2000). Contested identities and schisms in groups: Opposing the ordination of women as priests in the Church of England. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 95–112.
Salmond, A. (2010). Speech to the SNP Conference. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-11560698
Salmond, A. (2012). Speech to the SNP Conference. Retrieved from http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13077771.In_full__Alex_Salmond_s_speech_to_SNP_conference/
Sharon, A. (1994, March 11). A reality that speaks for itself. Jerusalem Post, p. A4.
Shirlow, P. (2003). ‘Who fears to speak’: Fear, mobility and ethno-sectarianism in the two ‘Ardoynes’. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 3, 76–91.
Sturgeon, N. (2012). Speech to SNP Conference. Retrieved from http://www.ukpol.co.uk/nicola-sturgeon-2012-speech-to-snp-party-conference/
van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wood, C., & Finlay, W. M. L. (2008). British National Party representations of Muslims in the month after the London bombings: Homogeneity, threat, and the conspiracy tradition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 707–726.
Yildiz, A. A., & Verkuyten, M. (2012). Conceptualising Euro-Islam: Managing the societal demand for religious reform. Identities, 19(3), 360–376.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Finlay, W.M.L. (2018). Disloyal, Deluded, Dangerous: How Supporters of Violence or Separatism Discredit Their Political Opponents. In: Gibson, S. (eds) Discourse, Peace, and Conflict. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99093-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99094-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)