Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Dual-Process Theories of Numerical Cognition pp 89–121Cite as

Possible Explanations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 222 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Philosophy ((BRIEFSPHILOSOPH))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2016). Origins of the brain networks for advanced mathematics in expert mathematicians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 4909–4917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, J., Campbell, F. W., & Francis, M. R. (1976). The magic number 4 ± 0: A new look at visual numerosity judgments. Perception, 5, 327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J. (1984). More precisely defining and measuring the order-irrelevance principle. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, A. J., & Gannon, K. E. (1984). The development of the commutativity principle and economical addition strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. (2017). Can bootstrapping explain concept learning? Cognition, 158, 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briars, D., & Siegler, R. S. (1984). A feature analysis of preschoolers’ counting knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 20, 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, L. E. J. (1912). Intuitionism and formalism. In P. Benacerraf & H. Putnam (Eds.), Philosophy of mathematics. selected readings, (1964). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, L. E. J. (1981). Brouwer’s Cambridge lectures in intuitionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1968). Processes of cognitive growth: Infancy. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (2001). Cognitive foundations of arithmetic: Evolution and ontogenesis. Mind and Language, 16(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (2004). Bootstrapping and the origin of concepts. Daedalus, 133, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (2009a). The origin of concepts. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (2009b). Where our number concepts come from. The Journal of Philosophy, 106, 220–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casadei, F. (1999). Alcuni pregi e limiti della teoria cognitivista della metafora. Lingua e Stile, XXXIV(2), 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casadei, F. (2003). Per un bilancio della Semantica Cognitiva. In L. Gaeta & S. Luraghi (Eds.), Introduzione alla Linguistica Cognitiva (pp. 37–55). Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellucci, C. (2013). Rethinking logic: Logic in relation to mathematics, evolution, and method. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. E. (1986). Metaphor. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense. How the mind creates mathematics. Revised and Updated Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S., & Brannon, E. (2011). Space, time and number in the brain. Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieudonné, J. (1981). History of functional analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, E., & Lakoff, G. (2005). Image schemas: From linguistic analysis to neural grounding. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemata in cognitive linguistics (pp. 57–91). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (2002). Infants’ discrimination of number vs. continuous extent. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 33–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillmore, C. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6, 222–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. (2008). The language of thought revisited. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K. C., & Hall, J. W. (1983). The acquisition of eraly number word meanings. In H. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of children’s mathematical thinking (pp. 49–107). New-York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K. C., Pergament, G. G., & Lyons, B. G. (1985). Collection terms and preschoolers’ use of the cardinality rule. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 315–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (1994). Children’s mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: APA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R. (1993). A rational-constructivist account of early learning about numbers and objects. In D. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., Greeno, J. G. (1989). On the nature of competence: Principles for understanding in a domain. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing and learning: Issues for a cognitive science of instruction, 125–186. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Meck, E. (1983). Preschooler’s counting: Principles before skills. Cognition, 13, 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Meck, E. (1986). The notion of principle: The case of counting. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 29–57). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., Meck, E., & Merkin, S. (1986). Young children’s numerical competence. Cognitive Development, 1, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, R., & Tucker, M. F. (1975). Further investigations of the young child’s conception of number. Child Development, 46, 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. W. (2005). The psychological status of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemata in cognitive linguistics (pp. 113–135). Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphor works. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 401–424). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, M. (2013). Numbers in mind. Between intuitionism and cognitive science. Reti, Saperi, Linguaggi, 4, 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, M. (2015). Numerical cognition and philosophy of mathematics. Dehaene’s (neuro)intuitionism and the relevance of language. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio, SFL 2014, 362–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen, G. J., & Parkman, J. M. (1972). A chronometric analysis of simple addition. Psychological Review, 79, 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halford, G. S. (1993). Children’s understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, R. (2006). Rationality and logic. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hespos, S. J., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Conceptual precursors to language. Nature, 430(6998), 453–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Perseus Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R. W. (1987). Fondations of cognitive grammar, vol 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Mind mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lépine, R., Barrouillet, P., & Camos, V. (2003). New evidence about the nature of the subitizing process. The XIII Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology. Grenade, Espagne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lolli, G. (2004). Da dove viene la matematica. Recensione di G. Lakoff, R. E. Nunez, Where Mathematics comes from. http://homepage.sns.it/lolli/articoli/LakNun.pdf.

  • Longo, G. (2005). The cognitive foundations of mathematics: Human gestures in proofs and mathematical incompleteness of formalisms. In M. Okada, et al. (Eds.), Images and reasoning (pp. 105–134). Tokio: Keio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B., & Levinson, S. C. (2004). Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(3), 108–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molko, N., Wilson, A., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Dyscalculie, le sens perdu des nombres. La Recherche, 10, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, M., Fumarola, A., Chinello, A., & Melcher, D. (2011). Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity. Cognition, 121(1), 147–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. (1907). The value of science. New York: The Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1998). The role of visual indexes in spatial vision and imagery. In R. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 215–231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1986). The development of mathematical intuition. In M. Perimutter (Ed.), Perspectives on intellectual: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revkin, S. K., Piazza, M., Izard, V., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation? Psychological Science, 19(6), 607–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, G. (2014). Innate and learned: Carey, mad dog nativism, and the poverty of stimuli and analogies (yet again). Mind and Language, 29, 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rips, L. J., Bloomfield, A., & Asmuth, J. (2008). From numerical concepts to concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 623–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psycology, 104, 192–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1979). The metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. (2004). Foundations of mathematics: Metaphysics, epistemology, structure. The Philosophical Quarterly, 54, 16–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, E. F., & Shepperson, B. (1990). The what-if of counting. Cognition, 36, 285–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, R. S., & Crowley, K. (1994). Constraints on learning in nonprivileged domains. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 194–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2006). A deflationary account of metaphor. UCL Work. Pap. Linguist, 18, 171–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson, O. (1975). Analysis of time required by children for simple addition. Acta Psychologica, 39, 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preat-tentive processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Per- ception and Performance, 19, 331–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. T., & Rosch, E. (1992). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, F. (2003). Numerosity discrimination in infants: Evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition, 89, 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2006). Metaphor, relevance and the ‘Emergent Property’ issue. Mind and Language, 21(3), 230–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, K. (1990). Children’s understanding of counting. Cognition, 36, 155–193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy

    Mario Graziano

Authors
  1. Mario Graziano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Graziano .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Graziano, M. (2018). Possible Explanations. In: Dual-Process Theories of Numerical Cognition. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96797-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation