Skip to main content

The Concept of Crowdfunding in the West Versus in China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

Crowdfunding originated as start-up finance, yet in the meantime has undergone some change. Moreover, crowdfunding in China differs substantially from the original (Western) concept. This difference not least can be seen from the various terms that describe different forms of crowdfunding. Whilst Western literature mainly distinguish between four types of crowdfunding—donations, rewards, debts (P2P) and equity, Chinese scholars clearly distinguish between P2P and crowdfunding. Within the latter, Chinese further distinguish between product-based (donations and rewards) and equity-based crowdfunding. This chapter provides a detailed analysis of the different forms of crowdfunding in the context of New Institutional Economics, it contrasts crowdfunding to classical financial intermediaries and finally explains the rational argument behind the choice for crowdfunding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Howe (2006).

  2. 2.

    Kleemann and Voß (2008, p. 5).

  3. 3.

    Belleflamme et al. (2010, p. 5).

  4. 4.

    Belleflamme et al. (2013, p. 5).

  5. 5.

    BBC News Magazine (2013, n.p.).

  6. 6.

    This amount would equal to about USD 2.52 million today (BBC News Magazine 2013).

  7. 7.

    Equity- and debt-based crowdfunding sometimes are further subsumed under the term crowdinvesting.

  8. 8.

    de Buysere et al. (2012, p. 10 ff).

  9. 9.

    infoDev (2013, p. 17).

  10. 10.

    However, I argue that P2P also not necessarily meets all features of crowdfunding. If a project is realised by one singular person, then finance is also not outsourced to the crowd, but just to one single external peer. Yet, most Western scholars regard P2P as a sub-category of crowdfunding.

  11. 11.

    Fink (2015, p. 4).

  12. 12.

    I.e. the Western crowdfunding model.

  13. 13.

    Cumming et al. (2016, p. 2). Some platforms like the American Indigogo in fact offer both models, KIA and AON.

  14. 14.

    Cumming et al. (2016, p. 1).

  15. 15.

    Press (2015).

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    E.g. Stiver et al. (2015); Davies (2014); Hainzer et al. (2014).

  18. 18.

    Wheat et al. (2013, p. 2).

  19. 19.

    Belleflamme et al. (2010, p. 3).

  20. 20.

    From the crowdfunders’ perspective it is in fact pre-ordering; see also further below.

  21. 21.

    In this specific example of the musician, crowdfunding relies on what Scott has called fan-ancing as often such a project is realised by the contribution of fans (Scott 2015, p. 167 ff.).

  22. 22.

    In order to cover all costs for the preparation of the campaign, the recording of the video, the production of the rewards, etc. usually the target sum is set higher than the actual funding demand.

  23. 23.

    Kleemann and Voß (2008, p. 5).

  24. 24.

    The term prosumer was first mentioned by Toffler (1980).

  25. 25.

    The verb crowdfund refers to the act of funding a project through small contributions by many investors, usually via a CFP.

  26. 26.

    Belleflamme et al. (2014).

  27. 27.

    Leadbeater and Miller (2004, p. 12).

  28. 28.

    “Web 2.0 has been the term used to describe the social Web, where social networking sites hold a prominent place in users’ online activities. The shift to this more interactive Web from Web 1.0 generally occurred as a result of technological changes that made the Internet—and the ability to develop content—more accessible. […] In Web 2.0, applications are also more likely to be open source, providing users with a greater ability to influence the Web.” (Techopedia n.d.).

  29. 29.

    Lambert and Schwienbacher (2010, p. 5).

  30. 30.

    Kleemann and Voß (2008, p. 6).

  31. 31.

    Freedman and Nutting (2015, p. 1).

  32. 32.

    infoDev (2013, p. 14).

  33. 33.

    Kleemann and Voß (2008, p. 10).

  34. 34.

    Startnext (2014).

  35. 35.

    I assume that all projects which received sufficient funding were eventually realised, irrespective of BMW’s choice. However, the crowdfunders’ ranking was not said to have any impact on BMW’s final choice.

  36. 36.

    Kühl (2013).

  37. 37.

    Bradley (2008).

  38. 38.

    McDonald (2015).

  39. 39.

    See e.g. Young (2013); Lawton and Marom (2013); Spirer (2014); Schramm and Carstens (2014).

  40. 40.

    E.g. Wallhäuser (2014).

  41. 41.

    E.g. Junge and Eidinger (2013).

  42. 42.

    E.g. Koch Ramos (2014).

  43. 43.

    Bachmann et al. (2011, p. 13).

  44. 44.

    Lehner (2012).

  45. 45.

    They explicitly mention peer-to-peer lending at interest (i.e. debt-based crowdfunding), peer-to-peer investing in return for equity/future income (i.e. equity-based crowdfunding), peer-to-peer funding given without expectation of return or with expectation of token return (i.e. donation- and reward-based crowdfunding respectively) (Feller et al. (2013, p. 5).

  46. 46.

    I.e. debt-based or P2P crowdfunding.

  47. 47.

    Feller et al. (2013, p. 11).

  48. 48.

    Feller et al. (2013, p. 14).

  49. 49.

    Presumably, some of the identified papers could not be assigned to any category as the sum of the three categories is less than 127.

  50. 50.

    Moritz and Block (2016) in their article referred to the working paper of Burtch et al. 2014; this paper was thereafter published in a journal in 2014.

  51. 51.

    This has been confirmed by e.g. Belleflamme et al. (2013); Gerber et al. (2012); Schwienbacher and Larralde (2012).

  52. 52.

    Belleflamme et al. (2013, p. 325).

  53. 53.

    Belleflamme et al. (2010, 2014).

  54. 54.

    Gerber et al. (2012).

  55. 55.

    Schwienbacher and Larralde (2012, p. 378).

  56. 56.

    Gerber et al. (2012, p. 5 ff).

  57. 57.

    Dorfleitner et al. (2014, p. 32).

  58. 58.

    Kim and Hann (2016, p. 1).

  59. 59.

    Arner et al. (2015, p. 15).

  60. 60.

    Lapavitsas (2013a, p. 18).

  61. 61.

    Agrawal et al. (2013, p. 11).

  62. 62.

    Kim and Hann (2016, p. 4).

  63. 63.

    Cumming et al. (2016).

  64. 64.

    Schwienbacher and Larralde (2012, p. 379).

  65. 65.

    Hui et al. (2012, p. 2).

  66. 66.

    Mollick (2014, p. 3).

  67. 67.

    Agrawal et al. (2013, p. 7).

  68. 68.

    Horwitz (2016).

  69. 69.

    Agrawal et al. (2013, p. 18).

  70. 70.

    Gerber et al. (2012, p. 8).

  71. 71.

    Gerber et al. (2012, p. 3).

  72. 72.

    Gerber et al. (2012, p. 6 ff).

  73. 73.

    Schwienbacher and Larralde explicitly mentioned recognition as an intrinsic motivation to contribute to a CF campaign, though recognition per se is not an intrinsic phenomenon. I suppose that the authors in this context rather meant self-esteem.

  74. 74.

    Schwienbacher and Larralde (2012, p. 386).

  75. 75.

    Agrawal et al. (2013, p. 15).

  76. 76.

    Burtch et al. (2014, p. 779).

  77. 77.

    Blohm et al. (2013).

  78. 78.

    Agrawal et al. (2013, p. 16).

  79. 79.

    Agrawal et al. (2013, p. 19).

  80. 80.

    Ahlers et al. (2012, p. 1).

  81. 81.

    Frydrych et al. (2014).

  82. 82.

    Mollick (2014, p. 1).

  83. 83.

    Frydrych et al. (2014, p. 247).

  84. 84.

    Kuppuswamy and Bayus (2016, p. 18).

  85. 85.

    Lambert and Schwienbacher (2010); Belleflamme et al. (2013, 2014); Saxton and Wang (2014).

  86. 86.

    Mollick and Kuppuswamy (2015, p. 2).

  87. 87.

    Frydrych et al. (2014, p. 247).

  88. 88.

    Kuppuswamy and Bayus (2016, p. 18).

  89. 89.

    Ahlers et al. (2012, Abstract).

  90. 90.

    Kuppuswamy and Bayus (2016, p. 1).

  91. 91.

    Although the CFP provides the infrastructure for continuous updates, in fact, the PI is responsible for all contents of his campaign. Moreover, it is his task to regularly inform the crowd about news and the campaign’s progress.

  92. 92.

    Nahapiet and Sumantra (1998, p. 243).

  93. 93.

    Giudici et al. (2013, p. 2).

  94. 94.

    Ibid.

  95. 95.

    Colombo et al. (2015, p. 75).

  96. 96.

    Lehner (2012, p. 478).

  97. 97.

    Agrawal et al. (2011, p. 2).

  98. 98.

    Wong et al. (2009).

  99. 99.

    Burtch et al. (2014, p. 773).

  100. 100.

    Agrawal et al. (2011, 2013, 2015).

  101. 101.

    Agrawal et al. (2011, p. 1).

  102. 102.

    Agrawal et al. (2011, p. 15).

  103. 103.

    Nahapiet and Sumantra (1998).

  104. 104.

    Zheng et al. (2014, p. 490).

  105. 105.

    Guanxi are “personalized connections and related social networks characterized by relations of reciprocity, i.e. the giving and receiving of favours. […] [One can] note the significance of such personal relationships in the supposedly impersonal world of business networks” (Castree et al. 2013, n.p.).

  106. 106.

    Zheng et al. (2014, p. 493).

  107. 107.

    Agrawal et al. (2013, abstract).

  108. 108.

    Hui et al. (2012, 2015).

  109. 109.

    Hui et al. (2012, p. 4).

  110. 110.

    Hui et al. (2012, p. 10).

  111. 111.

    “The JOBS Act works to increase access to capital by scaling back new regulations and modifying old regulations through three main mechanisms: the initial public offerings (IPO) ‘on-ramp,’ crowdfunding, and mini-public offerings. It affects an extensive list of laws, including the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), and the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.” (Salzsieder and Cornell 2013, p. 18).

  112. 112.

    Salzsieder and Cornell (2013, p. 18).

  113. 113.

    See e.g. Fink (2015); Salzsieder and Cornell (2013); Stemler (2013).

  114. 114.

    Gabison (2015).

  115. 115.

    Hooghiemstra and Buysere (2016, p. 146).

  116. 116.

    infoDev (2013, p. 5).

  117. 117.

    Xia et al. (2015).

  118. 118.

    The keyword search was conducted on November 12, 2015.

  119. 119.

    One reason for Baidu’s prominence in China, amongst others, is that Google is officially banned there.

  120. 120.

    This database was provided by CrossAsia.org.

  121. 121.

    As internet finance is a subcategory of FinTech, two further keyword searches were conducted with FinTech and its Chinese equivalent jinrong keji (金融科技) on October 30, 2016. These searches produced 33,900,000 results on Google, and 18,400,000 records on Baidu. From my own observations, I assume that in the West the term FinTech is more prominent than internet finance, whereas Chinese rather use hulianwang jinrong (互联网金融) (i.e. internet finance) than jinrong keji (金融科技) (i.e. FinTech). However, as mentioned in Sect. 2.5 despite their difference in definition, internet finance and FinTech are often used as synonyms. In order to get an idea of the prominence of crowdfunding, two further keyword searches were conducted on Google (with crowdfunding) and on Baidu (with zhongchou (众筹)) respectively as of October 30, 2016. Crowdfunding on Google provided 31,300,000 results, which was less than half of the 69,600,000 records related to zhongchou (众筹) on Baidu.

  122. 122.

    The keyword search was conducted on November 12, 2015.

  123. 123.

    Sheng et al. (2014, pp. 5–13).

  124. 124.

    See e.g. Tu [涂涛] (2014); Liu [刘文献] (2015a); Yang [杨东] et al. (2015); amongst others.

  125. 125.

    Yang [杨东] et al. (2015, p. 55); Yin (2015, p. 58).

  126. 126.

    Wen (2015, p. 75).

  127. 127.

    Tu [涂涛] (2014, p. 103).

  128. 128.

    E.g. Yu et al. (2015, pp. 124–140); Luo et al. (2012, p. 100 ff; p. 179 ff); Yao (2014, p. 38 ff); Hu (2014, p. 43 ff); Huang and Deng (2014, p. 20 ff); amongst others.

  129. 129.

    P2P is overseen by the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC), whereas (equity-based) crowdfunding in China is regulated by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC). Donation- and reward-based crowdfunding do not demand any supervision. (Interview with Du Mengjie, 2015-04-16.)

  130. 130.

    See e.g. Zheng et al. (2015).

  131. 131.

    Sun (2015, p. 32).

  132. 132.

    Ding (2015, p. 51).

  133. 133.

    See Sect. 3.1.

  134. 134.

    Yu (2015a, p. 12).

  135. 135.

    Sun (2015).

  136. 136.

    Fan (2013).

  137. 137.

    Meng et al. (2014).

  138. 138.

    Jiang (2015).

  139. 139.

    See e.g. Shao (2012).

  140. 140.

    Sun (2015).

  141. 141.

    See e.g. Cai and Wang (2014); Hu (2015).

  142. 142.

    See e.g. Yu (2015c); Ye and Wu (2015).

  143. 143.

    See e.g. Chai (2014); Zhang (2014); Liu (2015b).

  144. 144.

    see e.g. Zhong and Wang (2015).

  145. 145.

    See e.g. Wen (2015); Lin (2015); Fan (2015).

  146. 146.

    See e.g. Li (2015a); Luo and Cheng (2015).

  147. 147.

    The evolvement of real estate crowdfunding correlates with the creation of China’s recent real estate bubble, of which analysts in 2016 feared that it could burst in the near future (Sands (2016)).

  148. 148.

    Tan (2015).

  149. 149.

    n.a. (2014, p. 43).

  150. 150.

    JD.com is “China’s largest online direct sales company.” (JD.com n.d.).

  151. 151.

    For more information on Alibaba see Sect. 4.4.2.1.

  152. 152.

    Tan (2015, p. 74 ff).

  153. 153.

    Huang et al. (2015).

  154. 154.

    I.e. Kickstarter and Indigogo.

  155. 155.

    Zero2IPO (2014, p. 9).

  156. 156.

    USD 509 versus USD 77.

  157. 157.

    The platform Demohour, for instance, no longer counts as CFP.

  158. 158.

    E.g. Jingdong zhongchou and Taobao zhongchou.

  159. 159.

    Li (2014, p. 50).

  160. 160.

    Zero2IPO (2015).

  161. 161.

    iResearch is a Chinese analytics and consulting company focussing on online consumption in China.

  162. 162.

    iResearch (2016a).

  163. 163.

    Zhang et al. (2014, p. 42).

  164. 164.

    Ibid.

  165. 165.

    Zhang et al. (2014, p. 43 ff).

  166. 166.

    Both, from Western and also Asian researchers.

  167. 167.

    Interview with Luke Deer, one of the editors of The Asia-Pacific Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report, 2016-01-21.

  168. 168.

    As both, the PI and the crowd only indirectly cooperate with the trustee, I do not analyse the relationships between the trustee and the PI and the trustee and the crowd respectively. Still the trustee can be relevant as in some countries CFPs are not allowed to manage the investments of the crowd themselves.

  169. 169.

    Kortleben and Vollmar (2012, p. 3).

  170. 170.

    Kortleben and Vollmar (2012, p. 3) in this regard also state that PIs cannot ensure the solvency of interested crowdfunders. The authors exclusively refer to equity-based crowdfunders (i.e. crowdinvestors). Whilst for donation-/rewards-/debt-based crowdfunders, this danger can be neglected, for equity-based crowdfunding insolvency indeed is relevant.

  171. 171.

    Kortleben and Vollmar (2012, p. 5).

  172. 172.

    Ibid.

  173. 173.

    Platforms can demonstrate the quality of their services by e.g. stating the number of successfully funded projects in relation to the overall number of listed projects.

  174. 174.

    Kortleben and Vollmar (2012).

  175. 175.

    This only refers to reward-based CF; in case of equity CF, the PI has to think of the number of shares and the value per share.

  176. 176.

    E.g. in comparison to the PI.

  177. 177.

    CF transactions can be occasional, if a PI starts another project or if a crowdfunder invests in several projects.

  178. 178.

    See Mollick and Kuppuswamy (2015, p. 2), who have discovered that a listing on Kickstarter correlates with a successful funding.

  179. 179.

    See e.g. Stemler (2013); Carni (2014).

  180. 180.

    Civic crowdfunding describes the funding of a public good financed by the crowd via crowdfunding.

  181. 181.

    See e.g. Dapp (2013).

  182. 182.

    However, as noted in Sect. 3.3.1, different regulations across countries still impede cross-country crowdfunding projects.

  183. 183.

    Sometimes the disbursements of a credit association are adjusted to inflation; however, commonly members of a ROSCA do not pay any interest on their loans.

  184. 184.

    Kickstarter e.g. as of May 2016 charged a commission of 5%, whereas the average interest rate for informal finance in China in 2004 and 2006 was estimated to be at 16.4% (Li 2009, p. 53; see also Sect. 2.4.2).

  185. 185.

    Interview with Conor Roche, 2015-05-06.

  186. 186.

    Frearson (2015).

  187. 187.

    Volksbanken Raiffeisenbanken (n.d).

  188. 188.

    See e.g. Agrawal et al. (2011).

  189. 189.

    By contrast, Schwienbacher and Larralde (2012, p. 378) regard a bank loan as “stupid money”.

  190. 190.

    For instance, in 2014, the average project on the German donation-/rewards-based CFP Startnext achieved EUR 8415 (own calculation based on Startnext n.p.). Projects on Seedmatch, a German equity-based CFP, on average collected EUR 312,213 (own calculation based on Seedmatch n.d.).

  191. 191.

    Donation-based crowdfunding is an exception as crowdfunders of donation-based campaigns deliberately contribute funds without expecting any returns.

  192. 192.

    Klein (2014); and own observation.

  193. 193.

    See e.g. Giudici et al. (2013); Zheng et al. (2014).

  194. 194.

    Giudici et al. (2013).

  195. 195.

    Agrawal et al. (2011).

  196. 196.

    Artmorpheus, (2012).

  197. 197.

    This refers to countries where Facebook is the dominant social medium. For other countries (like China) other social media (like WeChat) would be a better indicator.

References

  • Agrawal A, Catalini, C, Goldfarb, A (2011) Friends, family, and the flat world: the geography of crowdfunding: working paper. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://nber.org/papers/w16820.pdf

  • Agrawal A, Catalini, C, Goldfarb, A (2013) Some simple economics of crowdfunding: working paper 19133, Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w19133

  • Agrawal A, Catalini, C, Goldfarb, A (2015) Crowdfunding: geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. J Econ Manag Strateg 24(2):253–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlers G, Cumming D, Guenther C, Schweizer D (2012) Signaling in equity crowdfunding. SSRN Electron J. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2161587. Accessed 12 Feb 2014.

  • Arner D, Barberis J, Buckley, R (2015) The evolution of fintech: a new post-crisis paradigm? University of Hong Kong Faculty of law research paper no. 2015/047. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2676553. Accessed 27 Oct 2016

  • Artmorpheus (ed) (2012) How to run a successful crowdfunding campaign. https://artmorpheus.wordpress.com/2012/02/27/postshow-to-run-a-successful-crowdfunding-campaign/. Accessed 30 Nov 2016

  • Bachmann A, Becker A, Buerckner D, Hilker M, Kock F, Lehmann M, Tiburtius, P, Funk, B (2011) Online peer-to-peer lending – a literature review. J Internet Bank Commer 16(2):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News Magazine (2013) The statue of liberty and America’s crowdfunding pioneer. http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21932675. Accessed 15 Jan 2016

  • Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2010) Crowdfunding: an industrial organization perspective. In: Workshop on digital business models: understanding strategies, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2013). Individual crowdfunding practices. Ventur Cap 15(4):313–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2013.785151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2014) Crowdfunding: tapping the right crowd. J Bus Ventur 29:585–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blohm I, Gebert M, Wenzlaff K, Leimeister JM (eds) (2013) Crowdfunding-Studie 2013/2013: Analyse, Perspektiven und Erfolgsfaktoren innovativer Unternehmens- und Projektfinanzierungen. epubli GmbH, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley T (2008) Final fundraising figure: Obama’s 750M. Edited by abc News. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=6397572&page=1. Accessed 16 Jan 2016

  • Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2014) Cultural differences and geography as determinants of online prosocial lending. MIS Q 38(3):773–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai H [蔡海宁], Wang L [王雷] (2014) 互联网金融之众筹的法律思考 [Legal considerations on crowdfunding as an art of internet finance]. 仲裁研究 [Zhongcai yanjiu] 37:116–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Carni US (2014) Protecting the crowd through escrow: three ways that the SEC can portect crowdfunding investors. Fordham J Corp Financ Law 19:681–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Castree N, Kitchin R, Rogers A (2013). A dictionary of human geography: guanxi. Oxford quick reference collection, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chai K [柴珂楠] (2014) ‘欧盟众筹金融监管法律框架及评枒 [A review of the legal framework of crowdfunding in the European union]’. 南方金融 July(455):40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo M, Franzoni C, Lamastra CR (2015) Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Enterp Theory Pract 39(1):75–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming D, Leboeuf G, Schwienbacher A (2016) Crowdfunding models: keep-it-all vs. all-or-nothing. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2447567. Accessed 15 Jan

  • Dahlmann C (1979) The problem of externality. J Law Econ 22(1):141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dapp T (2013) Crowdfunding: an alternative source of funding with potential. Edited by Deutsche Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies R (2014) Three provocations for civic crowdfunding. Inf Commun Soc 18(3):342–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.989878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Buysere K, Gajda O, Kleverlaan R, Marom D (2012) A framework for European crowdfunding. www.europecrowdfunding.org/Resources/Documents/FRAMEWORK_EU_CROWDFUNDING.pdf. Accessed 23 Feb 2014

  • Ding L [丁玲] (2015) 众筹的作用机制与企业融资选择 [The function of crowdfunding and choice of business finance]. 中国物价 [Zhongguo wujia] 10:51–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfleitner G, Kapitz J, Wimmer M (2014) Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative für kleine und mittlere Unternehmen. http://epub.uni-regensburg.de/30104/1/preprint.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2016

  • Fan J [范家琛] (2013) 众筹商业模式研究 [Research on the nature of the crowdfunding industry]. Enterp Econ August(396):72–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Y [樊云慧] (2015) 股权众筹平台监管的国际比较 [An international comparison of the supervision of equity crowdfunding platforms]. 法学 [Faxue] 4:84–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller J, Gleasure R, Treacy S (2013) From the wisdom to the wealth of crowds: a metatriangulation of crowdfunding research: (TOTO working paper 2013.01 v2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink A (2015) Protecting the crowd and raising capital through the JOBS Act: SSRN working paper No. 2046051. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=2046051. Accessed 7 Nov

  • Frearson A (2015) Crowdfunded Luchtsingel pedestrian bridge opens in Rotterdam. Edited by dezeen magazine. http://www.dezeen.com/2015/07/16/luchtsingel-elevated-pathways-bridges-rotterdam-cityscapezus-architects/. Accessed 13 July 2016

  • Freedman D, Nutting M (2015) A brief history of crowdfunding: including rewards, donation, debt, and equity platforms in the USA. http://www.freedman-chicago.com/ec4i/History-of-Crowdfunding.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2016

  • Frydrych D, Bock A, Kinder T, Koeck B (2014) Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding . Ventur Cap 16(3), 247–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn E, Richter R (1991) The new institutional economics: an assessment. In: Furubotn E, Richter R The New Institutional Economics. J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabison G (2015) Equity crowdfunding: all regulated but not equal. DePaul Bus Commer Law J 13(3):359–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber E, Hui J, Kuo P-Y (2012) Crowdfunding: why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms: technical report 12-02. Northwest University, Segal Design Institute, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Giudici G, Guerini M, Lamastra CR (2013) Why crowdfunding projects can succeed: the role of proponents’ individual and territorial social capital. SSRN Electron J. 2255944:1–20. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2255944. Accessed 27 Oct 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas P, Blohm I, Leimeister JM (2014) An empirical taxonomy of crowdfunding intermediaries. Paper presented at the international conference on information systems (ICIS), Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hainzer M, Stötzer S, Ellmer M (2014) Crowdfunding-basierte Bür- gerkreditmodelle in Kommunen. Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen 37(1–2):54–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghiemstra S, de Buysere K (2016) The perfect regulation of crowdfunding: what should the European regulator do? In: Brüntje D, Gajda O (eds) Crowdfunding in Europe. FGF studies in small business and entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham, pp 135–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz J (2016) Your brilliant Kickstarter idea could be on sale in China before you’ve even finished funding it. Edited by Quartz. http://qz.com/771727/chinas-factories-in-shenzhen-can-copy-productsat- breakneck- speed- and- its- time- for- the- rest- of- the- world- to- getover-it/. Accessed 19 Nov 2016

  • Howe J (2006) The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag 14(6):1–4. http://www.wired.com/2006/06/crowds/

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu X [胡晓军] (2014) 中国金融新生态 [China’s new finance ecology?]: 全面解析互联网金融 [A comprehensive analysis of internet finance] SS new management bookshelf. Renmin youdian chubanshe, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu M [胡梦婷] (2015) 众筹的主要法律风险及其防范 [Main legal risks and preventions in crowdfunding]. 连云港职业技术学院学报 [J Lianyungang Tech Coll] 28(2):33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J [黄健青], Chen H [陈欢], Li D [李大夜] (2015) 基于顾客价值视角的众筹项目成功影响因素研究 [Investigating successful influencing factors of crowdfunding projects from the perspective of customer value]. Zhongguo ruanke xue 6:116–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z [黄震], Deng J [邓建鹏] (2014) 互联网金融 [Internet finance]: 法律于风险控制 [Law and risk control]. Jixie gongye chubanshe, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui J, Gerber E, Greenberg, M (2012) Easy money? The demands of crowdfunding work: technical report no. 4. Northwestern University, Segal Design Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui J, Greenberg M, Gerber E (2015) Understanding crowdfunding work: implications for support tools. In: CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, pp 889–894. http://www.juliehui.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/. Accessed 7 Nov

  • infoDev (2013) Crowdfunding’s potential for the developing world. Edited by The World Bank. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • iResearch (ed) (2016a) 中国权益众筹市场研究报告 [China reward-based crowd-funding market research report]: 2015年 [2015]. http://img1.zczhijia.com/file/20150812/6357496944244478907407180.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan

  • JD.com (ed) (n.d.) Corporate website. http://www.jd.com/. Accessed 13th Feb 2017

  • Jiang Y [蒋英燕] (2015) 众筹模式与青年创业的契合度初探 [Initial investigation of the compatibility of crowdfunding kinds and start-ups]. Zhejiang Jinrong July:8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Junge R, Eidinger P (2013) Crowdfunding – ein Finanzierungsmodell für Kulturprojekte? Grin Verlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Hann I-H (2016) Does crowdfunding democratize access to finance? A geographical analysis of technology projects. SSRN Electron J. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2334590. Accessed 27 Nov

  • Kleemann F, Voß G (2008). Un(der)paid innovators: the commercial utilization of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Sci Technol Innov Stud 4(1):5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, K (2014) How to raise money for a prototype. Edited by Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-10-30/small-business-how-to-raise-money-for-a-prototype. Accessed 21 Dec 2016

  • Koch Ramos P (2014). Crowdfunding als Finanzierungsmodell: Am Beispiel von Independent Video Games. 1. Aufl. Saarbrücken: AV Akademikerverlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortleben H, Vollmar B (2012) Crowdinvesting, an innovative option for start-up financing? Conference Paper. In: 7th European conference on innovation and entrepreneurship

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühl E (2013) Hollywood lässt den Klingelbeutel kreisen. Edited by Zeit Online. http://www.zeit.de/kultur/film/2013-05/hollywood-kickstarter-zach-braff-veronica-mars. Accessed 16 Jan 2016

  • Kuppuswamy V, Bayus B (2016) Crowdfunding creative ideas: the dynamics of project backers in Kickstarter: UNC Kenan-Flagler research paper no. 2013-15. SSRN Electron J. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2234765. Accessed 21 Aug

  • Lambert T, Schwienbacher A (2010) An empirical analysis of crowdfunding: working paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1578175. Accessed 1 Feb 2014

  • Lapavitsas C (2013a) Financialization in crisis. Historical materialism book series, vol 32. Haymarket Books, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton K, Marom D (2013) The crowdfunding revolution: how to raise venture capital using social media. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater C, Miller P (2004) The pro-am revolution: how enthusiasts are changing our economy and society. Demos, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner O (2012) A literature review and research agenda for crowdfunding of social ventures. In: Research colloquium on social entrepreneurship. University of Oxford, Skoll Center of SAID Business School, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J (2009) Informal finance, underground finance, illegal finance, and economic movement: a national analysis. In: Li J, Hsu S (eds) Informal finance in China. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 39–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Y [李耀东] (2014) 众筹发展的左和右 [The pros and cons of crowdfunding development]. 金融博览 [Jinrong bolan] November:50–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Li D [李丹] (2015a) 房地产众筹现状之法律问题探讨 [A discussion of the legal questions of the situation of real estate crowdfunding]. 法制博览 [Leg Vis] 7(中):17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin S [林思含] (2015) 互联网时代音乐电台的众筹模式研究——以日本音乐电台众筹模式为例 [Research on the crowdfunding mode of the music radio station in the internet era – an example of japanese crowdfunding of the music radio station]. 中国广播 [Zhongguo guangbo] January:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W [刘文献] (ed) (2015a) 解放众筹 [Crowdfunding revolution]: Crowdfunding revolution. Zhongguo caizheng jingji chuban she, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y [刘瑜恒] (2015b) 美国股权众筹立法发展及其借鉴意义 [The development of America’s equity crowdfunding legislation and implications from its model]. 证券法苑 [Zhengquan fayuan] 14:361–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo H [罗弘韬], Cheng N [程楠] (2015) 房地产众筹的非法集资风险分析 [Risk analysis of illegal fundraising of real estate crowdfunding]. 大众理财顾问 [Dazhong licai guwen] 10:86–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo M [罗明雄], Tang Y [唐颖] and Yong L [刘勇] (2012) 互联网金融 [Internet finance] Zhongguo caizheng jingji chuban she, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald S (2015) Islamic state using social media as crowdfunding platform for terrorist activities, expert warns. Edited by ABC Online Services. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-17/is-using-social-media-to-crowdfund-terrorist-activities/6948374. Accessed 16 Jan 2016

  • Meng T [孟韬], Zhang L [张黎明], Dong D [董大海] (2014) 众筹的发展及其商业模式研究 [Research on the development of crowdfunding and its business model]. Innov Entrep 2:50–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollick E (2014) The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. J Bus Ventur 29(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollick E, Kuppuswamy V (2015). After the campaign: outcomes of crowdfunding: UNC Kenan-Flagler research paper no. 2376997. SSRN Electron J. http://ssrn.com/abstact=2376997. Accessed 7 Nov

  • Moritz A, Block J (2016) Crowdfunding: a literature review and research directions. In: Brüntje D, Gajda O (eds) Crowdfunding in Europe. FGF studies in small business and entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham, pp 25–53

    Google Scholar 

  • n.a. (2014) 众筹: 最好的时代, 最坏的时代 [Crowdfunding: the best and the worst time]. China Comput Commun May:43–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manag Rev 23(2):242–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press G (2015) 15 Most-funded crowdfunding projects on Kickstarter and Indiegogo. Edited by Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2015/02/16/15-most-funded-crowdfunding-projects-on-kickstarterand-indiegogo/\#2715e4857a0b6c7357677ba9. Accessed 16 Jan 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzsieder L, Cornell D (2013) A critical look at the jumpstart our business startups act: considering the debate surrounding its provisions and implications. CPA J 83(6):18–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands S (2016) George Soros: Is China becoming the US of 2008? Why George Soros sees warning signs in China. Edited by Market Realist. http://marketrealist.com/2016/05/george-soros-says-chinas-surging-credit-growth-warning-sign/. Accessed 11 July 2016

  • Saxton G, Wang L (2014) The social network effect: the determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 43(5):850–868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013485159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schramm DM, Carstens J (2014) Startup-crowdfunding und crowdin-vesting: Ein guide für gründer: Mit kapital aus der crowd junge unternehmen online finanzieren. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwienbacher A, Larralde B (2012) Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures. In: Cumming D (ed) The Oxford handbook of entrepreneurial finance. Oxford handbooks. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 369–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciencestarter (ed) (n.d.) Leitfaden für Projektstarter. https://www.sciencestarter.de/Infos/leitfaden.html. Accessed 28 April 2016

  • Scott S (2015) The moral economy of crowdfunding and the transformative capacity of fan-ancing. New Media Soc 17(2):167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seedmatch (ed) (n.d.) Für Investoren. https://www.seedmatch.de/fuer-investoren. Accessed 29 May 2016

  • Shao G (2012) Internet law in China. Chandos Publishing, Oxford. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9781843346487.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng J [盛佳], Ke B [柯斌], Yang Q [杨倩] (eds) (2014) 众筹 [Crowdfunding]. Jixie gongye chubanshe, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Spirer G (2014) Crowdfunding: the next big thing: money-raising secrets of the digital age. CreateSpace, North Charleston

    Google Scholar 

  • Startnext (ed) (2014) Mobility experience challenge. https://bmw.startnext.com/\#!home. Accessed 16 Jan 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemler AR (2013) The JOBS act and crowdfunding: harnessing the power—and money—of the masses. Bus Horiz 56(3):271–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiver A, Barroca L, Minocha S, Richards M, Roberts D (2015) Civic crowdfunding research: challenges, opportunities, and future agenda. New Media Soc 17(2):249–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814558914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun X [孙学立] (2015) 我国众筹融资模式及监管问题研究 [China’s crowdfunding models and potential research questions]. J Reg Financ Res 6 (511):32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan Y [覃怡敏] (2015) 2015, 众筹该怎么玩? [How to have fun with crowdfunding in 2015?] Zhongguo jingji xinxi July (535):74–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Techopedia (ed) (n.d.) Web 1.0. https://www.techopedia.com/definition/27960/web-10. Accessed 26 Sept 2016

  • Toffler A (1980) The third wave. Bantam Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu T [涂涛] (2014) 一本书读懂互联网金融 [A guidebook to internet finance]. Di qi e guan li shi wu cong shu hu lian wang jing ji. Renmin youdian chubanshe, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Volksbanken Raiffeisenbanken (n.d.) Viele schaffen mehr: Gemeinnütziges Crowdfunding mit den Volksbanken Raiffeisenbanken. Edited by Volksbanken Raiffeisenbanken. https://www.viele-schaffen-mehr.de/. Accessed 27 May 2016

  • Wallhäuser M (2014) Crowdfunding for Food: Finanzierungsalternative für landwirtschaftliche Betriebe. Crowdfunding-Studienreihe. epubli, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen B [闻博] (2015) 国内外众筹融资模式发展现状及我国发展建议 [The current domestic and international development of crowdfunding as well as a proposal for China]. 对外经贸 [Duiwai jingmao] 8(254):75–76, 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheat R, Wang Y, Bymes J, Ranganathan J (2013) Raising money for scientific research through crowdfunding. Trends Ecol Evol 28(2):71–72. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2088298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson O (1986) Economic organization: firms, markets and policy control. Wheatsheaf, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong A, Bhatia M, Freeman Z (2009) Angel finance: the other venture capital. Strateg Chang 18(18):221–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia E [夏恩君], Li S [李森], Zhao X [赵轩维] (2015) 国外众筹研究综述与展望 [Crowdfunding abroad: literature review and prospect]. Technol Econ 34(10):10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang D [杨东], Huang C [黄超达], Liu S [刘思宇] (2015) 赢在众筹 [How to succeed with crowdfunding]. Zhongguo jinji chubanshe, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao W [姚文平] (2014) 互联网金融 [Internet finance]: 即将到来的新金融时代 [The coming era of new finance]. Zhongxin chubanshe, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye S [叶姝阳], Wu W [吴伟容] (2015) 众筹网络融资模式的监管问题研究——通过对比众筹与非法集资 [An Investigation of the supervision questions on Crowdfunding – by means of contrasting crowdfunding with illegal fundraising]. 财会研究 10:61–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin M [殷明波] (2015) 众筹模式在中国的发展研究 [Research on the development of the kinds of crowdfunding in China?]. Times Financ 1(577):58–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Young T (2013) The everything guide to crowdfunding: learn how to use social media for small-business funding: understand crowd psychology : gain an online presence : create a successful crowdfunding campaign: promote your campaign to reach hidden funding sources. Adams Media, Avon

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu T [余涛] (2015a) 众筹规制探究 – 一个规范分析的路径 [A normative study of legal perplexities related to crowd funding] Zhengquan shichang daobao March:12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu X [俞小海] (2015b) P2P网络借贷平台的刑事责任问题研究 [On the criminal responsibility of P2P network lending platform]. J Shantou Univ (Humanit Soc Sci Ed) 31(5):61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z [余政] (2015c) 众筹与非法集资之分野探究 [Research on the division of crowdfunding and illegal fundraising]. 江西警察学院学报 [J Jiangxi Police Inst] 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu L [余来文], Wen Z [温著彬], Bian J [边俊杰], Shi L [石磊] (2015) 互联网金融 [Internet finance]: 跨界, 众筹于大数据的融合 [The integration of crossover, crowdfunding and big data]. Jingji guanli chubanshe, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Zero2IPO (ed) (2014) 中国众筹模式运行统计分析报告 [Report on the statistical analysis of the dynamics of crowdfunding in China]: 2014 年上半年 [First half of 2014]

    Google Scholar 

  • Zero2IPO (ed) (2015) 中国众筹市场发展报告 [China crowdfunding market research report 2015]

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y [张雅] (2014) ’股权众筹法律制度国际比较与中国路径 [A comparison of the legal system of equity crowdfunding abroad with china’s path]. 西南金融 [Xinan jinrong] November:47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Yip C, Wang G, Zhang Q (2014) China crowdfunding report: how to leverage crowdfunding to support China’s social and environmental SGBs. Edited by China Impact Fund. http://www.ied.cn/sites/default/files/CIF%20China%20Crowdfunding%20Report_Final.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2016

  • Zheng H, Li D, Wu J, Xu Y (2014) The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: a comparative study in China and US. Inf Manag 51(4):488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng H [郑海超], Qi Z [齐子毫] , Wu J [伍晶] , Wang T [王涛], Wan N [万能] (2015) 产品众筹项目融资绩效的影响因素研究: ELM 理论视角 [Antecedents of reward-based crowdfunding performance∖: from the ELM perspective]. J UESTC 17(1):45–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong W [钟维], Wang Y [王毅纯] (2015) 中国式股权众筹 [Chinese style of equity crowdfunding]: 法律规制与投资者保护 [The establishment of legal rights and the protection of investors] 西南政法大学学报 [J Southwest Univ Polit Sci Law] 17(2):19–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Funk, A.S. (2019). The Concept of Crowdfunding in the West Versus in China. In: Crowdfunding in China. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97253-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics