Skip to main content

Disloyal, Deluded, Dangerous: How Supporters of Violence or Separatism Discredit Their Political Opponents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Discourse, Peace, and Conflict

Part of the book series: Peace Psychology Book Series ((PPBS))

  • 928 Accesses

Abstract

Where there is conflict between groups, members argue with each other over the correct course of action. While some advocate increased violence or separation between the groups, others argue for peace, tolerance, or interdependence. Advocates of violence or separation engage in discursive strategies to discredit these ingroup opponents, in which they claim to represent the true interests and spirit of the group while their opponents are dismissed are selfish, disloyal, subservient, weak, or ignorant. Methods of discrediting opponents act as a form of social pressure, defining a set of social norms, punishing dissenters, and warning others against publicly adopting opposing positions. This chapter examines the discursive practices used to discredit opponents in a range of current and historical conflict situations. A distinction will be drawn between ‘mild’ and ‘strong’ discrediting practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thanks to Ruaridh McDermott for finding these three SNP extracts.

  2. 2.

    At the time of writing, the NRA website claimed nearly five million members in the USA although this figure is disputed.

References

  • ABC News. (2016). From ‘Crooked Hillary’ to ‘Little Marco’, Donald Trump’s many nicknames. Retrieved May 11, 2016, from http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/crooked-hillary-marco-donald-trumps-nicknames/story?id=39035114

  • Barnes, L. (2005). The Islamic Manchurian candidates. Retrieved 15/07/2005 from www.bnp.org.uk

  • Bar-Tal, D. (1997). The monopolization of patriotism. In D. Bar-Tal & E. Staub (Eds.), Patriotism in the lives of individuals and nations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., Halperin, E., & Oren, N. (2010). Socio–psychological barriers to peace making: The case of the Israeli Jewish society. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4, 63–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, B. (2001). The graves are not yet full: Race, tribe and power in the heart of America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Bump, P. (2017). The head of the NRA defines his new enemies: The ‘violent left’ and judges who ‘do violence’ to the Constitution. The Washington Post, Feb 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleigh, M., & Wippermann, W. (1991). The racial state: Germany 1933-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condor, S. (1996). Social identity and time. In W. P. Robinson (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condor, S. (2006). Public prejudice as collaborative accomplishment: Towards a dialogic social psychology of racism. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copsey, N. (2004). Contemporary British Fascism: The British National Party and the quest for legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, W. M. L. (2005). Pathologizing dissent: Identity politics, Zionism and the ‘self-hating Jew’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, W. M. L. (2007). The propaganda of extreme hostility: Denunciation and the regulation of the group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, W. M. L. (2014). Denunciation and the construction of norms in group conflict: Examples from an Al-Qaeda-supporting group. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 691–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, W. M. L. (2018). Language and civilian deaths: Denying responsibility for casualties in the Gaza conflict 2014. Political Psychology, 39, 595–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gellately, R. (1990). The Gestapo and German society: Enforcing racial policy, 1933-1945. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goebbels, J. (1941). Die Juden sind schuld! (The Jews are guilty!). Das eherne Herz (pp. 85–91). Retrieved 27/11/2005 from the German Propapaganda Archive web-site: http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goeb1.htm

  • Hodges, A. (2013). Introduction. In A. Hodges (Ed.), Discourses of war and peace (pp. 3–22). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, N., & Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2006). Minority group members’ theories of intergroup contact: A case study of British Muslims’ conceptualizations of ‘Islamophobia’ and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, N., Kahani-Hopkins, V., & Reicher, S. (2006). Identity and social change: Contextualizing agency. Feminism & Psychology, 16, 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., & Kahani-Hopkins, V. (2003). Citizenship, participation and identity construction: Political mobilization amongst British Muslims. Psychologica Belgica, 43, 33–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, A., & Lazar, M. M. (2004). The discourse of the New World Order: ‘Out-casting’ the double face of threat. Discourse & Society, 15, 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leudar, I., Marsland, V., & Nekvapil, J. (2004). On membership categorization: ‘Us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse and Society, 15, 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, A., McVittie, C., & Sambaraju, R. (2012). ‘This is ordinary behaviour’: Categorization and culpability in Hamas leaders’ accounts of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 534–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oddo, J. (2011). War legitimation discourse: Representing ‘us’ and ‘them’ in four US presidential addresses. Discourse & Society, 22, 287–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapley, M. (1998). ‘Just an ordinary Australian’: Self-categorization and the discursive construction of facticity in ‘new racist’ political rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Rath, R. (2008). Making a virtue of evil: A five-step social identity model of the development of collective hate. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1313–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Self and nation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S., Hopkins, N., & Condor, S. (1997). Stereotype construction as a strategy of influence. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooyackers, I. N., & Verkuyten, M. (2012). Mobilizing support for the extreme right: A discursive analysis of minority leadership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 130–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (1998). When consensus fails: An analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party (1991). European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 623–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (2000). Contested identities and schisms in groups: Opposing the ordination of women as priests in the Church of England. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmond, A. (2010). Speech to the SNP Conference. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-11560698

  • Salmond, A. (2012). Speech to the SNP Conference. Retrieved from http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/13077771.In_full__Alex_Salmond_s_speech_to_SNP_conference/

  • Sharon, A. (1994, March 11). A reality that speaks for itself. Jerusalem Post, p. A4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirlow, P. (2003). ‘Who fears to speak’: Fear, mobility and ethno-sectarianism in the two ‘Ardoynes’. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 3, 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, N. (2012). Speech to SNP Conference. Retrieved from http://www.ukpol.co.uk/nicola-sturgeon-2012-speech-to-snp-party-conference/

  • van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C., & Finlay, W. M. L. (2008). British National Party representations of Muslims in the month after the London bombings: Homogeneity, threat, and the conspiracy tradition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(4), 707–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildiz, A. A., & Verkuyten, M. (2012). Conceptualising Euro-Islam: Managing the societal demand for religious reform. Identities, 19(3), 360–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Mick L. Finlay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Finlay, W.M.L. (2018). Disloyal, Deluded, Dangerous: How Supporters of Violence or Separatism Discredit Their Political Opponents. In: Gibson, S. (eds) Discourse, Peace, and Conflict. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics