Skip to main content

Working with the Forecast Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 556 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Texts in Econometrics ((PTEC))

Abstract

The forecast histograms reported by the respondents to some surveys, such as the US SPF, are typically viewed as estimates of the individuals’ subjective distributions. There are various ways of calculating the quantities of interest from the histograms, and these are reviewed. Quantities of interest might include first moments such as means and modes, as well as variances, and the forecast probability that Y will be less than some value. The last is typically required by popular methods of evaluating the histograms. The difficulties arise because the histograms do not fully reveal the respondents’ probability density/distribution function, and the methods include non-parametric techniques, as well as the fitting of parametric distributions, including distributions which allow for asymmetry in the individual’s underlying assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The location of the bins (and so the x’s) and their number and widths (w) vary over the sample period, but this is suppressed in the notation for convenience.

  2. 2.

    We assume that the interval 2 to 2.9 is actually [2,3], so that the interval is of length 1. This means that \(F\left ( 3\right ) =0.2\), for example (as opposed to \(F\left ( 2.9\right ) =0.2\)). This assumption is implicit in how we have written the fourth column of Table 3.1, and underpins the fitting of the parametric distributions.

  3. 3.

    See the online documentation provided by the Philadelphia Feb: ‘Documentation for the Philadelphia Fed’s Survey of Professional Forecasters’, http://www.phil.frb.org/econ/spf/. The problematic survey quarters are 1985.1, 1986.1, 1968.4, 1969.4, 1970.4, 1971.4, 1972.3, 1972.4, 1973.4, 1975.4, 1976.4, 1977.4, 1978.4, 1979.2, 1979.3, 1979.4.

References

  • Boero, G., Smith, J., & Wallis, K. F. (2015). The measurement and characteristics of professional forecasters’ uncertainty. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 30(7), 1013–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, N., & Nevzorov, V. B. (2003). A primer on statistical distributions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diebold, F. X., Tay, A. S., & Wallis, K. F. (1999). Evaluating density forecasts of inflation: The Survey of Professional Forecasters. In R. F. Engle & H. White (Eds.), Cointegration, causality and forecasting: A Festschrift in Honour of Clive Granger (pp. 76–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelberg, J., Manski, C. F., & Williams, J. (2009). Comparing the point predictions and subjective probability distributions of professional forecasters. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 27(1), 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordani, P., & Söderlind, P. (2003). Inflation forecast uncertainty. European Economic Review, 47(6), 1037–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G., Stuart, A., & Ord, J. K. (1987). Advanced theory of statistics (5th ed., Vols. 1 and 2). London: Charles Griffin and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Pérez, V. (2015). Measures of macroeconomic uncertainty for the ECB’s Survey of Professional Forecasters. In M. Donduran, M. Uzunöz, E. Bulut, T. O. Cadirci, & T. Aksoy (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Conference on Social Sciences: Istanbul: Yildiz Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Pérez, V. (2016). Does Uncertainty Affect Participation in the European Central Bank’s Survey of Professional Forecasters?. Mimeo, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarnowitz, V., & Lambros, L. A. (1987). Consensus and uncertainty in economic prediction. Journal of Political Economy, 95(3), 591–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clements, M.P. (2019). Working with the Forecast Data. In: Macroeconomic Survey Expectations. Palgrave Texts in Econometrics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97223-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97223-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-97222-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97223-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics