Skip to main content

Introduction: A Feel for the Text

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism ((PSATLC))

Abstract

This introductory chapter situates the contributions of individual essays in this edited collection in the contexts of recent work in affect studies. Volume editor Stephen Ahern identifies concerns and insights shared by contributors as they work to incorporate lines of theory not always read together, accounting for the affective intensities that circulate through texts and readers and tracing the operations of affectively charged social scripts. In the process Ahern provides a wide-ranging critical introduction to an emerging field of research, one still striving to determine how literary critical practice might best be informed by recent theorizations of affect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the influence of process philosophers—especially James, Whitehead, Bergson, Deleuze—on thinking about such phenomena as emergence, flow, intensity, and the immanent potential of the virtual, see Massumi (1995, 2011).

  2. 2.

    And so Massumi writes eloquently of “the virtual as cresting in a liminal realm of emergence, where half-actualized actions and expressions arise like waves on a sea to which most no sooner return” (1995, 92).

  3. 3.

    See Sedgwick (2003, 8–9), and Chap. 4.

  4. 4.

    To counter what he decries as a tradition of dualistic, even fascistic thinking that aims to negate difference and above all ascribe a stable identity to the subject, Deleuze collapses subject-object distinction. He instead develops a vision of decentralized networks of relations always marked by potential, by flux, by a perpetual state of becoming rather than being. Deleuze celebrates the generation of multiplicity in a process of creative movement figured as lines of flight, as circulations of depersonalized intensities; disparate entities coalesce on a “plane of consistency,” forging new combinations, “assemblages,” communities. The most influential articulation of the revolutionary potential of such planar relations comes in the book Deleuze wrote with Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus (1987), especially the chapters “Rhizome” (3–25) and “Becoming-Intense, Becoming-Animal, Becoming-Imperceptible …” (232–309).

  5. 5.

    In his investigation of major American writers and artists from the 1840s to the 1980s, Frank “discern[s] in the work of these artists an acutely receptive and reflexive attention to the movement of feeling across and between text and reader, or composition and audience” (2015, 1). To account for such movements Frank develops a heuristic model of “transferential poetics” drawing on the theories of Silvan Tomkins, Melanie Klein, and Wilfred Bion.

References

  • Ahern, Stephen. 2007. Affected Sensibilities: Romantic Excess and the Genealogy of the Novel, 1680–1810. New York: AMS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Nothing More Than Feelings? Affect Theory Reads the Age of Sensibility. The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation 58 (3): 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Sarah. 2004. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anker, Elizabeth S., and Rita Felski, eds. 2017. Critique and Postcritique. Raleigh, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Amanda, and Mario DiGangi, eds. 2017. Affect Theory and Early Modern Texts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, Lauren. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Thomas. 2003. From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Felski, Rita. 2009. After Suspicion. Profession 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Figlerowicz, Marta. 2012. Affect Theory Dossier: An Introduction. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences 20 (2): 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Spaces of Feeling: Affect and Awareness in Modernist Literature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Adam. 2015. Transferential Poetics from Poe to Warhol. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, Claire. 2014. The Materials of Reparation. Feminist Theory 15 (1): 27–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, Patrick Colm. 2016. Affect Studies and Literary Criticism. In The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Literature. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, Britta Timm, and Carsten Stage, eds. 2015. Affective Methodologies: Developing Cultural Research Strategies for the Study of Affect. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, Heather. 2007. Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, Nicholas. 2017. Why Study Unknowable Intensities? On Contemporary Affect Theory, with an Interview with Rachel Greenwald Smith. Revue française d’études américaines 151 (2): 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, Brian. 1995. The Autonomy of Affect. Cultural Critique 31: 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Semblance and Event: Activist Philosophy and the Occurrent Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Alan T. 1990. Certain, Lively Episodes: The Articulation of Passion in Eighteenth-Century Prose. Athens: Georgia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noggle, James. 2015. Unfelt Affect. In Beyond Sense and Sensibility: Moral Formation and the Literary Imagination from Johnson to Wordsworth, ed. Peggy Thompson, 125–143. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, Adela. 1996. Strange Fits of Passion: Epistemologies of Emotion, Hume to Austen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabaté, Jean-Michel. 2016. The Pathos of Distance: Affects of the Moderns. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowner, Ilai. 2015. The Event: Literature and Theory. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. 2003. Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, and Adam Frank. 1995. Shame in the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins. Introduction to Shame and Its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader, ed. Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Adam Frank, 1–29. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seigworth, Gregory J., and Melissa Gregg. 2010. An Inventory of Shimmers. Introduction to The Affect Theory Reader, ed. Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth, 1–25. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Rachel Greenwald. 2015. Affect and American Literature in the Age of Neoliberalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Kathleen. 2007. Ordinary Affects. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thrailkill, Jane F. 2006. Emotive Realism. Journal of Narrative Theory 36 (3): 365–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Affecting Fictions: Mind, Body, and Emotion in American Literary Realism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, Pieter. 2015. Contemporary Literature and the End of the Novel: Creature, Affect, Form. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wehrs, Donald R., and Thomas Blake, eds. 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, Margaret. 2012. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Affect and Discourse—What’s the Problem? From Affect as Excess to Affective/Discursive Practice. Subjectivity 6 (4): 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilputte, Earla. 2014. Passion and Language in Eighteenth-Century Literature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wimsatt, Jr., W. K., and M. C. Beardsley. 1949. The Affective Fallacy. The Sewanee Review 57 (1): 31–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ahern, S. (2019). Introduction: A Feel for the Text. In: Ahern, S. (eds) Affect Theory and Literary Critical Practice. Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97268-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics