Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Blockchain Adoption: Technological, Organisational and Environmental Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Transformation through Blockchain

Abstract

Information technology (IT) innovation is rapidly reshaping organisations, affecting fundamental aspects of their everyday business activities and processes. This development is accompanied by benefits as well as challenges. In this article, we focus on a specific distributed ledger IT called blockchain which has been heralded as possessing the capability to radically transform a multitude of industries. However, there is a dearth of research which has coalesced the important considerations that organisations should consider prior to adopting blockchain technologies. Consequently, using innovation theory, which has been extensively used to examine the adoption of IT in organisations, we identify salient technological, organisational and environmental (TOE) considerations which influence the adoption of blockchain by organisations. We anchor our discussion using the top three organisational considerations which emerged from our research: top management support, organisational readiness and organisational support. We also provide an overview of the blockchain concept and outline the advantages and potential use cases that organisations contemplating adopting the technology can leverage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). A theory of reasoned action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, C. P., & Sambamurthy, V. (1999). Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 304–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj, A. (2000). A study of senior information systems managers decision models in adopting new computing architectures. Journal of the AIS, 1(1es), paper 4, 1–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J., & Vargo, S. L. (2015). Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bear, K., Drury, N., Korsten, P., Pureswaran, V., Wallis, J., & Wagle, L. (2016). Blockchain rewires financial markets: Trailblazers take the lead. IBM Institute for Business Value. Retrieved from: https://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/gb/en/gbp03469usen/GBP03469USEN.PDF. Accessed 26 July 2017

  • Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2015). Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(2), 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Xu, B., Lu, M., & Chen, N. S. (2018). Exploring blockchain technology and its potential applications for education. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clohessy, T., Acton, T., & Morgan, L. (2017). The impact of cloud-based digital transformation on IT service providers: Evidence from focus groups. International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC), 7(4), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clohessy, T., Acton, T., Godfrey, R., & Houston, M. (2018, Forthcoming). The adoption of blockchain in Ireland: Examining the influence of organisational factors (A National University of Ireland Galway and Blockchain Association of Ireland Report).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, M., Nachiappan, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Applied Innovation Review, 1(2), 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organisational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F. (1992). Organisational size and innovation. Organisation studies, 13(3), 375–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, L., Neufeld, D., & Higgins, C. (2009). Top management support of enterprise systems implementations. Journal of Information Technology, 24(1), 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Extance, A. (2015). Bitcoin and beyond. Nature, 526(1), 21–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyal, I., & Sirer, E. G. (2013). Majority is not enough: Bitcoin mining is vulnerable. International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, pp. 436–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folkinshteyn, D., & Lennon, M. (2016). Braving bitcoin: A technology acceptance model (TAM) analysis. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 18(4), 220–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangwar, H., Date, H., & Ramaswamy, R. (2015). Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(1), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, J. Z. (2016). The real world of the decentralised autonomous society. tripleC; Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 14(1), 62–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google. (2018). Blockchain, Google trends. Retrieved from https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=2011-03-27%202018-03-27&q=blockchain. Accessed 27 Mar 2018.

  • Grandon, E. E., & Pearson, J. M. (2004). Electronic commerce adoption: An empirical study of small and medium US businesses. Information Management, 42(1), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinberg, R. (2011). Bitcoin: An innovative alternative digital currency. Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal, 4(1), 159–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Y., & Liang, C. (2016). Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry. Financial Innovation, 2(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, K. (2017). Blockchain for development-hope or hype? Institute for Development Studies, Rapid Response Briefing, 17, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about Blockchain. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/01/the-truth-about-blockchain. Accessed 5 July 2017.

  • Ito, J., Narula, N., & Ali, R. (2017). The blockchain will do to the financial system what the internet did to media. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017 /03/the-blockchain-will-do-to-banks-and-law-firms-what-the-internet-did-to-media?re ferral=03758&cm_vc=rr_item_page.top_right. Accessed 5 July 2017.

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Ives, B. (1991). Executive involvement and participation in the management of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 15, 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazeem, Y. (2018). The world’s first blockchain-supported elections just happened in Sierra Leone. Retrieved from https://qz.com/1227050/sierra-leone-elections-powered-by-blockchain/. Accessed 29 Mar 2018.

  • Kiayias, A., & Panagiotakos, G. (2016). On trees, chains and fast transactions in the blockchain. IACR Cryptology, ePrint Archive, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organisational innovation: The influence of individual, organisational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, S., & Nadal, S. (2012, August 1–19). PPCoin: Peer-to-peer crypto-currency with proof-of-stake (Self-published paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchenham, B., & Brereton, P. (2013). A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 55(12), 2049–2075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiviat, T. I. (2015). Beyond bitcoin: Issues in regulating blockchain transactions. Duke LJ, 23(November), 569–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosba, A., Miller, A., Shi, E., Wen, Z., & Papamanthou, C. (2016). Hawk: The blockchain model of cryptography and privacy-preserving smart contracts. In M. Locasto & K. Butler (Chairs), 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (pp. 839–858), The Fairmont, San Jose, California, 23–25 May, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2016.55. Accessed 4 July 2017.

  • Kulkarni, U. R., Robles-Flores, J. A., & Popovič, A. (2017). Business intelligence capability: The effect of top management and the mediating roles of user participation and analytical decision-making orientation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18(7), 516–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995). Electronic data interchange and small organisations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly, 19(14), 465–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review, 95(1), 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G., & Xia, W. (2006). Organisational size and IT innovation adoption: A meta-analysis. Information Management, 43(8), 975–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindman, J., Tuunainen, V. K., & Rossi, M. (2017). Opportunities and risks of blockchain technologies–A research agenda. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippert, S. K., & Govindarajulu, C. (2006). Technological, organisational, and environmental antecedents to web services adoption. Communications of the IIMA, 6(1), 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey. (2017). Blockchain technology in the insurance industry. Retrieved from https://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/fio/Documents/McKinsey_FACI_Blockchain_in_Insurance.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2017.

  • Mehta, D., & Striapunia, K. (2017). FinTech 2017, market size, business models, blockchain and company profiles (Statista report). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/study/45600/statista-report-fintech/. Accessed 5 Aug 2017.

  • Mendling, J., Weber, I., van der Aalst, W., Brocke, J. V., Cabanillas, C., Daniel, F., et al. (2017). Blockchains for business process management-challenges and opportunities. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.03610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molla, A., & Licker, P. S. (2005). Perceived e-readiness factors in e-commerce adoption: An empirical investigation in a developing country. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 83–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morabito, V. (2017). Blockchain value system. In Business innovation through Blockchain. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin; a peer-to-peer electronic cash system (Self-published paper), pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nofer, M., Gomber, P., Hinz, O., & Schiereck, D. (2017). Blockchain. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 59(3), 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dair, M., Beaven, Z., Neilson, D., Osborne, R., & Pacifico, P. (2016). Music on the blockchain (Blockchain for creative industries research cluster report, pp. 1–29). Middlesex University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Önder, I., & Treiblmaier, H. (2018). Blockchain and tourism: Three research propositions. Annals of Tourism Research, 72(C), 180–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, F. S. (2017). Bitcoin and the blockchain as possible corporate governance tools: Strengths and weaknesses. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs, 5(2), 262–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, M. (2015). Blockchain technology: Principles and applications. Research Handbook on Digital Transformations (pp. 225–253). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784717766.00019. Accessed 5 July 2017.

  • Pilkington, M. (2016). Chapter 11. Blockchain technology: Principles and applications. In Research handbook on digital transformations (p. 225). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, F., & Harrigan, M. (2012). An analysis of anonymity in the bitcoin system. In A. Pentland, J. Clippinger, & L. Sweeney (Chairs), 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk & Trust/2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing, MIT Media Lab, Boston, Massachusetts, 9–11 October, IEEE, Washington DC, 1318–1236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, C., Kraus, S., & Bouncken, R. B. (2015). Virtual currencies like bitcoin as a paradigm shift in the field of transactions. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 14(4), 575–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ron, D., & Shamir, A. (2012, February 27–March 2). Quantitative analysis of the full bitcoin transaction graph. In A. D. Keromytis & R. Hirschfeld (Chairs), International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (pp. 6–24), Springer, Bonaire/Heidelberg/. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235976346_Quantitative_Analysis_of_the_Full_Bitcoin_Transaction_Graph. Accessed 12 July 2017.

  • Ross, E. S. (2017). Nobody puts blockchain in a corner: The disruptive role of blockchain technology in the financial services industry and current regulatory issues. Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology, 25(2), 353–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A., & Chowa, C. (2006). Information system success: Individual and organisational determinants. Management Science, 52(12), 1849–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A., Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2007). Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for evaluation, 2007(114), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seebacher, S., & Schüritz, R. (2017, May). Blockchain technology as an enabler of service systems: A structured literature review. In International Conference on Exploring Services Science (pp. 12–23). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrier, D., Sharma, D., & Pentland, A. (2016). Blockchain & financial services: The fifth horizon of networked innovation. MIT Science Connection, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surujnath, R. (2017). Off the chain! A guide to blockchain derivatives markets and the implications on systemic risk. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law, 22(2), 256–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, M. (2015). Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. O’Reilly Media, Inc. Californa, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D., Tapscott, A., & Kirkland, R. (2016). How blockchains could change the world. McKinsey&Company. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/high-tech/our-insights/how-blockchains-could-change-the-world. Accessed 5 July 2017.

  • Thong, J. Y., & Yap, C. S. (1995). CEO characteristics, organisational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses. Omega, 23(4), 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treat, D., McGraw, L., Helbing, C., & Brodersen, C. (2017). Blockchain technology: Preparing for change. Retrieved from https://www.accenture.com/t20160608T052656Z__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/PDF-5/Accenture-2016-Top-10-Challenges-04-Blockchain-Technology.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2017.

  • Treiblmaier, H., & Pollach, I. (2011). The influence of privacy concerns on perceptions of web personalisation. International Journal of Web Science, 1(1/2), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiblmaier, H., Pinterits, A., & Floh, A. (2006). The adoption of public E-payment services. Journal of e-Government, 3(2), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, S. (2016). Blockchain beyond bitcoin. Communications of the ACM, 59(11), 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Weerd, I., Mangula, I. S., & Brinkkemper, S. (2016). Adoption of software as a service in Indonesia: Examining the influence of organisational factors. Information Management, 53(7), 915–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlasov, A. V. (2017). The evolution of E-money. European Research Studies, 20(1), 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. M., Wang, Y. S., & Yang, Y. F. (2010). Understanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(5), 803–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Chen, K., & Xu, D. (2016). A maturity model for blockchain adoption. Financial Innovation, 2(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., & Watson, T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organisational readiness for change. Implementation science, 4(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A., & De Filippi, P. (2015). Decentralised blockchain technology and the rise of lex cryptographia. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2580664. Accessed 9 July 2017.

  • Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2010). A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 435–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zyskind, G., Nathan, O., & Pentland, A. (2015). Decentralising privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data. In C. Irvine, & Z. Peterson (Chairs), 2015 IEEE Computer Society Security and Privacy Workshops, The Fairmont, San Jose, 21 May, IEEE, Washington DC, 180–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business Information Systems, Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, Galway, Ireland

    Trevor Clohessy

  2. Business Information Systems Department, J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland

    Thomas Acton & Nichola Rogers

Authors
  1. Trevor Clohessy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Acton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nichola Rogers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trevor Clohessy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of International Management, MODUL University Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Horst Treiblmaier

  2. Head of European Blockchain Center, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Roman Beck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clohessy, T., Acton, T., Rogers, N. (2019). Blockchain Adoption: Technological, Organisational and Environmental Considerations. In: Treiblmaier, H., Beck, R. (eds) Business Transformation through Blockchain. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98911-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation